Literal values, not normalised. 183,098 distinct spellings cover 1,706,259 claims; only letter case and spacing are merged, so “maize”, “corn” and “Zea mays L.” are three separate entries here. The By interacting organism view merges spellings of one organism through NCBI Taxonomy.
Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Hisar Arun tomato was the least preferred variety for Amrasca devastans and Bemisia tabaci .
A. devastans e5 pest Verbatim
t0 “Different Varieties of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–100 e5 “Varietal response showed that the variety, Hisar Arun was least preferred by the A. devastans and B. tabaci ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–804 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
P. lilacinum PL1 at 1 × 10 7 conidia ml −1 decreased A. devastans nymph populations by 88.66% in vitro.
1 × 10 7 conidia ml −1 of P. lilacinum PL1 e0 A. devastans e0 pest population of A. devastans nymphs e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “1 × 10 7 conidia ml −1 of P. lilacinum PL1 exhibited a success rate of 88.66% in decreasing the population of A. devastans nymphs in vitro ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1089 t0 “in okra plantation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 156–174 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
March cotton at the 1.0 leafhopper per leaf threshold needed one insecticide application.
A. devastans e0 pest insecticidal application e0 AT of 1.0 A. devastans per leaf e0 Verbatim
e0 “At this planting time, only one insecticidal application was needed at an AT of 1.0 A. devastans per leaf ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–870 e1 “Cotton planted on 15 March ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–654 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
March cotton at the 1.0 threshold had no significant yield loss.
AT of 1.0 A. devastans per leaf e0 A. devastans e0 pest no significant e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “At this planting time, only one insecticidal application was needed at an AT of 1.0 A. devastans per leaf, with no significant yield loss ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–902 e1 “Cotton planted on 15 March ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–654 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
May planted cotton was more vulnerable to leafhopper damage.
A. devastans e0 pest A. devastans damage e0 more vulnerable e0 Verbatim
e0 “The 15 May planting was more vulnerable to A. devastans damage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1313 e1 “cotton planted on 15 April and 15 May ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1038 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Leafhopper peak was 3.30 per three leaves per plant in January.
A. devastans e0 pest peak population of A. devastans e0 3.30 / three leaves / plant e0 Verbatim
e0 “The peak population of A. devastans, B. tabaci and M. persicae was recorded in second and third week of January (3.30 / three leaves / plant, 0.30 / three leaves / plant and 11.20 / three leaves / plant). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–533 t0 “ash gourd ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–48 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Coccinellids reached 2.80 mean population per 6 leaves on tomato in the A. devastans case.
coccinellids e4 biocontrol_agent A. devastans e5 pest 2.80 mean population/6 leaves e4 Verbatim
t0 “major insect pests of tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–88 e4 “coccinellids (2.80 mean population/6 leaves) and spiders (2.23 mean population/6 leaves) was noticed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–733 e5 “in case of A. devastans ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–512 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Spiders reached 2.23 mean population per 6 leaves on tomato in the A. devastans case.
A. devastans e5 pest 2.23 mean population/6 leaves e4 Verbatim
t0 “major insect pests of tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–88 e4 “coccinellids (2.80 mean population/6 leaves) and spiders (2.23 mean population/6 leaves) was noticed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–733 e5 “in case of A. devastans ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–512 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Fenugreek carried A. devastans at 0.75+0.06.
A. devastans e0 pest Verbatim
e0 “fenugreek was infested by thrips, Thrips angusticeps 2.23+0.037; aphid, Aphis craccivora 1.39+0.20, jassid, A. devastans 0.75+0.06 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1049 Other claims from this paper (13) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Cumin seed carried A. devastans at 0.74+0.19.
A. devastans e0 pest Verbatim
e0 “The cumin seed was attacked by thrip, T. tabaci 3.39+0.60, jassid, A. devastans 0.74+0.19 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1164 Other claims from this paper (13) 
Solanum lycopersicumt0
Bemisia tabacie5pest.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Abelmoschus esculentus
Purpureocillium lilacinum
Gossypium hirsutum
Benincasa hispida
Trigonella foenum-graecum
Cuminum cyminum