Abstract
Among bio-pesticides, bio-agent and neem based insecticides neemarin @ 3.0 lit/ha performed best with infestation of 17.1% (20 DAS) and 18.9% (40 DAS), leaf injury rating 3.1 (20 DAS) and 3.3 (40 DAS), number of dead hearts 5.1 (20 DAS) and 5.9 (40 DAS) and 16.9% of dead hearts (40 DAS). This treatment gave grain yield (30.32 q/ha), net returns (Rs.7935.00/ha) and cost benefit ratio (6.1). However, imidacloprid (17.8% SL @ 150 ml/ha) was found best among all the treatments with minimum infestation of 15.3% (20 DAS) and 16.5% (40 DAS), minimum leaf injury rating 2.1 (20 DAS) and 2.4 (40 DAS), minimum number of dead hearts 2.0 (20 DAS) and 2.6 (40 DAS) and minimum 7.4% of dead hearts (40 DAS). This treatment was also found best among all the treatments with maximum grain yield (36.29 q/ha), maximum net returns (Rs. 11185.00/ha) and highest cost benefit ratio (9.9).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 20
Claim · model-written summary
Neemarin at 3.0 lit/ha had 17.1% Chilo partellus infestation at 20 DAS in maize.
- Treatment
- neemarin @ 3.0 lit/hae1
- Interactor
- Chilo partellus
_Figure_27c.jpg?width=60)
Chilo partellust0pest - Outcome
- infestatione1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 17.1%e1
- Qualifier
- 20 DASe1
- Comparator
- bio-pesticidese1
- Setting
- Fieldt0
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Figure_27c.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Field evaluation of bio-agents against Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in maize.”
e1“Among bio-pesticides, bio-agent and neem based insecticides neemarin @ 3.0 lit/ha performed best with infestation of 17.1% (20 DAS) and 18.9% (40 DAS), leaf injury rating 3.1 (20 DAS) and 3.3 (40 DAS), number of dead hearts 5.1 (20 DAS) and 5.9 (40 DAS) and 16.9% of dead hearts (40 DAS)”
Claim · model-written summary
Neemarin at 3.0 lit/ha had 18.9% Chilo partellus infestation at 40 DAS in maize.
- Treatment
- neemarin @ 3.0 lit/hae1
- Interactor
- Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
- Outcome
- infestatione1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 18.9%e1
- Qualifier
- 40 DASe1
- Comparator
- bio-pesticidese1
- Setting
- Fieldt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Field evaluation of bio-agents against Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in maize.”
e1“Among bio-pesticides, bio-agent and neem based insecticides neemarin @ 3.0 lit/ha performed best with infestation of 17.1% (20 DAS) and 18.9% (40 DAS), leaf injury rating 3.1 (20 DAS) and 3.3 (40 DAS), number of dead hearts 5.1 (20 DAS) and 5.9 (40 DAS) and 16.9% of dead hearts (40 DAS)”
Claim · model-written summary
Neemarin at 3.0 lit/ha gave leaf injury rating 3.1 at 20 DAS in maize.
- Treatment
- neemarin @ 3.0 lit/hae1
- Interactor
- Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
- Outcome
- leaf injury ratinge1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 3.1e1
- Qualifier
- 20 DASe1
- Comparator
- bio-pesticidese1
- Setting
- Fieldt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Field evaluation of bio-agents against Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in maize.”
e1“Among bio-pesticides, bio-agent and neem based insecticides neemarin @ 3.0 lit/ha performed best with infestation of 17.1% (20 DAS) and 18.9% (40 DAS), leaf injury rating 3.1 (20 DAS) and 3.3 (40 DAS), number of dead hearts 5.1 (20 DAS) and 5.9 (40 DAS) and 16.9% of dead hearts (40 DAS)”
Claim · model-written summary
Neemarin at 3.0 lit/ha gave leaf injury rating 3.3 at 40 DAS in maize.
