Paper · 2000 · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Prognosis of iron chlorosis from the mineral composition of ¯owers in peach

Ernesto Igartua; Roberto Grasa; Manuel Sanz; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
35
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SummaryA statistical approach has been applied to study the nutrient composition of flowers in a peach orchard with 50 peach trees suffering from different degrees of Fe deficiency. Flowers from each individual tree were analysed in five crop seasons. The existence of a consistent nutrient balance over years in peach flowers, with nutrient concentrations depending to some extent on the levels of other nutrients, was revealed by a principal component-type analysis. The analysis produced a dominant first principal component, which explained 21% of the total variance. The second component explained 13% of the variance, with further components explaining less than 9%. A regression analysis revealed that the first principal component was closely related to chlorophyll (Chl) concentration determined in leaves 120 d after full bloom, as it explained 59% of average Chl concentration variance (between 40 and 52% in single year analysis), which is equivalent to a correlation coefficient of 0.77. A multiple regressi...

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peach flowers showed a consistent nutrient balance across years, with some nutrient concentrations depending on other nutrients.

Organ / stage
flowerse0
Compound
other nutrientse0
Outcome
nutrient concentrationse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The existence of a consistent nutrient balance over years in peach flowers, with nutrient concentrations depending to some extent on the levels of other nutrients, was revealed by a principal component-type analysis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–468 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The first principal component explained 21% of nutrient composition variance.

Outcome
total variancee0
Value
21%e0
Qualifier
first principal componente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The analysis produced a dominant first principal component, which explained 21% of the total variance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–571 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The second principal component explained 13% of variance.

Outcome
variancee0
Value
13%e0
Qualifier
second componente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The second component explained 13% of the variance, with further components explaining less than 9%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–672 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Further principal components each explained less than 9% of variance.

Outcome
variancee0
Value
less than 9%e0
Qualifier
further componentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The second component explained 13% of the variance, with further components explaining less than 9%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–672 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The first principal component explained 59% of mean leaf chlorophyll variance and correlated with chlorophyll at 0.77.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
Chl concentration variancee0
Value
59%e0
Qualifier
between 40 and 52% in single year analysise0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A regression analysis revealed that the first principal component was closely related to chlorophyll (Chl) concentration determined in leaves 120 d after full bloom, as it explained 59% of average Chl concentration variance (between 40 and 52% in single year analysis), which is equivalent to a correlation coefficient of 0.77.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