Paper · 1999

Aphthona spp. movement and leafy spurge control along railroad right-of-ways

Jeff A. Nelson; Katheryn M. Christianson; Rodney G. Lym

12
claims
30
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.) is often found in long narrow corridors such as railroad right-of-ways and is difficult to treat. Two experiments were conducted to determine the establishment, population increase, and movement of Aphthona species flea beetles in confined area of leafy spurge. A. nigriscutis was released in a dense stand of leafy spurge along a railroad corridor on June 28, 1993. There were five treatments consisting of 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 adult insects released per treatment, plots were 80 m apart, and replicated three times along a 4 km stretch of railroad right-of-way. A. nigriscutis flea beetles were found in all treatments each year after release and leafy spurge stem density began to decline the second year after release. The greatest stem density decrease was 72% when 500 beetles/plot were released. A. nigriscutis rate of spread from the release point was similar regardless of the initial release number. A similar experiment was established on July 10, 1995 with a mixed population of A. czwalinae/lacertosa on a separate corridor. The number of insects released was increased to 500, 1000, 1500, and 2000 adults per treatment. A. czwalinae/lacertosa were found at all release points one year after release. The average stem density declined 71, 48, 60, and 23% within three m of the release point for the 2000, 1500, 1000, and 500 insect treatments, respectively. A. czwalinae/lacertosa were found at least 21 m from the release point within 2 years of the release. Aphthona spp established along the railroad right-of-ways and the rate of spread was similar regardless of the initial release number. However, the larger the release number the more rapid the leafy spurge stem density declined.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The greatest leafy spurge stem density decrease, 72%, followed release of 500 A. nigriscutis beetles per plot.

Taxon
Euphorbia esulaEuphorbia esulae0
Treatment
500 beetles/plote2
Interactor
A. nigriscutisAphthona nigriscutise1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
stem densitye2
Direction
decreasee2
Value
72%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Euphorbia esula
Euphorbia esula · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e1

“A. nigriscutis was released in a dense stand of leafy spurge along a railroad corridor on June 28, 1993”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–399 · show in text ↑
e2

“The greatest stem density decrease was 72% when 500 beetles/plot were released”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–842 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. nigriscutis flea beetles were found in all treatments each year after release on Euphorbia esula.

Taxon
Euphorbia esulaEuphorbia esulae0
Interactor
A. nigriscutisAphthona nigriscutise3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
flea beetles were found in all treatments each year after releasee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Euphorbia esula
Euphorbia esula · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e3

“A. nigriscutis flea beetles were found in all treatments each year after release”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–685 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leafy spurge stem density began to decline in the second year after A. nigriscutis release.

Taxon
Euphorbia esulaEuphorbia esulae0
Treatment
releasee3
Outcome
leafy spurge stem densitye4
Direction
declinee4
Qualifier
the second year after releasee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Euphorbia esula
Euphorbia esula · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e3

“A. nigriscutis flea beetles were found in all treatments each year after release”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–685 · show in text ↑
e4

“leafy spurge stem density began to decline the second year after release”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–762 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rate of spread of A. nigriscutis from the release point was similar regardless of the initial release number.

Taxon
Euphorbia esulaEuphorbia esulae0
Treatment
initial release numbere5
Interactor
A. nigriscutisAphthona nigriscutise5biocontrol_agent
Outcome
rate of spread from the release pointe5
Direction
similare5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Euphorbia esula
Euphorbia esula · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e5

“A. nigriscutis rate of spread from the release point was similar regardless of the initial release number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–949 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. czwalinae/lacertosa were found at all release points one year after release.

Taxon
Euphorbia esulaEuphorbia esulae0
Interactor
A. czwalinae/lacertosaAphthona czwalinaee7biocontrol_agent
Outcome
found at all release pointse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Euphorbia esula
Euphorbia esula · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e7

“A. czwalinae/lacertosa were found at all release points one year after release”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1253 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2000 insect treatment reduced average leafy spurge stem density by 71% within three m of the release point.

Taxon
Euphorbia esulaEuphorbia esulae0
Treatment
insect treatmentse2
Interactor
A. czwalinae/lacertosaAphthona czwalinaee6biocontrol_agent
Outcome
stem densitye2
Direction
declinede2
Value
71e2
Qualifier
2000e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Euphorbia esula
Euphorbia esula · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e6

“with a mixed population of A. czwalinae/lacertosa on a separate corridor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1077 · show in text ↑
e2

“The average stem density declined 71, 48, 60, and 23% within three m of the release point for the 2000, 1500, 1000, and 500 insect treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1500 insect treatment reduced average leafy spurge stem density by 48% within three m of the release point.

Taxon
Euphorbia esulaEuphorbia esulae0
Treatment
insect treatmentse2
Interactor
A. czwalinae/lacertosaAphthona czwalinaee6biocontrol_agent
Outcome
stem densitye2
Direction
declinede2
Value
48e2
Qualifier
1500e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Euphorbia esula
Euphorbia esula · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e6

“with a mixed population of A. czwalinae/lacertosa on a separate corridor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1077 · show in text ↑
e2

“The average stem density declined 71, 48, 60, and 23% within three m of the release point for the 2000, 1500, 1000, and 500 insect treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 1000 insect treatment reduced average leafy spurge stem density by 60% within three m of the release point.

Taxon
Euphorbia esulaEuphorbia esulae0
Treatment
insect treatmentse2
Interactor
A. czwalinae/lacertosaAphthona czwalinaee6biocontrol_agent
Outcome
stem densitye2
Direction
declinede2
Value
60e2
Qualifier
1000e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Euphorbia esula
Euphorbia esula · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e6

“with a mixed population of A. czwalinae/lacertosa on a separate corridor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1077 · show in text ↑
e2

“The average stem density declined 71, 48, 60, and 23% within three m of the release point for the 2000, 1500, 1000, and 500 insect treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 500 insect treatment reduced average leafy spurge stem density by 23% within three m of the release point.

Taxon
Euphorbia esulaEuphorbia esulae0
Treatment
insect treatmentse2
Interactor
A. czwalinae/lacertosaAphthona czwalinaee6biocontrol_agent
Outcome
stem densitye2
Direction
declinede2
Value
23%e2
Qualifier
500e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Euphorbia esula
Euphorbia esula · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e6

“with a mixed population of A. czwalinae/lacertosa on a separate corridor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1077 · show in text ↑
e2

“The average stem density declined 71, 48, 60, and 23% within three m of the release point for the 2000, 1500, 1000, and 500 insect treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1410 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. czwalinae/lacertosa were found at least 21 m from the release point within 2 years of release.

Taxon
Euphorbia esulaEuphorbia esulae0
Interactor
A. czwalinae/lacertosaAphthona czwalinaee1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
found at least 21 m from the release pointe1
Value
21 me1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Euphorbia esula
Euphorbia esula · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e1

“A. czwalinae/lacertosa were found at least 21 m from the release point within 2 years of the release”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1512 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphthona spp became established along the railroad right-of-ways.

Taxon
Euphorbia esulaEuphorbia esulae0
Interactor
Aphthona sppAphthonae1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
established along the railroad right-of-wayse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Euphorbia esula
Euphorbia esula · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphthona
Aphthona · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e1

“Aphthona spp established along the railroad right-of-ways”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1571 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A larger release number led to a more rapid decline of leafy spurge stem density.

Taxon
Euphorbia esulaEuphorbia esulae0
Treatment
release numbere1
Outcome
leafy spurge stem densitye1
Direction
more rapide1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Euphorbia esula
Euphorbia esula · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
e1

“the larger the release number the more rapid the leafy spurge stem density declined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1658–1741 · show in text ↑