Claim · model-written summary
Resistant goosegrass required more than 13.44 kg ai ha −1 prodiamine for 50% control.
Verbatim
e0“Prodiamine rates required for 50% control and 50% shoot reductions after 6 wk for R-goosegrass measured > 13.44 and 3.2 kg ai ha −1 , respectively, whereas rates for the S-population measured 0.45 and < 0.42 kg ha −1 , respectively.”
e1“weed in turfgrass”
e2“Goosegrass is a problematic weed”
Title
Patrick E. McCullough; Jialin Yu; Diego Gómez de Barreda Weed Technology 2013. doi:10.1614/wt-d-13-00060.1
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Observation Resistant goosegrass required 3.2 kg ai ha −1 for 50% shoot reduction.
- Observation Susceptible goosegrass required 0.45 kg ha −1 for 50% control.
- Observation Susceptible goosegrass required less than 0.42 kg ha −1 for 50% shoot reduction.
- Intervention effect Sequential dithiopyr and prodiamine controlled under 20% of resistant goosegrass over two years.
- Intervention effect Dimethenamid-P controlled under 50% of goosegrass in 2011.
- Intervention effect Dimethenamid-P gave at least 90% control after seven months in 2012.
- Intervention effect Indaziflam gave excellent goosegrass control in both years.
- Intervention effect Oxadiazon controlled over 85% of goosegrass in 2011.
- Intervention effect Oxadiazon controlled at least 90% of goosegrass in 2012.
- Intervention effect Sulfentrazone controlled under 60% of goosegrass in 2011.
- Intervention effect Sulfentrazone averaged 94% goosegrass control in 2012.
- Observation Overall indaziflam and oxadiazon gave good to excellent control in both years.
- Observation Dimethenamid and sulfentrazone performed inconsistently.