Abstract
A field experiment was carried out during 2001-03 at Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi to study the impact of nutrient management practices on the growth, yield and economics of soybean ( Glycine max)-wheat ( Triticum aestivum) cropping system. The treatments consisted of combinations of 4 nutrient sources in main plots and 3 nutrient levels in subplots in soybean in rainy season. A general crop of wheat was grown during the follow- ing winter season to study the residual effect of treatments imposed on the previous soybean. The results indi- cated that application of 5 t/ha each of crop residues (CR) and farmyard manure (FYM) along with 5 kg zinc/ha among the nutrient sources and 100% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) among the nutrient levels recorded significantly higher growth and yield parameters and yield (1.62 t/ha) of soybean. The succeeding crop of wheat too showed a similar trend. The net returns were higher with 5 t/ha of FYM in soybean (Rs 8,154) and 5 t/ha each of CR and FYM alongwith 5 kg Zn/ha in succeeding wheat (Rs 12,577), as well as in soybean-wheat cropping system (Rs 20,334). The benefit:cost (B:C) ratio was higher with 100% RDF among nutrient levels (0.89) and with 5 t/ha CR (0.81 ) among the nutrient sources in soybean, whereas the 100% RDF among nutrient levels (0.73) and FYM @ 5 t/ha+ CR @ 5 t/ha + 5 kg Zn/ha among sources given to soybean recorded higher B:C ratio (0.72) in wheat. The organic carbon and the available N, P, K and Zn were higher with 5 t/ha each of CR and FYM along with 5 kg zinc/ha among the nutrient sources, and 100% RDF among nutrient levels after the completion of 3 years of experimentation. It was concluded that combined application of 5 t/ha each of CR and FYM along with 5 kg/ha zinc is necessary for getting higher yield and net returns from soybean-wheat cropping system.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Combined residues, manure and zinc with full fertilizer raised soybean growth and yield, reaching 1.62 t/ha.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- application of 5 t/ha each of crop residues (CR) and farmyard manure (FYM) along with 5 kg zinc/hae0
- Outcome
- growth and yield parameters and yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1.62 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“application of 5 t/ha each of crop residues (CR) and farmyard manure (FYM) along with 5 kg zinc/ha among the nutrient sources and 100% recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) among the nutrient levels recorded significantly higher growth and yield parameters and yield (1.62 t/ha) of soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
Succeeding wheat showed a similar response to nutrient management.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Outcome
- similar trende0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The succeeding crop of wheat too showed a similar trend.”
Claim · model-written summary
Nutrient management yielded Rs 8,154 net returns for soybean.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- 5 t/ha of FYMe0
- Outcome
- net returnse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- Rs 8,154e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The net returns were higher with 5 t/ha of FYM in soybean (Rs 8,154)”
Claim · model-written summary
Nutrient management yielded Rs 12,577 net returns for wheat.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- 5 t/ha each of CR and FYM alongwith 5 kg Zn/hae0
- Outcome
- net returnse1
- Value
- Rs 12,577e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“5 t/ha each of CR and FYM alongwith 5 kg Zn/ha in succeeding wheat (Rs 12,577)”
e1“The net returns were higher with 5 t/ha of FYM in soybean (Rs 8,154)”
Claim · model-written summary
Nutrient management yielded Rs 20,334 net returns for soybean-wheat.
Not reportedTreatmentDirection
Verbatim
e0“as well as in soybean-wheat cropping system (Rs 20,334)”
e1“The net returns were higher with 5 t/ha of FYM in soybean (Rs 8,154)”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean benefit:cost ratio was higher at full fertilizer, 0.89.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- 100% RDFe0
- Outcome
- benefit:cost (B:C) ratioe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 0.89e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The benefit:cost (B:C) ratio was higher with 100% RDF among nutrient levels (0.89) and with 5 t/ha CR (0.81 ) among the nutrient sources in soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean benefit:cost ratio was higher with crop residues, 0.81.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- 5 t/ha CRe0
- Outcome
- benefit:cost (B:C) ratioe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 0.81e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The benefit:cost (B:C) ratio was higher with 100% RDF among nutrient levels (0.89) and with 5 t/ha CR (0.81 ) among the nutrient sources in soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat benefit:cost ratio was higher with full fertilizer, 0.73.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the 100% RDF among nutrient levels (0.73) and FYM @ 5 t/ha+ CR @ 5 t/ha + 5 kg Zn/ha among sources given to soybean recorded higher B:C ratio (0.72) in wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat benefit:cost ratio was higher with combined manure, residues and zinc, 0.72.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- FYM @ 5 t/ha+ CR @ 5 t/ha + 5 kg Zn/hae0
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 0.72e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the 100% RDF among nutrient levels (0.73) and FYM @ 5 t/ha+ CR @ 5 t/ha + 5 kg Zn/ha among sources given to soybean recorded higher B:C ratio (0.72) in wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined manure, residues and zinc and full fertilizer raised soil organic carbon and available nutrients after three years.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- 5 t/ha each of CR and FYM along with 5 kg zinc/hae0
- Outcome
- organic carbon and the available N, P, K and Zne0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- after the completion of 3 years of experimentatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The organic carbon and the available N, P, K and Zn were higher with 5 t/ha each of CR and FYM along with 5 kg zinc/ha among the nutrient sources, and 100% RDF among nutrient levels after the completion of 3 years of experimentation.”
t0“soybean”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend combined residues, manure and zinc for higher yield and returns in the soybean–wheat system.
Verbatim
e0“combined application of 5 t/ha each of CR and FYM along with 5 kg/ha zinc is necessary for getting higher yield and net returns from soybean-wheat cropping system”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
85 papers more in this group
See all 89 papers →organic · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
72 papers more in this group
See all 76 papers →fertilization · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
1,020 papers in the same direction as this paper · 155 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
1,188 papers more in this group
See all 1,192 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.