Paper · 2013 · International Journal of Biosciences (IJB)

Distribution of dominant weed species in winter wheat at Tabriz county

13
claims
23
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Weed flora surveys were conducted to determine the distribution of dominant weed species in wheat (Tirticum aestivum L.) fields at Tabriz county. Only 3.91% of weeds were assertive and observed in more than 60% of fields, but 89.84% of weeds were found in less than 30% of fields. Assertive weeds were corresponding with 13 abundant weed species. These weeds were adapted to farmer’s management methods. The major families for these noxious weeds were Chenopodiaceae, Brassicaceae, and Poaceae with 3, 2, and 2 dominant species, respectively. Acroptilon repens (L.) DC., Eremopyrum Bonaepartis (Spreng.) Nevski, and Cardaria draba (L.) Desv. with 114.1, 105.48, and 100.39 DI (dominance index) were dominant in winter wheat fields at Tabriz county. A. repens (L.) DC. and C. draba (L.) Desv. had highest relationship together. Also, highest correlation was observed between Polygonum aviculare L. and Chenopodium album L. These weeds were observed in more than 60% of fields. E. Bonaepartis (Spreng.) Nevski with mean density 3.26 plants m -2 had highest density, higher values of density shows that this weed has more competitive or reproductive ability than other weeds. And also, higher value of uniformity for E. Bonaepartis (Spreng.) Nevski represents that this weed is more compatible with the soil and climate conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only 3.91% of weed species occurred in more than 60% of wheat fields.

Outcome
weeds were assertive and observed in more than 60% of fieldse0
Value
3.91%e0
Setting
Tabriz countyt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only 3.91% of weeds were assertive and observed in more than 60% of fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–220 · show in text ↑
t0

“Distribution of dominant weed species in winter wheat at Tabriz county”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

89.84% of weeds occurred in less than 30% of fields.

Outcome
weeds were found in less than 30% of fieldse0
Value
89.84%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“89.84% of weeds were found in less than 30% of fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–279 · show in text ↑
t0

“Distribution of dominant weed species in winter wheat at Tabriz county”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

There were 13 abundant assertive weed species.

Outcome
abundant weed speciese0
Value
13e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Assertive weeds were corresponding with 13 abundant weed species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–345 · show in text ↑
t0

“Distribution of dominant weed species in winter wheat at Tabriz county”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chenopodiaceae had three dominant weed species.

Interactor
ChenopodiaceaeAmaranthaceaee0weed
Outcome
dominant speciese0
Value
3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chenopodiaceae, Brassicaceae, and Poaceae with 3, 2, and 2 dominant species, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–541 · show in text ↑
t0

“Distribution of dominant weed species in winter wheat at Tabriz county”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brassicaceae had two dominant weed species.

Interactor
BrassicaceaeBrassicaceaee0weed
Outcome
dominant speciese0
Value
2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brassicaceae, and Poaceae with 3, 2, and 2 dominant species, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–541 · show in text ↑
t0

“Distribution of dominant weed species in winter wheat at Tabriz county”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poaceae had two dominant weed species.

Interactor
PoaceaePoaceaee0weed
Outcome
dominant speciese0
Value
2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Poaceae with 3, 2, and 2 dominant species, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–541 · show in text ↑
t0

“Distribution of dominant weed species in winter wheat at Tabriz county”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acroptilon repens had a dominance index of 114.1 in winter wheat fields.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Interactor
Acroptilon repensLeuzea repense0weed
Outcome
dominance indexe0
Value
114.1e0
Setting
Tabriz countye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Leuzea repens
Leuzea repens · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Acroptilon repens (L.) DC., Eremopyrum Bonaepartis (Spreng.) Nevski, and Cardaria draba (L.) Desv. with 114.1, 105.48, and 100.39 DI (dominance index) were dominant in winter wheat fields at Tabriz county”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–747 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eremopyrum Bonaepartis had a dominance index of 105.48 in winter wheat fields.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Interactor
Eremopyrum BonaepartisEremopyrum bonaepartise0weed
Outcome
dominance indexe0
Value
105.48e0
Setting
Tabriz countye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Acroptilon repens (L.) DC., Eremopyrum Bonaepartis (Spreng.) Nevski, and Cardaria draba (L.) Desv. with 114.1, 105.48, and 100.39 DI (dominance index) were dominant in winter wheat fields at Tabriz county”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–747 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cardaria draba had a dominance index of 100.39 in winter wheat fields.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Interactor
Cardaria drabaLepidium drabae0weed
Outcome
dominance indexe0
Value
100.39e0
Setting
Tabriz countye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lepidium draba
Lepidium draba · InteractorKurt Stüber [1] · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Acroptilon repens (L.) DC., Eremopyrum Bonaepartis (Spreng.) Nevski, and Cardaria draba (L.) Desv. with 114.1, 105.48, and 100.39 DI (dominance index) were dominant in winter wheat fields at Tabriz county”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–747 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acroptilon repens and Cardaria draba had the strongest relationship.

Interactor
A. repensLeuzea repense0weed
Second interactor
C. drabaLepidium drabae0weed
Outcome
highest relationship togethere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Leuzea repens
Leuzea repens · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lepidium draba
Lepidium draba · Second interactorKurt Stüber [1] · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A. repens (L.) DC. and C. draba (L.) Desv. had highest relationship together”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–825 · show in text ↑
t0

“Distribution of dominant weed species in winter wheat at Tabriz county”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polygonum aviculare and Chenopodium album showed the highest correlation.

Interactor
Polygonum avicularePolygonum avicularee0weed
Second interactor
Chenopodium albumChenopodium albume0weed
Outcome
highest correlatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Polygonum aviculare
Polygonum aviculare · InteractorDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · Second interactorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest correlation was observed between Polygonum aviculare L. and Chenopodium album L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–921 · show in text ↑
t0

“Distribution of dominant weed species in winter wheat at Tabriz county”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eremopyrum Bonaepartis had the highest mean weed density, 3.26 plants m -2.

Interactor
E. Bonaepartise0weed
Outcome
mean densitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.26 plants m -2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“E. Bonaepartis (Spreng.) Nevski with mean density 3.26 plants m -2 had highest density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1062 · show in text ↑
t0

“Distribution of dominant weed species in winter wheat at Tabriz county”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–70 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eremopyrum Bonaepartis had higher uniformity, interpreted as greater compatibility with soil and climate conditions.

Interactor
E. Bonaepartise0weed
Outcome
uniformitye0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher value of uniformity for E. Bonaepartis (Spreng.) Nevski represents that this weed is more compatible with the soil and climate conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1327 · show in text ↑
t0

“Distribution of dominant weed species in winter wheat at Tabriz county”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–70 · show in text ↑