Paper · 2009 · Biblioteca Digital do IPB (Instituto Politecnico De Braganca)

Ground cover and dynamic of weeds after the introduction of herbicides as soil management system in a rainfed olive orchard.

Manuel Ângelo Rodrigues; J.E. Cabanas; João I. Lopes; et al.

11
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

São apresentados resultados do grau de cobertura do solo e da dinâmica da vegetação num olival de sequeiro, localizado em Mirandela, após a introdução de herbicidas como estratégia de manutenção do solo. As modalidades em estudo foram: mobilização tradicional; herbicida pós-emergência (glifosato); e herbicida com componentes de acção residual e pós-emergência (diurão+glifosato+terbut ilazina). O grau de cobertura e a composição da vegetação foram avaliados desde 2002 a 2007 pelo método do ponto quadrado. Ambas as soluções herbicidas combateram adequadamente a vegetação herbácea em aplicação única anual. O grau de cobertura no talhão mobilizado, antes da primeira mobilização, oscilou entre 50 a 80 % e 30 a 60 % debaixo e fora da copa, respectivamente. O tratamento com glifosato permitiu um grau de cobertura em Abril entre 60 a 90 % debaixo da copa e 40 a 50 % fora da copa. No tratamento com herbicida residual o grau de cobertura do solo foi sempre muito baixo ao longo do ano. A gestão da vegetação com glifosato permitiu a cobertura do solo durante todo o ano, com vegetação viva desde o Outono à Primavera e um mulching de vegetação morta durante o Verão. Nas restantes modalidades o solo permaneceu descoberto durante grande parte do ano. No talhão gerido com glifosato a vegetação manteve elevada dinâmica. Um ano após o início da aplicação de glifosato apareceu a dominar o coberto Ornithopus compressus. Com o tempo ganharam importância algumas espécies de Inverno de ciclo muito curto (como Mibora mínima e Logfia gallica) e outras de elevada produção de sementes e fácil dispersão pelo vento (como Hypochaeris radicata e Conyza canadensis) com origem provável em incultos e caminhos que circundam o olival ou em plantas individuais que escaparam à acção dos herbicidas. Results of the percentage of ground cover by weeds and the dynamic of the vegetation are presented after the introduction of herbicides as soil management strategies in a rainfed olive orchard. The field experiment was carried out in Mirandela, NE Portugal. The soil management treatments included: conventional tillage; post-emergence herbicide (glyphosate); and post-emergence plus residual herbicide (diuron+glyphosate+terb utilazine). The ground cover percentage and the botanical composition of vegetation were monitored since 2002 to 2007 from the point-quadrat method. Both the herbicide formulations killed efficiently the vegetation in a single annual application. The ground cover percentages in conventional tillage, prior to the first tillage event, varied between 50 to 80 % beneath the trees and between 30 to 60 % in the open space. The ground cover percentages in April, in the treatment of glyphosate, were in the range of 60 to 90 % and 40 to 50 % beneath the trees and between rows, respectively. In the residual herbicide plot the ground cover percentages were always very low. The soil of the glyphosate plot was covered with vegetation over all the year. In au-tumn/spring the soil was covered with green weeds and in the summer with a mulching of the dead material. In the glyphosate plot the dynamic of species was high. One year after the first application of herbicide, Ornithopus compressus appeared as the most abundant species. Thereafter, acquired relevance species with short growing cycles which seeds mature before April (e.g. Mibora minima, Logfia gallica) and other that produce a high number of seeds easily spread by wind (e.g. Hypochaeris radicata, Conyza canadensis) and which seeds proceeded from surrounding untilled fields and rural-tracks or from individual plants that escaped to the herbicide control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both herbicide formulations efficiently killed weeds with one annual application.

Taxon
vegetatione0
Treatment
herbicide formulationse0
Outcome
killed efficiently the vegetatione0
Qualifier
single annual applicatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Both the herbicide formulations killed efficiently the vegetation in a single annual application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2367–2463 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–123 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Before tillage, weed cover beneath trees ranged from 50 to 80%.

Taxon
treese0
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
ground cover percentagese0
Value
50 to 80 %e0
Setting
beneath the treese0

Verbatim

e0

“The ground cover percentages in conventional tillage, prior to the first tillage event, varied between 50 to 80 % beneath the trees and between 30 to 60 % in the open space”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2465–2637 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Before tillage, weed cover in open space ranged from 30 to 60%.

Taxon
treese0
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
ground cover percentagese0
Value
30 to 60 %e0
Setting
open spacee0

Verbatim

e0

“The ground cover percentages in conventional tillage, prior to the first tillage event, varied between 50 to 80 % beneath the trees and between 30 to 60 % in the open space”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2465–2637 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate plot cover beneath trees was 60 to 90% in April.

Taxon
treese0
Treatment
glyphosatee0
Outcome
ground cover percentagese0
Value
60 to 90 %e0
Setting
beneath the treese0

Verbatim

e0

“The ground cover percentages in April, in the treatment of glyphosate, were in the range of 60 to 90 % and 40 to 50 % beneath the trees and between rows, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2639–2805 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate plot cover between rows was 40 to 50% in April.

Taxon
treese0
Treatment
glyphosatee0
Outcome
ground cover percentagese0
Value
40 to 50 %e0
Setting
between rowse0

Verbatim

e0

“The ground cover percentages in April, in the treatment of glyphosate, were in the range of 60 to 90 % and 40 to 50 % beneath the trees and between rows, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2639–2805 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual herbicide plots consistently had very low ground cover.

Treatment
residual herbicidee0
Outcome
ground cover percentagese0
Direction
very lowe0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In the residual herbicide plot the ground cover percentages were always very low”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2807–2887 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate plots retained vegetation cover throughout the year, with green weeds in autumn and spring and dead mulch in summer.

Taxon
vegetatione0
Treatment
glyphosatee0
Outcome
covered with vegetation over all the yeare0

Verbatim

e0

“The soil of the glyphosate plot was covered with vegetation over all the year. In au-tumn/spring the soil was covered with green weeds and in the summer with a mulching of the dead material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2889–3078 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Species dynamics were high in the glyphosate plot.

Treatment
glyphosatee0
Outcome
dynamic of species was highe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“In the glyphosate plot the dynamic of species was high”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3080–3134 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ornithopus compressus became most abundant one year after herbicide application.

Taxon
Ornithopus compressusOrnithopus compressuse0
Outcome
most abundant speciese0
Qualifier
One year after the first application of herbicidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ornithopus compressus
Ornithopus compressus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“One year after the first application of herbicide, Ornithopus compressus appeared as the most abundant species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3136–3246 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Short-cycle species Mibora minima and Logfia gallica gained relevance later.

Taxon
Mibora minimaMibora minimae0
Outcome
acquired relevancee0
Qualifier
short growing cyclese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mibora minima
Mibora minima · TaxonGabriele Kothe-Heinrich · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thereafter, acquired relevance species with short growing cycles which seeds mature before April (e.g. Mibora minima, Logfia gallica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3248–3381 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wind-dispersed high-seed-producing species Hypochaeris radicata and Conyza canadensis gained relevance later.

Taxon
Hypochaeris radicataHypochaeris radicatae0
Outcome
produce a high number of seeds easily spread by winde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hypochaeris radicata
Hypochaeris radicata · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“other that produce a high number of seeds easily spread by wind (e.g. Hypochaeris radicata, Conyza canadensis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3386–3496 · show in text ↑