Paper · 1997 · Northwest Irrigation & Soils Research Laboratory Publications (United States Department of Agriculture)

Fertilizer source and crop rotation effects on beans grown on recently exposed subsoils

C. W. Robbins; L. L. Freeborn

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Irrigation induced erosion and land leveling have reduced yields on about 2 million acres in south central Idaho. Previous attempts to restore productivity on eroded silt loam soils to that of the original top soil have not been successful. This long term study was conducted to find a method(s) that would restore the productivity of exposed subsoils to that of topsoils and to determine the factor(s) limiting subsoil productivity. This study was initiated by removing the surface 12 inches of topsoil in strips between undisturbed strips of Portneuf silt loam (coarse-silty, mixed, mesic, Durixerollic Calciorthid) topsoil. Different crop rotations were established along the strips and fertilizer treatments were applied across the strips. Fertilizer treatments were applied the first year and were, conventional fertilizer applied according to soil tests, a heavy fresh dairy manure application and two cottage cheese (acid) whey rates. Dry edible beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Viva) were grown on the entire plot area the forth year as the test crop. Crop rotations did not significantly effect overall bean yields the fourth year after topsoil removal. Applying 60 tons of dairy manure acre' (air dry basis) was the only treatment that restored bean production to that of the topsoil. Plant Zn and soil organic carbon were the only factors measured that correlated with bean yield increases on the subsoil plots.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop rotations did not significantly affect fourth-year bean yields.

Taxon
beane0
Treatment
Crop rotationse0
Outcome
bean yieldse0
Direction
did not significantly effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Crop rotations did not significantly effect overall bean yields the fourth year after topsoil removal.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1162 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dairy manure restored bean production on subsoil to topsoil levels.

Taxon
beane0
Treatment
60 tons of dairy manure acre'e0
Outcome
bean productione0
Direction
restorede0
Comparator
topsoile0

Verbatim

e0

“Applying 60 tons of dairy manure acre' (air dry basis) was the only treatment that restored bean production to that of the topsoil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1294 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant Zn correlated with bean yield increases on subsoil plots.

Taxon
beane0
Compound
Zne0
Outcome
bean yield increasese0
Direction
increasese0

Verbatim

e0

“Plant Zn and soil organic carbon were the only factors measured that correlated with bean yield increases on the subsoil plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1422 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic carbon correlated with bean yield increases on subsoil plots.

Taxon
beane0
Compound
soil organic carbone0
Outcome
bean yield increasese0
Direction
increasese0

Verbatim

e0

“Plant Zn and soil organic carbon were the only factors measured that correlated with bean yield increases on the subsoil plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1422 · show in text ↑

rotation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

fertilization · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

376 papers: 331 positive, 45 negative or no effect

330 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

372 papers more in this group

See all 376 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.