Paper · 1999 · The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences

Comparison of lignin and IVDMD technique for estimation of dry matter intake and digestibility in range managed sheep

A.K. Shinde; S. K. Sankhyan; Raghavendra Bhatta; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The study was conducted to compare lignin ratio (LR) and in vitro DM digestibility (IVDMD) techniques as methods for estimating in vivo DMI and digestibility of pasture vegetation in range managed sheep. Four intact and 2 oesophageal cannulated rams were allowed to graze on cenchrus pasture throughout the year. The digestion trials were conducted in monsoon, winter and summer. In each trial total faeces from 4 intact ram was collected for 5 days by titting harness and faecal bags. During the same period diet samples. were collected from 2 oesophageal cannulated rams. Lignin content of oesophageal extrusa increased from monsoon to winter and summer with similar seasonal trends in its voidance in the faeces. The faecal output also varied in the seasons commensurating with DMI of the animals. Correlation coefficient of faecal output with DMI of animals pooled for 3 seasons and 2 methods were 0.89, DMI was over estimated by 4.8 % in monsoon and 7.3 % in summer using IVDMD compared to LR method, while DMD estimated by both the methods was similar in winter. Similar seasonal trends were observed in estimation of DMI by the 2 methods from total faecal DM voided. The DMI could be predicted with 91-93% confidence by the 2 faecal sampling methods. Thus it is concluded that rVDMD and LR methods estimate similar DMI and DMD in grazing sheep.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Faecal output and dry matter intake of grazing sheep were correlated at 0.89 across seasons and methods.

Taxon
cenchrusCenchruse0
Outcome
Correlation coefficient of faecal output with DMIe1
Value
0.89e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus
Cenchrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“allowed to graze on cenchrus pasture throughout the year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–311 · show in text ↑
e1

“Correlation coefficient of faecal output with DMI of animals pooled for 3 seasons and 2 methods were 0.89”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–906 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In monsoon, the IVDMD method over-estimated DMI by 4.8 % compared with the LR method.

Taxon
cenchrusCenchruse0
Treatment
IVDMDe2
Outcome
DMIe2
Direction
over estimatede2
Value
4.8 %e2
Comparator
LR methode2
Setting
monsoone2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus
Cenchrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“allowed to graze on cenchrus pasture throughout the year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–311 · show in text ↑
e2

“DMI was over estimated by 4.8 % in monsoon and 7.3 % in summer using IVDMD compared to LR method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1004 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In summer, the IVDMD method over-estimated DMI by 7.3 % compared with the LR method.

Taxon
cenchrusCenchruse0
Treatment
IVDMDe2
Outcome
DMIe2
Direction
over estimatede2
Value
7.3 %e2
Comparator
LR methode2
Setting
summere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus
Cenchrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“allowed to graze on cenchrus pasture throughout the year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–311 · show in text ↑
e2

“DMI was over estimated by 4.8 % in monsoon and 7.3 % in summer using IVDMD compared to LR method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1004 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In winter, DMD estimated by both methods was similar.

Taxon
cenchrusCenchruse0
Outcome
DMDe3
Direction
similare3
Comparator
both the methodse3
Setting
wintere3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus
Cenchrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“allowed to graze on cenchrus pasture throughout the year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–311 · show in text ↑
e3

“while DMD estimated by both the methods was similar in winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1067 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seasonal trends in DMI estimated by the two methods were similar.

Taxon
cenchrusCenchruse0
Outcome
estimation of DMIe4
Direction
Similare4
Comparator
the 2 methodse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus
Cenchrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“allowed to graze on cenchrus pasture throughout the year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–311 · show in text ↑
e4

“Similar seasonal trends were observed in estimation of DMI by the 2 methods from total faecal DM voided”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1172 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DMI could be predicted with 91-93% confidence by the two faecal sampling methods.

Taxon
cenchrusCenchruse0
Outcome
DMIe5
Value
91-93%e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus
Cenchrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“allowed to graze on cenchrus pasture throughout the year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–311 · show in text ↑
e5

“The DMI could be predicted with 91-93% confidence by the 2 faecal sampling methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1256 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that the rVDMD and LR methods estimate similar DMI and DMD in grazing sheep.

Taxon
cenchrusCenchruse0
Outcome
DMI and DMDe6
Direction
similare6
Comparator
LR methodse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus
Cenchrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“allowed to graze on cenchrus pasture throughout the year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 255–311 · show in text ↑
e6

“Thus it is concluded that rVDMD and LR methods estimate similar DMI and DMD in grazing sheep”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1350 · show in text ↑