G . diffusa 2 claims

Literal values, not normalised. 437,395 distinct spellings cover 11,236,429 claims; only letter case and spacing are merged, so “maize”, “corn” and “Zea mays L.” are three separate entries here. The By organism view merges spellings of one organism through NCBI Taxonomy.

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sexual deception in G . diffusa is achieved largely through visual mimicry of female pollinators.

Taxon
G . diffusae3
Outcome
sexual deceptione3
Qualifier
visual mimicry of female pollinatorse3

Verbatim

e3

“Floral odour alone elicited significant preference in females only, indicating that, in contrast to orchids, sexual deception in G . diffusa is achieved largely through visual mimicry of female pollinators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1432

Title

Gender‐specific pollinator preference for floral traits

Marinus L. de Jager; Allan G. Ellis Functional Ecology 2012. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.02028.x

Other claims from this paper (1)
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A trade-off between the attraction of male and female flies may have contributed to floral divergence in G . diffusa.

Taxon
G . diffusae5
Outcome
attraction of male and female fliese5
Qualifier
divergence in floral phenotypee5

Verbatim

e5

“suggest that a trade‐off exists between the attraction of male and female flies, which may have contributed to the divergence in floral phenotype between morphotypes of G . diffusa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1729

Title

Gender‐specific pollinator preference for floral traits

Marinus L. de Jager; Allan G. Ellis Functional Ecology 2012. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.02028.x

Other claims from this paper (1)