Paper · 2013 · Acta Horticulturae

SCREENING AND BREEDING FOR GENETIC RESISTANCE TO ANTHRACNOSE IN MANGO

I.S.E. Bally; C.N. Akem; N.L. Dillon; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
13
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Postharvest diseases remain a significant constraint to the transport, storage and marketing of mangoes. The two main ones are anthracnose and stem end rot. Anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides is the more wide-spread of the two. Varieties within Mangifera indica are known to vary in their level of reactions to anthracnose; however, the best tolerance in current commercial cultivars is not sufficient to eliminate the need for pre- and postharvest fungicides treatments. A screening program was initiated in mango accessions in the Australian National Mango Genebank to look for any significant resistance to C. gloeosporioides in fruit as they ripened. Screening was conducted by rating reactions to natural infection of anthracnose and reactions to artificially inoculating fruit with virulent isolates of C. gloeosporioides. A range of reactions to the pathogen were identified, with strong resistance found in one accession of the species M. laurina. This accession was used as the pollen parent in a controlled crossing program with a M. indica hybrid from the Australian Mango Breeding Program (AMBP). Sixty successful hybrids between the species have been generated. The hybrid population will be screened for resistance to anthracnose and used for gene discovery investigations to identify markers for anthracnose resistance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A range of reactions to the anthracnose pathogen was found among screened mango accessions.

Outcome
reactions to the pathogene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“MANGO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“A range of reactions to the pathogen were identified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–899 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strong resistance to the pathogen was found in one accession of Mangifera laurina.

Taxon
M. laurinaMangifera laurinae0
Material
one accessione0
Outcome
strong resistancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera laurina
Mangifera laurina · TaxonAsit K. Ghosh Thaumaturgist · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“MANGO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“strong resistance found in one accession of the species M. laurina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–972 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sixty successful hybrids between the two mango species were generated in the crossing program.

Outcome
successful hybridse0
Value
Sixtye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“MANGO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sixty successful hybrids between the species have been generated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1191 · show in text ↑