- Treatment
- neemarin @ 3.0 lit/hae1
- Interactor
- Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
- Outcome
- leaf injury ratinge1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 3.3e1
- Qualifier
- 40 DASe1
- Comparator
- bio-pesticidese1
- Setting
- Fieldt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Field evaluation of bio-agents against Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in maize.”
e1“Among bio-pesticides, bio-agent and neem based insecticides neemarin @ 3.0 lit/ha performed best with infestation of 17.1% (20 DAS) and 18.9% (40 DAS), leaf injury rating 3.1 (20 DAS) and 3.3 (40 DAS), number of dead hearts 5.1 (20 DAS) and 5.9 (40 DAS) and 16.9% of dead hearts (40 DAS)”
Claim · model-written summary
Neemarin at 3.0 lit/ha gave 5.1 dead hearts at 20 DAS in maize.
- Treatment
- neemarin @ 3.0 lit/hae1
- Interactor
- Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
- Outcome
- number of dead heartse1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 5.1e1
- Qualifier
- 20 DASe1
- Comparator
- bio-pesticidese1
- Setting
- Fieldt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Field evaluation of bio-agents against Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in maize.”
e1“Among bio-pesticides, bio-agent and neem based insecticides neemarin @ 3.0 lit/ha performed best with infestation of 17.1% (20 DAS) and 18.9% (40 DAS), leaf injury rating 3.1 (20 DAS) and 3.3 (40 DAS), number of dead hearts 5.1 (20 DAS) and 5.9 (40 DAS) and 16.9% of dead hearts (40 DAS)”
Claim · model-written summary
Neemarin at 3.0 lit/ha gave 5.9 dead hearts at 40 DAS in maize.
- Treatment
- neemarin @ 3.0 lit/hae1
- Interactor
- Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
- Outcome
- number of dead heartse1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 5.9e1
- Qualifier
- 40 DASe1
- Comparator
- bio-pesticidese1
- Setting
- Fieldt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Field evaluation of bio-agents against Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in maize.”
e1“Among bio-pesticides, bio-agent and neem based insecticides neemarin @ 3.0 lit/ha performed best with infestation of 17.1% (20 DAS) and 18.9% (40 DAS), leaf injury rating 3.1 (20 DAS) and 3.3 (40 DAS), number of dead hearts 5.1 (20 DAS) and 5.9 (40 DAS) and 16.9% of dead hearts (40 DAS)”
Claim · model-written summary
Neemarin at 3.0 lit/ha gave 16.9% dead hearts at 40 DAS in maize.
- Treatment
- neemarin @ 3.0 lit/hae1
- Interactor
- Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
- Outcome
- dead heartse1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede1
- Value
- 16.9%e1
- Qualifier
- 40 DASe1
- Comparator
- bio-pesticidese1
- Setting
- Fieldt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Field evaluation of bio-agents against Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in maize.”
e1“Among bio-pesticides, bio-agent and neem based insecticides neemarin @ 3.0 lit/ha performed best with infestation of 17.1% (20 DAS) and 18.9% (40 DAS), leaf injury rating 3.1 (20 DAS) and 3.3 (40 DAS), number of dead hearts 5.1 (20 DAS) and 5.9 (40 DAS) and 16.9% of dead hearts (40 DAS)”
Claim · model-written summary
Neemarin at 3.0 lit/ha gave grain yield of 30.32 q/ha in maize.
- Treatment
- neemarin @ 3.0 lit/hae1
- Interactor
- Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
- Outcome
- grain yielde2
- Direction
- higherinferrede2
- Value
- 30.32 q/hae2
- Comparator
- bio-pesticidese1
- Setting
- Fieldt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Field evaluation of bio-agents against Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in maize.”
e1“Among bio-pesticides, bio-agent and neem based insecticides neemarin @ 3.0 lit/ha performed best with infestation of 17.1% (20 DAS) and 18.9% (40 DAS), leaf injury rating 3.1 (20 DAS) and 3.3 (40 DAS), number of dead hearts 5.1 (20 DAS) and 5.9 (40 DAS) and 16.9% of dead hearts (40 DAS)”
e2“This treatment gave grain yield (30.32 q/ha), net returns (Rs.7935.00/ha) and cost benefit ratio (6.1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Neemarin at 3.0 lit/ha gave net returns of Rs.7935.00/ha in maize.
