Literal values, not normalised. 183,098 distinct spellings cover 1,706,259 claims; only letter case and spacing are merged, so “maize”, “corn” and “Zea mays L.” are three separate entries here. The By interacting organism view merges spellings of one organism through NCBI Taxonomy.
Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Rice yield fell 22% at a density of 384 L. dubia plants per square metre.
Verbatim
e0 “yield of rice in densities of S. planiculmis (192 per $m^2$) and L. dubia (384 per $m^2$) was reduced by 43 and 22%, respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–821 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The fitted yield-density relation for L. dubia was Y=547.0kg/(1+0.000792x), with r squared 0.922.
Y=547.0kg/(1+0.000792x) e0 Verbatim
e0 “Y=547.0kg/(1+0.000792x), $r^2$=0.922 for L. dubia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1025 t0 “Rice Yield Loss ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
The economic control threshold for L. dubia was 34.9 per square metre.
economic threshold densities e0 Verbatim
e0 “economic threshold densities of S. planiculmis and L. dubia were calculated by 7.2 and 34.9 per $m^2$, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1172 t0 “Rice Yield Loss ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–15 Other claims from this paper (6) Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors concluded that controlling either weed above its economic threshold would be economically favorable.
Verbatim
e0 “잡초 발생밀도가 높을 때는 방제하는 것이 경제적으로 유리할 것으로 판단되었다. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–442 e1 “This result indicated that yield of rice in wet seeding rice cultivation could be reduced by over economic threshold densities of S. planiculmis and L. dubia . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1332 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
L. dubia reached the second leaf stage after 31, 22 and 16 days.
second leaf stages of weed species e1 31, 22, and 16 DAH e0 Verbatim
e0 “31, 22, and 16 DAH in L. dubia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–813 e1 “Days required to obtain the second leaf stages of weed species ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–591 e2 “by different rice seeding date(April 25, May 10, and May 25) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–242 Other claims from this paper (15) Observation Weed emergence ranked E. crus-galli, M. vaginalis, L. prostrata and L. dubia . Association Weed leaf development was faster with May 25 seeding. Observation E. crus-galli reached the second leaf stage after 16, 14 and 12 days for April 25, May 10 and May 25 seeding. Observation M. vaginalis reached the second leaf stage after 17, 14 and 12 days. Observation L. prostrata reached the second leaf stage after 27, 21 and 18 days.Observation E. crus-galli reached the third leaf stage after 21, 17 and 15 days. Observation M. vaginalis reached the third leaf stage after 23, 18 and 15 days. Observation L. prostrata reached the third leaf stage after 34, 25 and 21 days.Observation L. dubia reached the third leaf stage after 40, 28 and 20 days.Method / resource Effective cumulative temperatures were not useful for estimating herbicide timing. Observation E. crus-galli control timing was 1-4 days later with April 25 seeding. Observation E. crus-galli control timing was 0-3 days earlier with May 10 seeding. Observation E. crus-galli control timing was 2-5 days earlier with May 25 seeding. Observation Resistant M. vaginalis control timing was 1-4 days earlier with May 10 seeding. Observation Resistant M. vaginalis control timing was 2-6 days earlier with May 25 seeding. Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
L. dubia reached the third leaf stage after 40, 28 and 20 days.
third leaf stages of weed species e1 40, 28, and 20 DAH e0 Verbatim
e0 “40, 28, and 20 DAH in L. dubia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1109 e1 “days required to obtain the third leaf stages of weed species ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–909 e2 “by different rice seeding date(April 25, May 10, and May 25) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–242 Other claims from this paper (15) Observation Weed emergence ranked E. crus-galli, M. vaginalis, L. prostrata and L. dubia . Association Weed leaf development was faster with May 25 seeding. Observation E. crus-galli reached the second leaf stage after 16, 14 and 12 days for April 25, May 10 and May 25 seeding. Observation M. vaginalis reached the second leaf stage after 17, 14 and 12 days. Observation L. prostrata reached the second leaf stage after 27, 21 and 18 days.Observation L. dubia reached the second leaf stage after 31, 22 and 16 days.Observation E. crus-galli reached the third leaf stage after 21, 17 and 15 days. Observation M. vaginalis reached the third leaf stage after 23, 18 and 15 days. Observation L. prostrata reached the third leaf stage after 34, 25 and 21 days.Method / resource Effective cumulative temperatures were not useful for estimating herbicide timing. Observation E. crus-galli control timing was 1-4 days later with April 25 seeding. Observation E. crus-galli control timing was 0-3 days earlier with May 10 seeding. Observation E. crus-galli control timing was 2-5 days earlier with May 25 seeding. Observation Resistant M. vaginalis control timing was 1-4 days earlier with May 10 seeding. Observation Resistant M. vaginalis control timing was 2-6 days earlier with May 25 seeding. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Resistant L. dubia reduced rice yield by 44% compared with hand weeding.
resistant M. vaginalis, L. dubia e0 Verbatim
e0 “Rice yield was reduced 65%, 44%, and 35% by resistant M. vaginalis, L. dubia , and R. indica that escaped the pyrazosulfuron-ethyl plus molinate compared with hand weeding in direct-seeded rice culture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1386 t0 “Rice Yield Loss by the Resistant Weeds ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–185 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Lindernia dubia was resistant to imazosulfuron in 8 field samples.
resistant to imazosulfuron e7 Verbatim
e1 “Out of 114 farms in 15 districts, 50% of the farms had cultivated paddy rice as a part of the farm income ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–324 e7 “L. dubia (8), L. procumbens (5) and R. indica (1) accounted for the remainder of the weeds resistant to imazosulfuron in field samples
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1634–1768 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Sequential soil-applied and foliar herbicides controlled resistant L. dubia surviving pyrazosulfuron-ethyl plus molinate.
sequential applications of soil-applied herbicides, butachlor, dithiopyr, pyrazolate, and thiobencarb and foliar herbicides, bentazon e0 surviving resistant L. dubia e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The surviving resistant L. dubia after pyrazosulfuron-ethyl + molinate application can be controlled by sequential applications of soil-applied herbicides, butachlor, dithiopyr, pyrazolate, and thiobencarb and foliar herbicides, bentazon ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–739 t0 “Rice Culture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–82 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Sulfonylurea-based mixtures can also control surviving resistant L. dubia .
Sulfonylurea-based mixtures e0 surviving resistant L. dubia e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Sulfonylurea-based mixtures such as mixtures of azimsulfuron + anilofos, bensulfuron-methyl + oxadiazon, pyrazosulfuron-ethyl + fentrazamide, and pyrazosulfuron-ethyl + anilofos + carfentrazon can also be used to control the surviving resistant L. dubia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–994 t0 “Rice Culture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–82 Other claims from this paper (9) 
Oryza sativae0
Lindernia dubiae0weed
Bolboschoenus planiculmis