Paper · 2009 · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES

Molecular characterization among strains of chickpea root nodule bacteria isolated from different areas of middle Gujarat.

V. R. Hinge; R. L. Chavhan; Y. A. Deshmukh; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Eighteen strains of Root nodule bacteria were collected from the chickpea plant, grown in different areas of middle Gujarat, viz., Anand, Dahod, Thasara, Arnej and Dhanduka. These strains were confirmed as Rhizobium by using different biochemical test and maintained their pure culture. Molecular characterization based on repetitive DNA sequence especially, ERIC sequence (Enterobacterial Repetitive Intergeneric Consensus) were done together with two known Rhizobium strains, one commercial culture (GSFC, Vadodara), five standard strains of Rhizobium and one standard strain of Agribacterium tumefacinus. The total of 320 no of amplicons was generated by using ERIC primer pair. The strain MTCC 4188 (Mesorhizobium ciceri) produced highest no of amplicons while strain MTCC 120 (Bradyrhizobium japonicum) showed a less no of amplicons. Data analysis of ERIC fingerprinting pattern clustered all RNB strains and standard strains into four major clusters as per their phylogenetic relationship. Majority of RNB strains (65 per cent) were closely related to the genus Mesorhizobium ciceri species and Mesorhizobium loti, while remaining 40 per cent RNB strains showed similarity to Rhizobium leguminosarum (MTCC 99) and Agrobacterium tumefaciens (MTCC 431). The ERIC-PCR fingerprinting could become a powerful tool for depicting the genetic diversity among eighteen RNB strains and standard strains. The data based on ERIC fingerprinting pattern could help to determine phylogenetic relationships among these RNB strains and will be helpful for development of diagnostic primer for identification of efficient strains of Chickpea Root Nodulating Bacteria.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ERIC fingerprinting clustered chickpea root nodule bacteria and standard strains into four major clusters by phylogenetic relationship.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Interactor
Root nodule bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
four major clusterse1
Qualifier
as per their phylogenetic relationshipe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eighteen strains of Root nodule bacteria were collected from the chickpea plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–79 · show in text ↑
e1

“Data analysis of ERIC fingerprinting pattern clustered all RNB strains and standard strains into four major clusters as per their phylogenetic relationship”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–994 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

65 per cent of chickpea root nodule bacteria strains were closely related to Mesorhizobium ciceri and Mesorhizobium loti.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
RNB strainse2
Interactor
Root nodule bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
closely related toe2
Value
65 per cente2
Qualifier
Mesorhizobium ciceri species and Mesorhizobium lotie2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eighteen strains of Root nodule bacteria were collected from the chickpea plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–79 · show in text ↑
e2

“Majority of RNB strains (65 per cent) were closely related to the genus Mesorhizobium ciceri species and Mesorhizobium loti”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The remaining 40 per cent of chickpea root nodule bacteria strains showed similarity to Rhizobium leguminosarum (MTCC 99) and Agrobacterium tumefaciens (MTCC 431).

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
RNB strainse3
Interactor
Root nodule bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
showed similarity toe3
Value
40 per cente3
Qualifier
Rhizobium leguminosarum (MTCC 99) and Agrobacterium tumefaciens (MTCC 431)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eighteen strains of Root nodule bacteria were collected from the chickpea plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–79 · show in text ↑
e3

“remaining 40 per cent RNB strains showed similarity to Rhizobium leguminosarum (MTCC 99) and Agrobacterium tumefaciens (MTCC 431)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1256 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain MTCC 4188 (Mesorhizobium ciceri) produced the highest number of ERIC amplicons among the strains.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
MTCC 4188e4
Interactor
Mesorhizobium ciceriMesorhizobium cicerie4symbiont
Outcome
no of ampliconse4
Direction
higheste4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eighteen strains of Root nodule bacteria were collected from the chickpea plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–79 · show in text ↑
e4

“The strain MTCC 4188 (Mesorhizobium ciceri) produced highest no of amplicons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–758 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain MTCC 120 (Bradyrhizobium japonicum) produced fewer ERIC amplicons than the other strains.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
MTCC 120e5
Interactor
Bradyrhizobium japonicumBradyrhizobium japonicume5symbiont
Outcome
no of ampliconse5
Direction
lesse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium japonicum
Bradyrhizobium japonicum · InteractorLouisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eighteen strains of Root nodule bacteria were collected from the chickpea plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–79 · show in text ↑
e5

“strain MTCC 120 (Bradyrhizobium japonicum) showed a less no of amplicons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–837 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ERIC primers generated a total of 320 amplicons across the chickpea root nodule bacteria and standard strains.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome
no of ampliconse6
Value
320e6
Qualifier
generated by using ERIC primer paire6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eighteen strains of Root nodule bacteria were collected from the chickpea plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–79 · show in text ↑
e6

“The total of 320 no of amplicons was generated by using ERIC primer pair”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–680 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ERIC-PCR fingerprinting could be a powerful tool for depicting genetic diversity among chickpea root nodule bacteria strains and standard strains.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome
genetic diversitye7
Comparator
standard strainse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eighteen strains of Root nodule bacteria were collected from the chickpea plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–79 · show in text ↑
e7

“The ERIC-PCR fingerprinting could become a powerful tool for depicting the genetic diversity among eighteen RNB strains and standard strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1398 · show in text ↑