- Treatment
- neemarin @ 3.0 lit/hae1
- Interactor
- Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
- Outcome
- net returnse2
- Direction
- higherinferrede2
- Value
- Rs.7935.00/hae2
- Comparator
- bio-pesticidese1
- Setting
- Fieldt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Field evaluation of bio-agents against Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in maize.”
e1“Among bio-pesticides, bio-agent and neem based insecticides neemarin @ 3.0 lit/ha performed best with infestation of 17.1% (20 DAS) and 18.9% (40 DAS), leaf injury rating 3.1 (20 DAS) and 3.3 (40 DAS), number of dead hearts 5.1 (20 DAS) and 5.9 (40 DAS) and 16.9% of dead hearts (40 DAS)”
e2“This treatment gave grain yield (30.32 q/ha), net returns (Rs.7935.00/ha) and cost benefit ratio (6.1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Neemarin at 3.0 lit/ha gave cost benefit ratio 6.1 in maize.
- Treatment
- neemarin @ 3.0 lit/hae1
- Interactor
- Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
- Outcome
- cost benefit ratioe2
- Direction
- higherinferrede2
- Value
- 6.1e2
- Comparator
- bio-pesticidese1
- Setting
- Fieldt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Field evaluation of bio-agents against Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in maize.”
e1“Among bio-pesticides, bio-agent and neem based insecticides neemarin @ 3.0 lit/ha performed best with infestation of 17.1% (20 DAS) and 18.9% (40 DAS), leaf injury rating 3.1 (20 DAS) and 3.3 (40 DAS), number of dead hearts 5.1 (20 DAS) and 5.9 (40 DAS) and 16.9% of dead hearts (40 DAS)”
e2“This treatment gave grain yield (30.32 q/ha), net returns (Rs.7935.00/ha) and cost benefit ratio (6.1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid at 150 ml/ha had 15.3% Chilo partellus infestation at 20 DAS, the minimum among treatments, in maize.
- Treatment
- imidacloprid (17.8% SL @ 150 ml/ha)e1
- Interactor
- Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
- Outcome
- infestatione1
- Direction
- minimume1
- Value
- 15.3%e1
- Qualifier
- 20 DASe1
- Comparator
- all the treatmentse1
- Setting
- Fieldt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Field evaluation of bio-agents against Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in maize.”
e1“However, imidacloprid (17.8% SL @ 150 ml/ha) was found best among all the treatments with minimum infestation of 15.3% (20 DAS) and 16.5% (40 DAS), minimum leaf injury rating 2.1 (20 DAS) and 2.4 (40 DAS), minimum number of dead hearts 2.0 (20 DAS) and 2.6 (40 DAS) and minimum 7.4% of dead hearts (40 DAS)”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid at 150 ml/ha had 16.5% Chilo partellus infestation at 40 DAS, the minimum among treatments, in maize.
- Treatment
- imidacloprid (17.8% SL @ 150 ml/ha)e1
- Interactor
- Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
- Outcome
- infestatione1
- Direction
- minimume1
- Value
- 16.5%e1
- Qualifier
- 40 DASe1
- Comparator
- all the treatmentse1
- Setting
- Fieldt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Field evaluation of bio-agents against Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in maize.”
e1“However, imidacloprid (17.8% SL @ 150 ml/ha) was found best among all the treatments with minimum infestation of 15.3% (20 DAS) and 16.5% (40 DAS), minimum leaf injury rating 2.1 (20 DAS) and 2.4 (40 DAS), minimum number of dead hearts 2.0 (20 DAS) and 2.6 (40 DAS) and minimum 7.4% of dead hearts (40 DAS)”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid at 150 ml/ha gave leaf injury rating 2.1 at 20 DAS, the minimum among treatments, in maize.
