ICW 6 claims

Interactor role: pest

Literal values, not normalised. 183,098 distinct spellings cover 1,706,259 claims; only letter case and spacing are merged, so “maize”, “corn” and “Zea mays L.” are three separate entries here. The By interacting organism view merges spellings of one organism through NCBI Taxonomy.

6 claims

Open in search (filters, sorting) →

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trap cropping reduced ICW abundance by 73% in the first head cabbage trial.

Taxon: head cabbagee1
Treatment: trap croppinge1
Interactor: ICWe1pest
Outcome: ICW abundancee1
Direction: reducede1
Value: 73%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“In the first head cabbage trial, trap cropping reduced DBM abundance by 46% and ICW abundance by 73%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–825

Title

Integrating Trap Cropping and Entomopathogenic Nematode Foliar Sprays to Manage Diamondback Moth and Imported Cabbage Worm

Sabina Budhathoki; Brent Sipes; Ikkei Shikano; et al. Horticulturae 2022. doi:10.3390/horticulturae8111073

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Trap cropping reduced DBM abundance by 46% in the first head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping reduced DBM leaf damage by 45% in the first head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping reduced ICW leaf damage by 33% in the first head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect DBM populations were reduced by 19% in the second head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect ICW was reduced by 65% in the second head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping had no effect on leaf damage in the second head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping suppressed DBM abundance by 50% in the first kale trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping suppressed DBM leaf damage by 19% in the first kale trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping had no significant effect on ICW in the first kale trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping reduced ICW leaf damage by 13% in the second kale trial.
Intervention effect Adding EPN foliar sprays further reduced DBM populations in plots with trap crops in the first head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect Adding EPN foliar sprays further reduced ICW in plots without trap crops in the first head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect EPNs suppressed DBM populations entirely in the second kale trial.
Intervention effect EPNs had no effects in the second head cabbage trial or the first kale trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping with kai choi did not consistently improve the efficacy of EPN foliar sprays.
Association EPNs were most successful at suppressing DBM and ICW populations when average pest pressure was below 0.5/plant.
Association Trap crops worked more effectively at insect populations above 0.5/plant.
Intervention effect Trap cropping lowered the weight of head cabbage and kale when planted 30 cm or closer to kai choi.
Intervention effect Leaving a 60 cm distance between cash and trap crops resolved the loss of weight.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trap cropping reduced ICW leaf damage by 33% in the first head cabbage trial.

Taxon: head cabbagee1
Treatment: trap croppinge1
Interactor: ICWe2pest
Outcome: Leaf damage by DBM and ICWe2
Direction: reducede2
Value: 33%e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“In the first head cabbage trial, trap cropping reduced DBM abundance by 46% and ICW abundance by 73%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–825

e2
“Leaf damage by DBM and ICW were reduced by 45% and 33%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–895

Title

Integrating Trap Cropping and Entomopathogenic Nematode Foliar Sprays to Manage Diamondback Moth and Imported Cabbage Worm

Sabina Budhathoki; Brent Sipes; Ikkei Shikano; et al. Horticulturae 2022. doi:10.3390/horticulturae8111073

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Trap cropping reduced DBM abundance by 46% in the first head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping reduced ICW abundance by 73% in the first head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping reduced DBM leaf damage by 45% in the first head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect DBM populations were reduced by 19% in the second head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect ICW was reduced by 65% in the second head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping had no effect on leaf damage in the second head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping suppressed DBM abundance by 50% in the first kale trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping suppressed DBM leaf damage by 19% in the first kale trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping had no significant effect on ICW in the first kale trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping reduced ICW leaf damage by 13% in the second kale trial.
Intervention effect Adding EPN foliar sprays further reduced DBM populations in plots with trap crops in the first head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect Adding EPN foliar sprays further reduced ICW in plots without trap crops in the first head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect EPNs suppressed DBM populations entirely in the second kale trial.
Intervention effect EPNs had no effects in the second head cabbage trial or the first kale trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping with kai choi did not consistently improve the efficacy of EPN foliar sprays.
Association EPNs were most successful at suppressing DBM and ICW populations when average pest pressure was below 0.5/plant.
Association Trap crops worked more effectively at insect populations above 0.5/plant.
Intervention effect Trap cropping lowered the weight of head cabbage and kale when planted 30 cm or closer to kai choi.
Intervention effect Leaving a 60 cm distance between cash and trap crops resolved the loss of weight.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ICW was reduced by 65% in the second head cabbage trial.

