Paper · 2012 · Legume Research - An International Journal

EFFECT OF ORGANICS ON YIELD, UPTAKE AND ECONOMICS OF GREEN GRAM (VIGNA RADIATA L.) PRODUCTION UNDER TERAI REGION OF WEST BENGAL

Partha Sarathi Patra; Ashim Chandra Sinha

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted in the experimental farm of Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Pundibari, Cooch Behar, West Bengal during 2009-2010 to study the effect of organics on yield, uptake and economics of green gram (Vigna radiata L.). The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with 12 treatments. Cultivar SML-668 was used in the trial. Results of the experiment revealed that average pod/picking, pod length, number of grains/pod, 100 pod weight and test weight was found to be highest under T4 (Neem cake @ 3.0 t ha-1) followed by T10 (NC @ 1.5 t ha-1+ PM @ 1.5 t ha-1) and T9 (VC @ 1.5 t ha-1+ NC @ 1.5 t ha-1). Based on pooled data treatment receiving neem cake @ 3.0 t ha-1 recorded highest grain yield of 847.50 kg ha-1 which was statistically at par with T9 (837.11 kg ha-1), however T11 (100 % RDF) fetched highest B:C ratio (2.58), might be due to lower treatment cost.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 gave the highest average pods per picking, followed by T10 and T9.

Treatment
T4 (Neem cake @ 3.0 t ha-1)e0
Outcome
average pod/pickinge0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
T10 (NC @ 1.5 t ha-1+ PM @ 1.5 t ha-1) and T9 (VC @ 1.5 t ha-1+ NC @ 1.5 t ha-1)e0

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“average pod/picking, pod length, number of grains/pod, 100 pod weight and test weight was found to be highest under T4 (Neem cake @ 3.0 t ha-1) followed by T10 (NC @ 1.5 t ha-1+ PM @ 1.5 t ha-1) and T9 (VC @ 1.5 t ha-1+ NC @ 1.5 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–637 · show in text ↑
t0

“GREEN GRAM (VIGNA RADIATA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 gave the highest pod length, followed by T10 and T9.

Treatment
T4 (Neem cake @ 3.0 t ha-1)e0
Outcome
pod lengthe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
T10 (NC @ 1.5 t ha-1+ PM @ 1.5 t ha-1) and T9 (VC @ 1.5 t ha-1+ NC @ 1.5 t ha-1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“average pod/picking, pod length, number of grains/pod, 100 pod weight and test weight was found to be highest under T4 (Neem cake @ 3.0 t ha-1) followed by T10 (NC @ 1.5 t ha-1+ PM @ 1.5 t ha-1) and T9 (VC @ 1.5 t ha-1+ NC @ 1.5 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–637 · show in text ↑
t0

“GREEN GRAM (VIGNA RADIATA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 gave the highest grains per pod, followed by T10 and T9.

Treatment
T4 (Neem cake @ 3.0 t ha-1)e0
Outcome
number of grains/pode0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
T10 (NC @ 1.5 t ha-1+ PM @ 1.5 t ha-1) and T9 (VC @ 1.5 t ha-1+ NC @ 1.5 t ha-1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“average pod/picking, pod length, number of grains/pod, 100 pod weight and test weight was found to be highest under T4 (Neem cake @ 3.0 t ha-1) followed by T10 (NC @ 1.5 t ha-1+ PM @ 1.5 t ha-1) and T9 (VC @ 1.5 t ha-1+ NC @ 1.5 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–637 · show in text ↑
t0

“GREEN GRAM (VIGNA RADIATA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 gave the highest 100 pod weight, followed by T10 and T9.

Treatment
T4 (Neem cake @ 3.0 t ha-1)e0
Outcome
100 pod weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
T10 (NC @ 1.5 t ha-1+ PM @ 1.5 t ha-1) and T9 (VC @ 1.5 t ha-1+ NC @ 1.5 t ha-1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“average pod/picking, pod length, number of grains/pod, 100 pod weight and test weight was found to be highest under T4 (Neem cake @ 3.0 t ha-1) followed by T10 (NC @ 1.5 t ha-1+ PM @ 1.5 t ha-1) and T9 (VC @ 1.5 t ha-1+ NC @ 1.5 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–637 · show in text ↑
t0

“GREEN GRAM (VIGNA RADIATA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 gave the highest test weight, followed by T10 and T9.

Treatment
T4 (Neem cake @ 3.0 t ha-1)e0
Outcome
test weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
T10 (NC @ 1.5 t ha-1+ PM @ 1.5 t ha-1) and T9 (VC @ 1.5 t ha-1+ NC @ 1.5 t ha-1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“average pod/picking, pod length, number of grains/pod, 100 pod weight and test weight was found to be highest under T4 (Neem cake @ 3.0 t ha-1) followed by T10 (NC @ 1.5 t ha-1+ PM @ 1.5 t ha-1) and T9 (VC @ 1.5 t ha-1+ NC @ 1.5 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–637 · show in text ↑
t0

“GREEN GRAM (VIGNA RADIATA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem cake at 3.0 t ha-1 gave the highest pooled grain yield, 847.50 kg ha-1, statistically at par with T9.

Treatment
neem cake @ 3.0 t ha-1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
847.50 kg ha-1e0
Qualifier
837.11 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
T9e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment receiving neem cake @ 3.0 t ha-1 recorded highest grain yield of 847.50 kg ha-1 which was statistically at par with T9 (837.11 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–805 · show in text ↑
t0

“GREEN GRAM (VIGNA RADIATA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T11 produced the highest benefit-cost ratio, 2.58.

Treatment
T11 (100 % RDF)e0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.58e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T11 (100 % RDF) fetched highest B:C ratio (2.58)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“GREEN GRAM (VIGNA RADIATA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–82 · show in text ↑

botanical · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 45 positive, 2 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

botanical · quality: grain · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.