Claim · model-written summary
SL2, SL3 and SL4 at 72 g AI ha −1 matched or improved ECM control of P. recondita on T. aestivum.
- Taxon
- T. aestivum.
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- SL2, SL3 and SL4 at 72 g AI ha −1e0
- Interactor
- P. recondita
Puccinia reconditae0 - Outcome
- control of P. reconditae0
- Direction
- matched or improvede0
- Comparator
- ECM at 120 g AI ha −1e0
Verbatim
e0“The results from trials in three locations showed that the commercially acceptable performance of ECM at 120 g AI ha −1 , in giving high levels of control of P. recondita, S. tritici and L. nodorum (both prophylactic and therapeutic activity) on T. aestivum. and of E. graminis and P. teres on H. vulgare , could be matched or improved by SL2, SL3 and SL4 at 72 g AI ha −1 .”
Title
Effect of adjuvants on the performance of the new cereal fungicide, metconazole. II Field trials
Alan J. Sampson; Adam F. Burnhams; B. Terence Grayson Pesticide Science 1995. doi:10.1002/ps.2780450210
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Intervention effect SL2, SL3 and SL4 at 72 g AI ha −1 matched or improved ECM control of S. tritici on T. aestivum.
- Intervention effect SL2, SL3 and SL4 at 72 g AI ha −1 matched or improved ECM control of L. nodorum on T. aestivum.
- Intervention effect SL2, SL3 and SL4 at 72 g AI ha −1 matched or improved ECM control of E. graminis on H. vulgare
- Intervention effect SL2, SL3 and SL4 at 72 g AI ha −1 matched or improved ECM control of P. teres on H. vulgare
- Intervention effect SL formulations improved control of E. graminis f. sp. tritici versus ECM, but therapeutic control remained commercially unacceptable.