- Treatment
- imidacloprid (17.8% SL @ 150 ml/ha)e1
- Interactor
- Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
- Outcome
- leaf injury ratinge1
- Direction
- minimume1
- Value
- 2.1e1
- Qualifier
- 20 DASe1
- Comparator
- all the treatmentse1
- Setting
- Fieldt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Field evaluation of bio-agents against Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in maize.”
e1“However, imidacloprid (17.8% SL @ 150 ml/ha) was found best among all the treatments with minimum infestation of 15.3% (20 DAS) and 16.5% (40 DAS), minimum leaf injury rating 2.1 (20 DAS) and 2.4 (40 DAS), minimum number of dead hearts 2.0 (20 DAS) and 2.6 (40 DAS) and minimum 7.4% of dead hearts (40 DAS)”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid at 150 ml/ha gave leaf injury rating 2.4 at 40 DAS, the minimum among treatments, in maize.
- Treatment
- imidacloprid (17.8% SL @ 150 ml/ha)e1
- Interactor
- Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
- Outcome
- leaf injury ratinge1
- Direction
- minimume1
- Value
- 2.4e1
- Qualifier
- 40 DASe1
- Comparator
- all the treatmentse1
- Setting
- Fieldt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Field evaluation of bio-agents against Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in maize.”
e1“However, imidacloprid (17.8% SL @ 150 ml/ha) was found best among all the treatments with minimum infestation of 15.3% (20 DAS) and 16.5% (40 DAS), minimum leaf injury rating 2.1 (20 DAS) and 2.4 (40 DAS), minimum number of dead hearts 2.0 (20 DAS) and 2.6 (40 DAS) and minimum 7.4% of dead hearts (40 DAS)”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid at 150 ml/ha gave 2.0 dead hearts at 20 DAS, the minimum among treatments, in maize.
- Treatment
- imidacloprid (17.8% SL @ 150 ml/ha)e1
- Interactor
- Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
- Outcome
- number of dead heartse1
- Direction
- minimume1
- Value
- 2.0e1
- Qualifier
- 20 DASe1
- Comparator
- all the treatmentse1
- Setting
- Fieldt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Field evaluation of bio-agents against Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in maize.”
e1“However, imidacloprid (17.8% SL @ 150 ml/ha) was found best among all the treatments with minimum infestation of 15.3% (20 DAS) and 16.5% (40 DAS), minimum leaf injury rating 2.1 (20 DAS) and 2.4 (40 DAS), minimum number of dead hearts 2.0 (20 DAS) and 2.6 (40 DAS) and minimum 7.4% of dead hearts (40 DAS)”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid at 150 ml/ha gave 2.6 dead hearts at 40 DAS, the minimum among treatments, in maize.
- Treatment
- imidacloprid (17.8% SL @ 150 ml/ha)e1
- Interactor
- Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
- Outcome
- number of dead heartse1
- Direction
- minimume1
- Value
- 2.6e1
- Qualifier
- 40 DASe1
- Comparator
- all the treatmentse1
- Setting
- Fieldt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Field evaluation of bio-agents against Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in maize.”
e1“However, imidacloprid (17.8% SL @ 150 ml/ha) was found best among all the treatments with minimum infestation of 15.3% (20 DAS) and 16.5% (40 DAS), minimum leaf injury rating 2.1 (20 DAS) and 2.4 (40 DAS), minimum number of dead hearts 2.0 (20 DAS) and 2.6 (40 DAS) and minimum 7.4% of dead hearts (40 DAS)”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid at 150 ml/ha gave 7.4% dead hearts at 40 DAS, the minimum among treatments, in maize.
