Claim · model-written summary
Control of I. wrightii ranged from 92 to 99% at 28 days after treatment.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativat0 - Interactor
- I. wrightii
Ipomoea wrightiie0weed - Outcome
- I. wrightiie0
- Value
- 92 to 99%e0
- Qualifier
- 28 days after treatmente0
Verbatim
e0“Control of E. crus‐galli, S. exaltata and I. wrightii ranged from 73 to 99%, 75 to 99%, and 92 to 99% at 28 days after treatment, respectively.”
t0“rice”
Title
Interaction between timings and doses of quindorac in rice
J. E. STREET; HOLGER TERESIAK; D. L. BOYKIN; et al. Weed Research 1995. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3180.1995.tb02019.x
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Intervention effect Early post-emergence application gave the greatest control of Echinochloa crus-galli.
- Intervention effect Early post-emergence application gave the greatest control of Sesbania exaltata.
- Intervention effect Early post-emergence application gave the greatest control of Ipomoea wrightii.
- Intervention effect Applying quinclorac to dry soil before emergence significantly reduced weed control.
- Intervention effect Pre-emergence application to moist soil gave weed control comparable to higher-rate early post-emergence application.
- Intervention effect Pre-plant incorporated quinclorac controlled weeds effectively.
- Observation Control of E. crus-galli ranged from 73 to 99% at 28 days after treatment.
- Observation Control of S. exaltata ranged from 75 to 99% at 28 days after treatment.
- Association Rice yield generally reflected weed control.
- Observation No rice injury was observed under any treatment.
- Recommendation The authors recommend early post-emergence application for reduced quinclorac rates.
- Recommendation The authors recommend considering field conditions when applying reduced rates before emergence.