L 11 1 claim

Interactor role: pathogen

Literal values, not normalised. 183,098 distinct spellings cover 1,706,259 claims; only letter case and spacing are merged, so “maize”, “corn” and “Zea mays L.” are three separate entries here. The By interacting organism view merges spellings of one organism through NCBI Taxonomy.

1 claim

Open in search (filters, sorting) →

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Form L 11 failed to penetrate Markton.

Taxon: OATAvena sativat0
Interactor: L 11e0pathogen
Outcome: failed to penetratee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“Forms C 1 and L 11 failed to penetrate”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–532

t0
“OAT”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–18

Title

THE BIOLOGY OF OAT SMUTS

J. H. WESTERN Annals of Applied Biology 1936. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1936.tb05566.x

Other claims from this paper (14)

Observation Form L x persisted longer on Avena strigosa than L 11 on Potato.
Observation Neither of the two oat hosts produced infected panicles.
Observation Markton response varied among six smut collections.
Observation Form C 1 failed to penetrate Markton.
Observation Form C 2 entered Markton and persisted for some time.
Observation Sheathing structures occurred around penetrating tubes in Markton inoculated with C 1.
Observation Sheathing structures occurred around penetrating tubes in Markton inoculated with C 4.
Observation C 4 invasion produced necrotic areas in Markton.
Observation L 1 invasion produced necrotic areas in Markton.
Observation L 2 invasion produced necrotic areas in Markton.
Observation Five resistance grades were described for oat varieties.
Mechanism Oat smut resistance includes epidermal wall prevention of penetration.
Mechanism Oat smut resistance includes necrosis of host cells.
Mechanism Oat smut resistance includes retarded mycelial growth.