R‐P 2 claims

Interactor role: pathogen

Literal values, not normalised. 183,098 distinct spellings cover 1,706,259 claims; only letter case and spacing are merged, so “maize”, “corn” and “Zea mays L.” are three separate entries here. The By interacting organism view merges spellings of one organism through NCBI Taxonomy.

2 claims

Open in search (filters, sorting) →

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yesterday was susceptible to pathotype R‐P.

Taxon: rosest0
Material: ‘Yesterday’e0
Interactor: R‐Pe0pathogen
Outcome: susceptiblee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“Although susceptible to R‐P, ‘Yesterday’ showed immunity to R‐E by arresting fungal development after conidium germination.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–859

t0
“Roses”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5

Title

Roses Exhibit Pathotype‐specific Resistance Responses to Powdery Mildew

Hossein Hosseini Moghaddam; Angelo Dewitte; Erik Van Bockstaele; et al. Journal of Phytopathology 2013. doi:10.1111/jph.12159

Other claims from this paper (8)

Observation The two rose genotypes reacted differently to the two powdery mildew pathotypes.
Observation Yesterday was immunity to pathotype R‐E.
Mechanism Yesterday arrested fungal development after conidium germination against R-E.
Observation R osa wichurana showed partial resistance to R‐P.
Observation R osa wichurana showed more resistant to R‐E.
Mechanism Increased cell reactions contributed to R osa wichurana resistance to R-E.
Observation F1 rose genotypes varied widely in resistance to both pathotypes.
Observation Rose resistance mechanisms differed by genotype and powdery mildew pathotype.

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured