Claim · model-written summary
The presence of the parasitoid Aphidius colemani did not alter the distribution change of MACE forms on pepper.
- Taxon
- peppere2
- Treatment
- presence of the parasitoide0
- Interactor
- Myzus persicae
Myzus persicaee1pest - Second interactor
- A colemani
Aphidius colemanie0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- this change in distributione0
- Direction
- did not altere0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The presence of the parasitoid A colemani did not alter this change in distribution”
e1“clones of Myzus persicae (Sulzer)”
e2“The level of parasitism of M persicae by the parasitoid Aphidius colemani (Viereck) was significantly lower in MACE forms on pepper crops compared to non-MACE forms”
Title
Stephen P Foster; Neil B Kift; Jason Baverstock; et al. Pest Management Science 2003. doi:10.1002/ps.751
Other claims from this paper (4)
- Observation MACE forms of Myzus persicae appeared to reproduce at slower rates than non-MACE forms.
- Observation MACE forms of Myzus persicae were more responsive to alarm pheromone than non-MACE counterparts.
- Observation Parasitism of Myzus persicae by Aphidius colemani was significantly lower on MACE forms than on non-MACE forms on pepper crops.
- Observation MACE forms of Myzus persicae were distributed differently on pepper plants, with more found on growing points.