A. patulus 2 claims

Interactor role: weed

Literal values, not normalised. 183,098 distinct spellings cover 1,706,259 claims; only letter case and spacing are merged, so “maize”, “corn” and “Zea mays L.” are three separate entries here. The By interacting organism view merges spellings of one organism through NCBI Taxonomy.

2 claims

Open in search (filters, sorting) →

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield loss model for Amaranthus patulus was y=281.3/(1+0.1723x), with R² of 0.952.

Taxon: Red PepperCapsicum annuum var. annuumt0
Interactor: A. patulusAmaranthus hybriduse0weed
Outcome: y=281.3/(1+0.1723x)e0
Value: $R^2$=0.952e0

Verbatim

e0
“y=281.3/(1+0.1723x), $R^2$=0.952 in A. patulus”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1274

t0
“Yield Response of Red Pepper”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28

Title

Yield Response of Red Pepper by Densities of D. ciliaris and A. patulus in Eco-firendly Cultivated Field

Jong-Gun Won; Kil-Su Jang; Ji-Eun Hwang; et al. Weed & Turfgrass Science 2012. doi:10.5660/wts.2012.1.4.038

Other claims from this paper (4)

Method / resource The yield loss model for Digitaria ciliaris was y=304.7/(1+0.063x), with R² of 0.967.
Association Economic weed thresholds were negatively related to weed competitiveness.
Observation The economic threshold for D. ciliaris was 18.2 plants per 100 square meters.
Observation The economic threshold for A. patulus was 7.2 plants per 100 square meters.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured