Claim · model-written summary
Artificial morningglory placed in the canopy did not increase peanut defoliation by early leaf spot and web blotch
- Taxon
- Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- Placing artificial morningglory in the peanut canopy when fungicides were appliede3
- Interactor
- early leaf spote3pathogen
- Second interactor
- web blotche3pathogen
- Outcome
- peanut defoliation by early leaf spot and web blotche3
- Direction
- increasee3
- Comparator
- fungicide applied without artificial morningglorye3
Verbatim
t0“Management Practices in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea)”
e3“Placing artificial morningglory in the peanut canopy when fungicides were applied did not intercept enough fungicide to increase peanut defoliation by early leaf spot and web blotch or reduce pod yield compared with fungicide applied without artificial morningglory”
Title
SARAH H. LANCASTER; DAVID L. JORDAN; ALAN C. YORK; et al. Weed Technology 2005. doi:10.1614/wt-04-229r.1
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Pyraclostrobin reduced entireleaf morningglory control by 2,4-DB in peanut
- Intervention effect azoxystrobin did not reduce entireleaf morningglory control by 2,4-DB in peanut
- Intervention effect boscalid did not reduce entireleaf morningglory control by 2,4-DB in peanut
- Intervention effect chlorothalonil did not reduce entireleaf morningglory control by 2,4-DB in peanut
- Intervention effect fluazinam did not reduce entireleaf morningglory control by 2,4-DB in peanut
- Intervention effect propiconazole plus trifloxystrobin did not reduce entireleaf morningglory control by 2,4-DB in peanut
- Intervention effect tebuconazole did not reduce entireleaf morningglory control by 2,4-DB in peanut
- Intervention effect Mixtures of fungicides, insecticides and foliar fertilizer/PGR did not affect tall morningglory control by 2,4-DB in peanut
- Intervention effect Artificial morningglory placed in the canopy did not reduce peanut pod yield