- Treatment
- imidacloprid (17.8% SL @ 150 ml/ha)e1
- Interactor
- Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
- Outcome
- dead heartse1
- Direction
- minimume1
- Value
- 7.4%e1
- Qualifier
- 40 DASe1
- Comparator
- all the treatmentse1
- Setting
- Fieldt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Field evaluation of bio-agents against Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in maize.”
e1“However, imidacloprid (17.8% SL @ 150 ml/ha) was found best among all the treatments with minimum infestation of 15.3% (20 DAS) and 16.5% (40 DAS), minimum leaf injury rating 2.1 (20 DAS) and 2.4 (40 DAS), minimum number of dead hearts 2.0 (20 DAS) and 2.6 (40 DAS) and minimum 7.4% of dead hearts (40 DAS)”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid at 150 ml/ha gave the maximum grain yield of 36.29 q/ha in maize.
- Treatment
- imidacloprid (17.8% SL @ 150 ml/ha)e1
- Interactor
- Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
- Outcome
- grain yielde2
- Direction
- maximume2
- Value
- 36.29 q/hae2
- Comparator
- all the treatmentse2
- Setting
- Fieldt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Field evaluation of bio-agents against Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in maize.”
e1“However, imidacloprid (17.8% SL @ 150 ml/ha) was found best among all the treatments with minimum infestation of 15.3% (20 DAS) and 16.5% (40 DAS), minimum leaf injury rating 2.1 (20 DAS) and 2.4 (40 DAS), minimum number of dead hearts 2.0 (20 DAS) and 2.6 (40 DAS) and minimum 7.4% of dead hearts (40 DAS)”
e2“This treatment was also found best among all the treatments with maximum grain yield (36.29 q/ha), maximum net returns (Rs. 11185.00/ha) and highest cost benefit ratio (9.9)”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid at 150 ml/ha gave the maximum net returns of Rs. 11185.00/ha in maize.
- Treatment
- imidacloprid (17.8% SL @ 150 ml/ha)e1
- Interactor
- Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
- Outcome
- net returnse2
- Direction
- maximume2
- Value
- Rs. 11185.00/hae2
- Comparator
- all the treatmentse2
- Setting
- Fieldt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Field evaluation of bio-agents against Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in maize.”
e1“However, imidacloprid (17.8% SL @ 150 ml/ha) was found best among all the treatments with minimum infestation of 15.3% (20 DAS) and 16.5% (40 DAS), minimum leaf injury rating 2.1 (20 DAS) and 2.4 (40 DAS), minimum number of dead hearts 2.0 (20 DAS) and 2.6 (40 DAS) and minimum 7.4% of dead hearts (40 DAS)”
e2“This treatment was also found best among all the treatments with maximum grain yield (36.29 q/ha), maximum net returns (Rs. 11185.00/ha) and highest cost benefit ratio (9.9)”
Claim · model-written summary
Imidacloprid at 150 ml/ha gave the highest cost benefit ratio of 9.9 in maize.
- Treatment
- imidacloprid (17.8% SL @ 150 ml/ha)e1
- Interactor
- Chilo partellusChilo partellust0pest
- Outcome
- cost benefit ratioe2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 9.9e2
- Comparator
- all the treatmentse2
- Setting
- Fieldt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Field evaluation of bio-agents against Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in maize.”
e1“However, imidacloprid (17.8% SL @ 150 ml/ha) was found best among all the treatments with minimum infestation of 15.3% (20 DAS) and 16.5% (40 DAS), minimum leaf injury rating 2.1 (20 DAS) and 2.4 (40 DAS), minimum number of dead hearts 2.0 (20 DAS) and 2.6 (40 DAS) and minimum 7.4% of dead hearts (40 DAS)”
e2“This treatment was also found best among all the treatments with maximum grain yield (36.29 q/ha), maximum net returns (Rs. 11185.00/ha) and highest cost benefit ratio (9.9)”
The same questions in other papers
imidacloprid · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.