Taxon: head cabbagee3
Treatment: trap croppinge0
Interactor: ICWe3pest
Outcome: ICWe3
Direction: reducede3
Value: 65%e3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“with trap cropping using kai choi (Brassica juncea) planted as an intercrop”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–500

e3
“In the second head cabbage trial, DBM populations were reduced by 19% whereas ICW was reduced by 65%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–997

Title

Integrating Trap Cropping and Entomopathogenic Nematode Foliar Sprays to Manage Diamondback Moth and Imported Cabbage Worm

Sabina Budhathoki; Brent Sipes; Ikkei Shikano; et al. Horticulturae 2022. doi:10.3390/horticulturae8111073

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Trap cropping reduced DBM abundance by 46% in the first head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping reduced ICW abundance by 73% in the first head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping reduced DBM leaf damage by 45% in the first head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping reduced ICW leaf damage by 33% in the first head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect DBM populations were reduced by 19% in the second head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping had no effect on leaf damage in the second head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping suppressed DBM abundance by 50% in the first kale trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping suppressed DBM leaf damage by 19% in the first kale trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping had no significant effect on ICW in the first kale trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping reduced ICW leaf damage by 13% in the second kale trial.
Intervention effect Adding EPN foliar sprays further reduced DBM populations in plots with trap crops in the first head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect Adding EPN foliar sprays further reduced ICW in plots without trap crops in the first head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect EPNs suppressed DBM populations entirely in the second kale trial.
Intervention effect EPNs had no effects in the second head cabbage trial or the first kale trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping with kai choi did not consistently improve the efficacy of EPN foliar sprays.
Association EPNs were most successful at suppressing DBM and ICW populations when average pest pressure was below 0.5/plant.
Association Trap crops worked more effectively at insect populations above 0.5/plant.
Intervention effect Trap cropping lowered the weight of head cabbage and kale when planted 30 cm or closer to kai choi.
Intervention effect Leaving a 60 cm distance between cash and trap crops resolved the loss of weight.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Trap cropping had no significant effect on ICW in the first kale trial.

Taxon: kaleBrassica oleracea var. viridise5
Treatment: Trap croppinge5
Interactor: ICWe6pest
Outcome: ICWe6

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e5
“Trap cropping suppressed DBM abundance by 50% and DBM leaf damage by 19% in the first kale trial”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1136

e6
“No significant effects were observed on ICW”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1181

Title

Integrating Trap Cropping and Entomopathogenic Nematode Foliar Sprays to Manage Diamondback Moth and Imported Cabbage Worm

Sabina Budhathoki; Brent Sipes; Ikkei Shikano; et al. Horticulturae 2022. doi:10.3390/horticulturae8111073

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Trap cropping reduced DBM abundance by 46% in the first head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping reduced ICW abundance by 73% in the first head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping reduced DBM leaf damage by 45% in the first head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping reduced ICW leaf damage by 33% in the first head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect DBM populations were reduced by 19% in the second head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect ICW was reduced by 65% in the second head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping had no effect on leaf damage in the second head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping suppressed DBM abundance by 50% in the first kale trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping suppressed DBM leaf damage by 19% in the first kale trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping reduced ICW leaf damage by 13% in the second kale trial.
Intervention effect Adding EPN foliar sprays further reduced DBM populations in plots with trap crops in the first head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect Adding EPN foliar sprays further reduced ICW in plots without trap crops in the first head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect EPNs suppressed DBM populations entirely in the second kale trial.
Intervention effect EPNs had no effects in the second head cabbage trial or the first kale trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping with kai choi did not consistently improve the efficacy of EPN foliar sprays.
Association EPNs were most successful at suppressing DBM and ICW populations when average pest pressure was below 0.5/plant.
Association Trap crops worked more effectively at insect populations above 0.5/plant.
Intervention effect Trap cropping lowered the weight of head cabbage and kale when planted 30 cm or closer to kai choi.
Intervention effect Leaving a 60 cm distance between cash and trap crops resolved the loss of weight.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trap cropping reduced ICW leaf damage by 13% in the second kale trial.

