Paper · 2008 · Zhongguo nongye Kexue

Competitive effects between Ageratina adenophora (Asteraceae) and Setaria sphacelata (Gramineae).

Zhilin Jiang; Wanxue Liu; Wan FangHao; et al.

11
claims
11
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

【Objective】 The experiment was conducted to investigate the inter-specific competitive interaction between Ageratina adenophora (Sprengel) and Setaria sphacelata (Schum) at different densities, and to explore the methods of controlling the invasive weed A. adenophora displaced by S. sphacelata.【Method】 The above two perennial species were grown for 2 years in monoculture and mixture on an experimental densities gradient. The above-and blow-ground biomass of the two species were measured and the growth response and relative competitive ability were evaluated.【Result】 The total biomass, relative yield and competitive balance index of S. sphacelata were significantly higher than those of A. adenophora, the relative yield total was significantly lower than 1. The relationships mentioned above become more obvious with decreasing of experimental plant community densities. The total biomass of A. adenophora at the densities of 20, 45 and 175 plants/m2 in mixture decreased by 33.0%, 38.5% and 70.1% compared to those in monoculture, respectively. However, the total biomass of S. sphacelata at the same density between monoculture and mixture showed no significant difference. The ratios of root mass vs shoot mass of S. sphacelata in mixture were significantly lower than those in monoculture. However, the ratios of root mass vs shoot mass of A. adenophora in the mixture were significantly higher than those in monoculture【.Conclusion】There was a significant mutual antagonism between A. adenophora and S. sphacelata compared to A. adenophora, the relative competitive ability of S. sphacelata was higher, which decreased heavily the growth of A. adenophora mainly by shoot competition. It will be a promising strategy for replacement control of A. adenophora by using S. sphacelata as a competitor.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Setaria sphacelata had higher total biomass, relative yield and competitive balance index than Ageratina adenophora.

Taxon
S. sphacelataSetaria sphacelatae0
Interactor
A. adenophoraAgeratina adenophorae0weed
Outcome
total biomass, relative yield and competitive balance indexe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
A. adenophorae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria sphacelata
Setaria sphacelata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ageratina adenophora
Ageratina adenophora · InteractorIxitixel · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total biomass, relative yield and competitive balance index of S. sphacelata were significantly higher than those of A. adenophora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–707 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative yield total was below one.

Outcome
relative yield totale0
Direction
lowere0
Value
1e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the relative yield total was significantly lower than 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–764 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The competitive relationships were more pronounced at lower community densities.

Outcome
relationships mentioned abovee0
Direction
more obviouse0
Setting
experimental plant community densitiese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The relationships mentioned above become more obvious with decreasing of experimental plant community densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–877 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ageratina biomass in mixture fell 33.0% at 20 plants/m2 versus monoculture.

Taxon
A. adenophoraAgeratina adenophorae0
Treatment
mixturee0
Outcome
total biomasse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
33.0%e0
Qualifier
20e0
Comparator
monoculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ageratina adenophora
Ageratina adenophora · TaxonIxitixel · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total biomass of A. adenophora at the densities of 20, 45 and 175 plants/m2 in mixture decreased by 33.0%, 38.5% and 70.1% compared to those in monoculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1038 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ageratina biomass in mixture fell 38.5% at 45 plants/m2 versus monoculture.

Taxon
A. adenophoraAgeratina adenophorae0
Treatment
mixturee0
Outcome
total biomasse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
38.5%e0
Qualifier
45e0
Comparator
monoculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ageratina adenophora
Ageratina adenophora · TaxonIxitixel · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total biomass of A. adenophora at the densities of 20, 45 and 175 plants/m2 in mixture decreased by 33.0%, 38.5% and 70.1% compared to those in monoculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1038 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ageratina biomass in mixture fell 70.1% at 175 plants/m2 versus monoculture.

Taxon
A. adenophoraAgeratina adenophorae0
Treatment
mixturee0
Outcome
total biomasse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
70.1%e0
Qualifier
175e0
Comparator
monoculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ageratina adenophora
Ageratina adenophora · TaxonIxitixel · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total biomass of A. adenophora at the densities of 20, 45 and 175 plants/m2 in mixture decreased by 33.0%, 38.5% and 70.1% compared to those in monoculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1038 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Setaria biomass did not differ significantly between mixture and monoculture.

Taxon
S. sphacelataSetaria sphacelatae0
Treatment
mixturee0
Outcome
total biomasse0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
monoculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria sphacelata
Setaria sphacelata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the total biomass of S. sphacelata at the same density between monoculture and mixture showed no significant difference”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Setaria root-to-shoot mass ratio was lower in mixture than monoculture.

Taxon
S. sphacelataSetaria sphacelatae0
Treatment
mixturee0
Outcome
ratios of root mass vs shoot masse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
monoculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Setaria sphacelata
Setaria sphacelata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ratios of root mass vs shoot mass of S. sphacelata in mixture were significantly lower than those in monoculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1300 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ageratina root-to-shoot mass ratio was higher in mixture than monoculture.

Taxon
A. adenophoraAgeratina adenophorae0
Treatment
mixturee0
Outcome
ratios of root mass vs shoot masse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
monoculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ageratina adenophora
Ageratina adenophora · TaxonIxitixel · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the ratios of root mass vs shoot mass of A. adenophora in the mixture were significantly higher than those in monoculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1432 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed suppression of Ageratina growth mainly to shoot competition from Setaria.

Taxon
A. adenophoraAgeratina adenophorae0
Interactor
S. sphacelataSetaria sphacelatae0weed
Outcome
growth of A. adenophorae0
Qualifier
shoot competitione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ageratina adenophora
Ageratina adenophora · TaxonIxitixel · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Setaria sphacelata
Setaria sphacelata · InteractorForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the relative competitive ability of S. sphacelata was higher, which decreased heavily the growth of A. adenophora mainly by shoot competition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1554–1695 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors proposed Setaria as a competitor for replacement control of Ageratina.

Taxon
A. adenophoraAgeratina adenophorae0
Interactor
S. sphacelataSetaria sphacelatae0weed
Outcome
replacement control of A. adenophorae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ageratina adenophora
Ageratina adenophora · TaxonIxitixel · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Setaria sphacelata
Setaria sphacelata · InteractorForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It will be a promising strategy for replacement control of A. adenophora by using S. sphacelata as a competitor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1697–1808 · show in text ↑