Abstract
A study was conducted during 1996-97 to evaluate 9 upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) genotypes along with check variety 'LRA 5166' for stability in 4 agronornically differents environments. Pooled analysis revealed signficant differences among the cultivars, environments and environment (linear) for seed cotton Yield suggesting the presence of genetic variability in the cultivars, difference in environments under investigation aud their. predominant effect on yield. The genotype X environment interaction was highly significant suggesting that the genotypes interacted considerably with the environment in the expression of yield. The linear component of V x E was non-significant, indicates the genotypes responded non-linearly to the change in environment. The stability analysis for individual genotype showed 'GISC 86/58' was more stable for seed cotton yield followed by 'GJHS 34'
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Cultivars and environments differed significantly for seed cotton yield.
- Taxon
- upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)
Gossypium hirsutume1 - Outcome
- seed cotton Yielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pooled analysis revealed signficant differences among the cultivars, environments and environment (linear) for seed cotton Yield”
e1“upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Genotype by environment interaction for yield was highly significant.
- Taxon
- upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutume1
- Outcome
- genotypes interacted considerably with the environment in the expression of yielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The genotype X environment interaction was highly significant suggesting that the genotypes interacted considerably with the environment in the expression of yield.”
e1“upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The linear genotype by environment component was non-significant, suggesting nonlinear responses.
- Taxon
- upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutume1
- Outcome
- linear component of V x Ee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The linear component of V x E was non-significant, indicates the genotypes responded non-linearly to the change in environment.”
e1“upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
GISC 86/58 was the most stable for seed cotton yield, followed by GJHS 34.
- Taxon
- upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)Gossypium hirsutume1
- Material
- GISC 86/58e0
- Outcome
- seed cotton yielde0
- Direction
- more stablee0
- Comparator
- GJHS 34e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“'GISC 86/58' was more stable for seed cotton yield followed by 'GJHS 34'”
e1“upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”