Paper · 1979

The White Pine-Hardwood Vegetation Types of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park

Harry R. DeYoung

1
claims
2
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The white pine-hardwood type was described by Miller in 1938; however , subsequent researchers o f the vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park have not described this type. A field study o f white pine-hardwood vegetation was conducted in the Park from J1�1e to October, 1977. �he objectives were to relocate and plot sample the white pine-hardwood stands to l) group samples into vegetation types based upon the importance of white pine and its associated taxa , 2) use quantitative vegetation analysis procedure s to describe the white pine­ hardwood vegetation types, 3 ) asse s s the re lat ionship o f the vegetation types to environmental characteristics , 4 ) examine the succes s ional status of the type s , and 5) provide a basis for further e cological studie s of these t ypes in the Park. Data were analyzed from 144 s ample plot locations in the western portion of the Park in Tennessee at low to middle e levations (312 to 716 meters). Circular 0 . 0406 hectare (l/10 acre) plots were located in areas which had been previously mapped by Miller in 1941. Canopy (over 10 ern), sapling (2.5 to 10 em) , subsapling ( 2 . 5 ern diameter and one meter high) , and herbaceous data were tallied in each plot . Site properties were collected in each plot. Laboratory determinations o f soil pH and texture o f bot� the A and B horizons were made. Canopy data were used to group plots into vegetation type s using an agglomerative c lustering technique ( Orloci, 1967). The seven corrmunitie s identified were: white pine-Virginia pine , white pine-red maple , white pine-hemlock, white pine-chestnut oak, white pine-white

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 1

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven white pine-hardwood communities were identified.

Taxon
white pinet0
Outcome
seven corrmunitie s identifiede0

Verbatim

e0

“The seven corrmunitie s identified were: white pine-Virginia pine , white pine-red maple , white pine-hemlock, white pine-chestnut oak, white pine-white”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1642 · show in text ↑
t0

“white pine”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 4–14 · show in text ↑