Paper · 2008 · International Journal of Agriculture and Biology

Effects of tillage and intercropping with grass on soil properties and yield of rainfed maize.

Yugi R. Ahadiyat; S. L. Ranamukhaarachchi

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Maize is grown as a rainfed crop during wet and dry seasons in Lampung, Indonesia and gives low yield. This study was conducted to determine the effects of intercropping with grasses and tillage practices on soil physical properties and grain yield in the wet season. Three tillage methods i.e. no tillage, conventional tillage and deep tillage and four cropping patterns; sole maize, maize intercropped with clump grass (Vetiveria zizanoides), elephant grass (Pennisetum purpureum), and lemon grass (Cymbopogon citratus) were tested. Both conventional and deep tillage increased yield components and harvest index of maize compared to no tillage, but grain yield remained unchanged among cropping patterns. Deep tillage maintained lower bulk density and greater porosity and organic C in deep soils than conventional and no tillage. Maize intercropped with clump grass decreased bulk density and increased porosity and organic C compared to other cropping patterns. This enhanced the soil capacity to store and mobilizes water and nutrients in deep soil profiles, which is likely to enhance growth and yield of the succeeding maize crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage increased maize yield components and harvest index relative to no tillage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
conventionale0
Outcome
yield components and harvest indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
no tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both conventional and deep tillage increased yield components and harvest index of maize compared to no tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–646 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage increased maize yield components and harvest index relative to no tillage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
deep tillagee0
Outcome
yield components and harvest indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
no tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both conventional and deep tillage increased yield components and harvest index of maize compared to no tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–646 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize grain yield did not vary among cropping patterns.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
cropping patternse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
unchangede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield remained unchanged among cropping patterns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–706 · show in text ↑
e1

“sole maize, maize intercropped with clump grass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–420 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage produced lower deep soil bulk density than conventional and no tillage.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Deep tillagee0
Outcome
bulk densitye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
conventional and no tillagee0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deep tillage maintained lower bulk density and greater porosity and organic C in deep soils than conventional and no tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–832 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maize is grown as a rainfed crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep tillage produced greater deep soil porosity and organic C than conventional and no tillage.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Deep tillagee0
Outcome
porosity and organic Ce0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
conventional and no tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deep tillage maintained lower bulk density and greater porosity and organic C in deep soils than conventional and no tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–832 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maize is grown as a rainfed crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clump grass intercropping decreased soil bulk density versus other patterns.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
intercropped with clump grasse0
Interactor
clump grasse0weed
Outcome
bulk densitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
other cropping patternse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize intercropped with clump grass decreased bulk density and increased porosity and organic C compared to other cropping patterns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–965 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clump grass intercropping increased soil porosity and organic C versus other patterns.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayse0
Treatment
intercropped with clump grasse0
Interactor
clump grasse0weed
Outcome
porosity and organic Ce0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
other cropping patternse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maize intercropped with clump grass decreased bulk density and increased porosity and organic C compared to other cropping patterns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–965 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The soil changes were considered likely to improve water and nutrient storage and subsequent maize growth and yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Qualifier
soil capacity to store and mobilizes water and nutrientse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This enhanced the soil capacity to store and mobilizes water and nutrients in deep soil profiles, which is likely to enhance growth and yield of the succeeding maize crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1137 · show in text ↑

tillage · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

152 papers: 124 positive, 28 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

148 papers more in this group

See all 152 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

intercropping · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

26 papers: 26 positive, 0 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.