Paper · 2011 · Notulae Scientia Biologicae

Influence of Weed Competition on Potato Growth, Production and Radiation Use Efficiency

Farzad MONDANI; Farid GOLZARDI; Godarz AHMADVAND; et al.

7
claims
19
verbatim quotes
29
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Weed management in potato production is one of the main cost and time consuming practices. Understanding the most effective time of weed control could reduce the costs and increase potato yield. Field study was conducted in the west region of Iran during 2006 to evaluate the effect of weeds damage in potato fields. Twelve treatments used consisted of six initial weed-free periods in which plots were kept free of weeds for 0, 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 days after crop emergence (DAE), and then weeds were allowed to grow until harvest, and six initial weed-infested periods in which, weeds were allowed to grow for 0, 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 DAE, then the plots were kept free of weeds until harvest. Experiment was arranged as a randomized complete block design with three replications. The results showed effect of weed competition on crop dry matter started about 40 DAE and about 90 DAE reached its maximum. The weeds competition decreased dry matter accumulation, leaf area index, crop growth rate, leaf area index duration, light absorption, light extinction coefficient and radiation use efficiency (RUE) of potato. Weeds reduced the potato yield 54.8 percent. The beginning and the end of the critical period of weed control in potato (CPWC) was based on 5% and 10% tuber yield loss. The onset of the CPWC ranged from 486 to 572 GDD, at 5% and 10% yield loss level corresponding to 11 and 19 days after crop emergence, respectively. The end of the CPWC varied from 1372 to 1164 GDD, at 5% and 10% yield loss level corresponding to 65 and 51 days after crop emergence, respectively. RUE in the weed infestation treatment in comparison to the weed free treatment, reduced 11.8 percent.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed competition effects on potato dry matter began near 40 days after emergence and peaked near 90 days.

Interactor
weedse2weed
Outcome
effect of weed competition on crop dry mattere0
Qualifier
started about 40 DAE and about 90 DAE reached its maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of weed competition on crop dry matter started about 40 DAE and about 90 DAE reached its maximum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–907 · show in text ↑
e1

“potato fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–315 · show in text ↑
e2

“The weeds competition decreased dry matter accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed competition decreased potato dry matter accumulation, leaf area index and crop growth rate.

Treatment
weeds competitione0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
dry matter accumulation, leaf area index, crop growth ratee0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
weed free treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weeds competition decreased dry matter accumulation, leaf area index, crop growth rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–999 · show in text ↑
e1

“of potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1118 · show in text ↑
e2

“weed free treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1646–1665 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed competition decreased potato leaf area index duration, light absorption and light extinction coefficient.

Treatment
Weeds competitione0
Interactor
Weedse0weed
Outcome
leaf area index duration, light absorption, light extinction coefficiente0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
weed free treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weeds competition decreased dry matter accumulation, leaf area index, crop growth rate, leaf area index duration, light absorption, light extinction coefficient and radiation use efficiency (RUE) of potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 913–1118 · show in text ↑
e1

“weed free treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1646–1665 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weeds reduced potato yield by 54.8 percent.

Treatment
Weedse0
Interactor
Weedse0weed
Outcome
potato yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
54.8 percente0
Comparator
weed free treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weeds reduced the potato yield 54.8 percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1163 · show in text ↑
e1

“weed free treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1646–1665 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The critical weed control period began at 486 to 572 GDD, corresponding to 11 and 19 days after potato emergence for 5% and 10% yield loss.

Interactor
weedse2weed
Outcome
onset of the CPWCe0
Value
486 to 572 GDDe0
Qualifier
at 5% and 10% yield loss level corresponding to 11 and 19 days after crop emergencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The onset of the CPWC ranged from 486 to 572 GDD, at 5% and 10% yield loss level corresponding to 11 and 19 days after crop emergence, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1436 · show in text ↑
e1

“weed control in potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1239 · show in text ↑
e2

“The weeds competition decreased dry matter accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–964 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The critical weed control period ended at 1372 to 1164 GDD, corresponding to 65 and 51 days after potato emergence for 5% and 10% yield loss.

Interactor
weedse2weed
Outcome
end of the CPWCe0
Value
1372 to 1164 GDDe0
Qualifier
at 5% and 10% yield loss level corresponding to 65 and 51 days after crop emergencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The end of the CPWC varied from 1372 to 1164 GDD, at 5% and 10% yield loss level corresponding to 65 and 51 days after crop emergence, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1585 · show in text ↑
e1

“weed control in potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1217–1239 · show in text ↑
e2

“The weeds competition decreased dry matter accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed infestation reduced potato radiation use efficiency by 11.8 percent versus weed free treatment.

Treatment
weed infestation treatmente0
Interactor
weedse2weed
Outcome
RUEe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
11.8 percente0
Comparator
weed free treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RUE in the weed infestation treatment in comparison to the weed free treatment, reduced 11.8 percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1587–1687 · show in text ↑
e1

“of potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1118 · show in text ↑
e2

“The weeds competition decreased dry matter accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–964 · show in text ↑

competition · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

competition · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

infection · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 5 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.