L ycium ferocissimum 1 claim

Literal values, not normalised. 437,395 distinct spellings cover 11,236,429 claims; only letter case and spacing are merged, so “maize”, “corn” and “Zea mays L.” are three separate entries here. The By organism view merges spellings of one organism through NCBI Taxonomy.

1 claim

Open in search (filters, sorting) →

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L ycium ferocissimum survival was 19%.

Taxon: L ycium ferocissimume1
Outcome: survivale0
Value: 19%e0

Verbatim

e0
“survival of L . ferocissimum was low (19%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1477

e1
“L ycium ferocissimum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–766

Title

Active restoration of woody canopy dominants in degraded South African semi‐arid thicket is neither ecologically nor economically feasible

Marius L. van der Vyver; Richard M. Cowling; Eileen E. Campbell; et al. Applied Vegetation Science 2011. doi:10.1111/j.1654-109x.2011.01162.x

Other claims from this paper (8)

Observation Spring and autumn plantings of P appea capensis survived at less than 5%.
Observation Spring and autumn plantings of S earsia longispina survived at less than 5%.
Observation R higozum obovatum survival was 70%.
Observation P ortulacaria afra survival was 100%.
Association Survival was unrelated to the site intactness gradient.
Observation Adding four woody species cost 2.4 times as much as P . afra restoration alone.
Recommendation The authors judge planting other canopy species likely to make restoration economically unfeasible, depending on carbon price.
Recommendation The authors favor spontaneous recruitment for biodiversity goals, though it may take over 40 years.