Literal values, not normalised. 183,098 distinct spellings cover 1,706,259 claims; only letter case and spacing are merged, so “maize”, “corn” and “Zea mays L.” are three separate entries here. The By interacting organism view merges spellings of one organism through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping cauliflower with cabbage reduced aphid and A. rapae populations compared with monoculture.
Treatmentintercropping with cabbage e2 Outcomeaphids and A. rapae populations e2 Settingtwo successive winter seasons e0 Verbatim
e0 “were studied during two successive winter seasons (2005-2006) and (2006-2007) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–334 e1 “Effects of intercropping cauliflower with cabbage or radish on the population of aphids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–87 e2 “Intercropping with cabbage reduced aphids and A. rapae populations than the monoculture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–535 e4 “Results showed significantly effect for reducing infestation with the insect pests of cauliflower intercropped ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–446 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
High numbers of aphids and A. rapae were detected in December during both seasons.
Outcomeaphids and A. rapae e5 Qualifierin December during both seasons e5 Verbatim
e1 “Effects of intercropping cauliflower with cabbage or radish on the population of aphids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–87 e5 “High numbers of aphids and A. rapae were detected in December during both seasons ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–714 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
LC50 values against imported cabbageworm larvae varied across four nematode isolates.
Value18.2, 3.6, 5.7, and 8.3 e0 Verbatim
e0 “LC(50) values of S. carpocapsae All, S. feltiae UK, S. feltiae 27, and S. riobrave 335 were 18.2, 3.6, 5.7, and 8.3 on A. rapae L(2) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–345 t0 “crucifers ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–76 Other claims from this paper (16) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
S. riobrave produced 100% mortality of A. rapae larvae at 30 degrees C.
Second interactorS. riobrave e0 biocontrol_agent Verbatim
e0 “Maximum mortality (100%) was recorded for A. rapae L(2) from S. riobrave at 30 degrees C ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–626 t0 “crucifers ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–76 Other claims from this paper (16) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
A. rapae mortality increased with nematode contact time.
Treatmentcontact time to nematode e0 OutcomeMortality of A. rapae L(2) e0 Verbatim
e0 “Mortality of A. rapae L(2) increased with contact time to nematode. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–810 t0 “crucifers ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–76 Other claims from this paper (16) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Larval susceptibility to nematodes increased with larval age across all three pest species.
Organ / stagelarval age development e0 Second interactorentomopathogenic nematodes e0 biocontrol_agent OutcomeSusceptibility of A. rapae , P. xylostella , and T. ni larvae to entomopathogenic nematodes e0 Verbatim
e0 “Susceptibility of A. rapae , P. xylostella , and T. ni larvae to entomopathogenic nematodes increased with larval age development. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1050 t0 “crucifers ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–76 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Field application of S. carpocapsae gave 35.3% A. rapae control on Brussels sprouts in 1996.
Treatmentfoliar applications of S. carpocapsae e0 Second interactorS. carpocapsae e0 biocontrol_agent Outcomecontrol of A. rapae e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Under field conditions, foliar applications of S. carpocapsae provided 35.3% and 33.0% control of A. rapae (L(3)-L(5)) on Brussels sprouts and broccoli in 1996 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1486–1645 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Field application of S. carpocapsae gave 33.0% A. rapae control on broccoli in 1996.
Treatmentfoliar applications of S. carpocapsae e0 Second interactorS. carpocapsae e0 biocontrol_agent Outcomecontrol of A. rapae e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Under field conditions, foliar applications of S. carpocapsae provided 35.3% and 33.0% control of A. rapae (L(3)-L(5)) on Brussels sprouts and broccoli in 1996 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1486–1645 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Field application of S. carpocapsae gave 24.9% A. rapae control on Brussels sprouts in 1999.
Treatmentfoliar applications of S. carpocapsae e1 Second interactorS. carpocapsae e1 biocontrol_agent Outcomecontrol of A. rapae e1 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “24.9%, 19.4% and 14.9% on Brussels sprouts, broccoli, and cauliflower, respectively, in 1999. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1743 e1 “foliar applications of S. carpocapsae provided 35.3% and 33.0% control of A. rapae ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1592 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Field application of S. carpocapsae gave 19.4% A. rapae control on broccoli in 1999.
Treatmentfoliar applications of S. carpocapsae e1 Second interactorS. carpocapsae e1 biocontrol_agent Outcomecontrol of A. rapae e1 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “24.9%, 19.4% and 14.9% on Brussels sprouts, broccoli, and cauliflower, respectively, in 1999. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1743 e1 “foliar applications of S. carpocapsae provided 35.3% and 33.0% control of A. rapae ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1592 Other claims from this paper (16)