rye-infecting bunt 2 claims

Interactor role: pathogen

Literal values, not normalised. 183,098 distinct spellings cover 1,706,259 claims; only letter case and spacing are merged, so “maize”, “corn” and “Zea mays L.” are three separate entries here. The By interacting organism view merges spellings of one organism through NCBI Taxonomy.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greenhouse inoculation confirmed the rye infecting bunt can infect wheat.

Treatment
Inoculatione0
Interactor
rye-infecting bunte0pathogen
Outcome
able to infect wheate0
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation studies conducted in the greenhouse confirmed that the rye-infecting bunt was able to infect wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–425

Title

Is rye bunt, Tilletia secalis, present in North America?

Lori Carris North American Fungi 2008. doi:10.2509/naf2008.003.0078

Other claims from this paper (4)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phylogenetic analysis distinguished the rye infecting bunt from wheat bunt pathogens.

Interactor
rye-infecting bunte0pathogen
Outcome
rye-infecting bunt was distincte0
Qualifier
T. contraversa and the common bunt pathogens of wheat, T. caries and T. laevise0

Verbatim

e0

“the rye-infecting bunt was distinct from T. contraversa and the common bunt pathogens of wheat, T. caries and T. laevis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–744

Title

Is rye bunt, Tilletia secalis, present in North America?

Lori Carris North American Fungi 2008. doi:10.2509/naf2008.003.0078

Other claims from this paper (4)