Paper · 2013 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

The effect of integrated control methods of broadleaf weeds density on sugar beet yield in kermanshah zone

K. Bassiri; H. Najafi; M. J. Mirhadi; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

In order to study the impacts of mechanical (using cultivation), chemical (using herbicides) methods and their integration in controlling broadleaf weeds in sugar beet fields, this experiment was carried out as a randomized complete block design with 4 replications in Mahidasht-Kermanshah in 2006. In this experiment, 9 different treatments consisting a mixture of post-emergence herbicides phenmedipham + desmedipham + Ethofumesate and Triflusulfuron Methyl with Sittogate combined with cultivation and 2 check treatments with and without control of the weeds were investigated. The results indicated that cultivation treatment accompanied by Triflusulfuron Methyl reduced dry weight of weeds by 54.91% and showed 100% control of Amaranthus spp. In comparison with control treatment. Cultivation treatment combined with a mixture of phenmedipham+desmedipham+Ethofumesate and Triflusulfuron Methyl with Sittogate increased the sugar beet root dry weight by 159.89% and caused 100% control of the density of Conringia orientalis. Phenmedipham+desmedipham+Ethofumesate plus Triflusulfuron Methyl with sittogate treatment increased root yield by 121.86% compared to the check. In conclusion, the highest root yield was obtained in the cultivation treatment combined with phenmedipham + desmedipham+Ethofumesate, a mixture of phenmedipham + desmedipham + Ethofumesate and Triflusulfuron Methyl with Sittogate and cultivation treatments in sugar beet.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivation with Triflusulfuron Methyl reduced weed dry weight by 54.91% versus control.

Treatment
cultivation treatment accompanied by Triflusulfuron Methyle0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
dry weight of weedse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
54.91%e0
Comparator
control treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cultivation treatment accompanied by Triflusulfuron Methyl reduced dry weight of weeds by 54.91%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–704 · show in text ↑
e1

“In comparison with control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–784 · show in text ↑
e2

“sugar beet fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivation with Triflusulfuron Methyl achieved 100% control of Amaranthus spp. versus control.

Treatment
cultivation treatment accompanied by Triflusulfuron Methyle0
Interactor
Amaranthus spp.Amaranthuse0weed
Outcome
control of Amaranthus spp.e0
Direction
controle0
Value
100%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Amaranthus
Amaranthus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryClintacc · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cultivation treatment accompanied by Triflusulfuron Methyl reduced dry weight of weeds by 54.91% and showed 100% control of Amaranthus spp. In comparison with control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–784 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugar beet fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivation with the specified herbicide mixture increased sugar beet root dry weight by 159.89%.

Treatment
Cultivation treatment combined with a mixture of phenmedipham+desmedipham+Ethofumesate and Triflusulfuron Methyl with Sittogatee0
Outcome
root dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
159.89%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivation treatment combined with a mixture of phenmedipham+desmedipham+Ethofumesate and Triflusulfuron Methyl with Sittogate increased the sugar beet root dry weight by 159.89%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–965 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same cultivation and herbicide mixture produced 100% control of Conringia orientalis density.

Treatment
Cultivation treatment combined with a mixture of phenmedipham+desmedipham+Ethofumesate and Triflusulfuron Methyl with Sittogatee0
Interactor
Conringia orientalisConringia orientalise0weed
Outcome
density of Conringia orientalise0
Direction
controle0
Value
100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Conringia orientalis
Conringia orientalis · InteractorStefan.lefnaer · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivation treatment combined with a mixture of phenmedipham+desmedipham+Ethofumesate and Triflusulfuron Methyl with Sittogate increased the sugar beet root dry weight by 159.89% and caused 100% control of the density of Conringia orientalis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phenmedipham, desmedipham, Ethofumesate, Triflusulfuron Methyl and sittogate increased root yield by 121.86% versus the check.

Treatment
Phenmedipham+desmedipham+Ethofumesate plus Triflusulfuron Methyl with sittogate treatmente0
Outcome
root yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
121.86%e0
Comparator
the checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phenmedipham+desmedipham+Ethofumesate plus Triflusulfuron Methyl with sittogate treatment increased root yield by 121.86% compared to the check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1174 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugar beet root dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–954 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest sugar beet root yield occurred with cultivation plus herbicides and with cultivation alone.

Outcome
root yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
cultivation treatment combined with phenmedipham + desmedipham+Ethofumesate, a mixture of phenmedipham + desmedipham + Ethofumesate and Triflusulfuron Methyl with Sittogate and cultivation treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest root yield was obtained in the cultivation treatment combined with phenmedipham + desmedipham+Ethofumesate, a mixture of phenmedipham + desmedipham + Ethofumesate and Triflusulfuron Methyl with Sittogate and cultivation treatments in sugar beet.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1447 · show in text ↑

triflusulfuron-methyl · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

triflusulfuron-methyl · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

triflusulfuron-methyl · weed · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.