Taxon: kaleBrassica oleracea var. viridise7
Treatment: trap croppinge7
Interactor: ICWe7pest
Outcome: ICW leaf damagee7
Direction: reducede7
Value: 13%e7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e7
“In the second kale trial, trap cropping reduced ICW leaf damage by 13%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1253

Title

Integrating Trap Cropping and Entomopathogenic Nematode Foliar Sprays to Manage Diamondback Moth and Imported Cabbage Worm

Sabina Budhathoki; Brent Sipes; Ikkei Shikano; et al. Horticulturae 2022. doi:10.3390/horticulturae8111073

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Trap cropping reduced DBM abundance by 46% in the first head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping reduced ICW abundance by 73% in the first head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping reduced DBM leaf damage by 45% in the first head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping reduced ICW leaf damage by 33% in the first head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect DBM populations were reduced by 19% in the second head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect ICW was reduced by 65% in the second head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping had no effect on leaf damage in the second head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping suppressed DBM abundance by 50% in the first kale trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping suppressed DBM leaf damage by 19% in the first kale trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping had no significant effect on ICW in the first kale trial.
Intervention effect Adding EPN foliar sprays further reduced DBM populations in plots with trap crops in the first head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect Adding EPN foliar sprays further reduced ICW in plots without trap crops in the first head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect EPNs suppressed DBM populations entirely in the second kale trial.
Intervention effect EPNs had no effects in the second head cabbage trial or the first kale trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping with kai choi did not consistently improve the efficacy of EPN foliar sprays.
Association EPNs were most successful at suppressing DBM and ICW populations when average pest pressure was below 0.5/plant.
Association Trap crops worked more effectively at insect populations above 0.5/plant.
Intervention effect Trap cropping lowered the weight of head cabbage and kale when planted 30 cm or closer to kai choi.
Intervention effect Leaving a 60 cm distance between cash and trap crops resolved the loss of weight.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding EPN foliar sprays further reduced ICW in plots without trap crops in the first head cabbage trial.

Taxon: head cabbagee7
Treatment: adding EPN foliar sprayse7
Interactor: ICWe7pest
Second interactor: EPNe7biocontrol_agent
Outcome: ICWe7
Direction: further reducede7
Qualifier: in plots without trap cropse7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e7
“In the first head cabbage trial, adding EPN foliar sprays further reduced DBM populations in plots with trap crops and ICW in plots without trap crops”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1405

Title

Integrating Trap Cropping and Entomopathogenic Nematode Foliar Sprays to Manage Diamondback Moth and Imported Cabbage Worm

Sabina Budhathoki; Brent Sipes; Ikkei Shikano; et al. Horticulturae 2022. doi:10.3390/horticulturae8111073

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Trap cropping reduced DBM abundance by 46% in the first head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping reduced ICW abundance by 73% in the first head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping reduced DBM leaf damage by 45% in the first head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping reduced ICW leaf damage by 33% in the first head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect DBM populations were reduced by 19% in the second head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect ICW was reduced by 65% in the second head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping had no effect on leaf damage in the second head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping suppressed DBM abundance by 50% in the first kale trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping suppressed DBM leaf damage by 19% in the first kale trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping had no significant effect on ICW in the first kale trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping reduced ICW leaf damage by 13% in the second kale trial.
Intervention effect Adding EPN foliar sprays further reduced DBM populations in plots with trap crops in the first head cabbage trial.
Intervention effect EPNs suppressed DBM populations entirely in the second kale trial.
Intervention effect EPNs had no effects in the second head cabbage trial or the first kale trial.
Intervention effect Trap cropping with kai choi did not consistently improve the efficacy of EPN foliar sprays.
Association EPNs were most successful at suppressing DBM and ICW populations when average pest pressure was below 0.5/plant.
Association Trap crops worked more effectively at insect populations above 0.5/plant.
Intervention effect Trap cropping lowered the weight of head cabbage and kale when planted 30 cm or closer to kai choi.
Intervention effect Leaving a 60 cm distance between cash and trap crops resolved the loss of weight.