Abstract
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria can suppress diseases through antagonism between the bacteria and soilborne pathogens, as well as by inducing a systemic resistance in the plant against both root and foliar pathogens. Specific Pseudomonas strains induce systemic resistance in carnation, cucumber, radish, tobacco and Arabidopsis, as evidenced by an enhanced defensive capacity upon challenge inoculation. In carnation, radish and Arabidopsis, the O-antigeni c side chain of the bacterial outer membrane lipopolysaccharide acts as an inducing determinant, but other bacterial traits are also involved. Siderophores have been implicated in the induction of resistance in tobacco and Arabidopsis, and a novel type of siderophore, fluorebactin, may explain induction of resistance associated with salicylic acid (SA) in radish. Although SA induces phenotypically similar systemic acquired resistance, it is not necessary for the systemic resistance induced by most rhizobacterial strains, because this induced resistance is not associated with the accumulation of pathogenesis-related proteins and is fully expressed in Arabidopsis transformants unable to accumulate SA. Although some bacterial strains are equally effective in inducing resistance in different plant species, others show specificity, indicating specific recognition between bacteria and plants at the root surface.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 18
Claim · model-written summary
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria can suppress plant disease through antagonism with soilborne pathogens.
Verbatim
e0“Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria can suppress diseases through antagonism between the bacteria and soilborne pathogens, as well as by inducing a systemic resistance in the plant against both root and foliar pathogens.”
Claim · model-written summary
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria can suppress disease by inducing systemic resistance against root and foliar pathogens.
Verbatim
e0“Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria can suppress diseases through antagonism between the bacteria and soilborne pathogens, as well as by inducing a systemic resistance in the plant against both root and foliar pathogens.”
Claim · model-written summary
Pseudomonas strains induced systemic resistance in carnation, with enhanced defense after challenge inoculation.
- Taxon
- carnation
Dianthus caryophylluse0 - Treatment
- Pseudomonas strainse0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas strainse0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- systemic resistancee0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Specific Pseudomonas strains induce systemic resistance in carnation, cucumber, radish, tobacco and Arabidopsis, as evidenced by an enhanced defensive capacity upon challenge inoculation.”
Claim · model-written summary
Pseudomonas strains induced systemic resistance in cucumber, with enhanced defense after challenge inoculation.
- Taxon
- cucumber
Cucumis sativuse0 - Treatment
- Pseudomonas strainse0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas strainse0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- systemic resistancee0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Specific Pseudomonas strains induce systemic resistance in carnation, cucumber, radish, tobacco and Arabidopsis, as evidenced by an enhanced defensive capacity upon challenge inoculation.”
Claim · model-written summary
Pseudomonas strains induced systemic resistance in radish, with enhanced defense after challenge inoculation.
- Taxon
- radish
Raphanus sativuse0 - Treatment
- Pseudomonas strainse0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas strainse0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- systemic resistancee0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Specific Pseudomonas strains induce systemic resistance in carnation, cucumber, radish, tobacco and Arabidopsis, as evidenced by an enhanced defensive capacity upon challenge inoculation.”
Claim · model-written summary
Pseudomonas strains induced systemic resistance in tobacco, with enhanced defense after challenge inoculation.
- Taxon
- tobacco
Nicotiana tabacume0 - Treatment
- Pseudomonas strainse0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas strainse0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- systemic resistancee0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Specific Pseudomonas strains induce systemic resistance in carnation, cucumber, radish, tobacco and Arabidopsis, as evidenced by an enhanced defensive capacity upon challenge inoculation.”
Claim · model-written summary
Pseudomonas strains induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis, with enhanced defense after challenge inoculation.
- Taxon
- Arabidopsis
Arabidopsise0 - Treatment
- Pseudomonas strainse0
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas strainse0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- systemic resistancee0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Specific Pseudomonas strains induce systemic resistance in carnation, cucumber, radish, tobacco and Arabidopsis, as evidenced by an enhanced defensive capacity upon challenge inoculation.”
Claim · model-written summary
In carnation, the bacterial O-antigeni c side chain acts as a determinant of induced resistance.
- Taxon
- carnationDianthus caryophylluse0
- Compound
- bacterial outer membrane lipopolysaccharidee0
- Outcome
- inducing determinante0
- Qualifier
- O-antigeni c side chaine0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In carnation, radish and Arabidopsis, the O-antigeni c side chain of the bacterial outer membrane lipopolysaccharide acts as an inducing determinant, but other bacterial traits are also involved.”
Claim · model-written summary
In radish, the bacterial O-antigeni c side chain acts as a determinant of induced resistance.
- Taxon
- radishRaphanus sativuse0
- Compound
- bacterial outer membrane lipopolysaccharidee0
- Outcome
- inducing determinante0
- Qualifier
- O-antigeni c side chaine0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In carnation, radish and Arabidopsis, the O-antigeni c side chain of the bacterial outer membrane lipopolysaccharide acts as an inducing determinant, but other bacterial traits are also involved.”
Claim · model-written summary
In Arabidopsis, the bacterial O-antigeni c side chain acts as a determinant of induced resistance.
- Taxon
- ArabidopsisArabidopsise0
- Compound
- bacterial outer membrane lipopolysaccharidee0
- Outcome
- inducing determinante0
- Qualifier
- O-antigeni c side chaine0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In carnation, radish and Arabidopsis, the O-antigeni c side chain of the bacterial outer membrane lipopolysaccharide acts as an inducing determinant, but other bacterial traits are also involved.”
Claim · model-written summary
Siderophores are implicated in resistance induction in tobacco.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacume0
- Compound
- Siderophorese0
- Outcome
- induction of resistancee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Siderophores have been implicated in the induction of resistance in tobacco and Arabidopsis, and a novel type of siderophore, fluorebactin, may explain induction of resistance associated with salicylic acid (SA) in radish.”
Claim · model-written summary
Siderophores are implicated in resistance induction in Arabidopsis.
- Taxon
- ArabidopsisArabidopsise0
- Compound
- Siderophorese0
- Outcome
- induction of resistancee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Siderophores have been implicated in the induction of resistance in tobacco and Arabidopsis, and a novel type of siderophore, fluorebactin, may explain induction of resistance associated with salicylic acid (SA) in radish.”
Claim · model-written summary
Fluorebactin may explain salicylic-acid-associated resistance induction in radish.
- Taxon
- radishRaphanus sativuse0
- Compound
- fluorebactine0
- Outcome
- induction of resistancee0
- Qualifier
- associated with salicylic acid (SA)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Siderophores have been implicated in the induction of resistance in tobacco and Arabidopsis, and a novel type of siderophore, fluorebactin, may explain induction of resistance associated with salicylic acid (SA) in radish.”
Claim · model-written summary
SA is not required for resistance induced by most rhizobacterial strains.
- Taxon
- ArabidopsisArabidopsise0
- Compound
- SAe0
- Outcome
- systemic resistancee0
- Qualifier
- not necessarye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Although SA induces phenotypically similar systemic acquired resistance, it is not necessary for the systemic resistance induced by most rhizobacterial strains, because this induced resistance is not associated with the accumulation of pathogenesis-related proteins and is fully expressed in Arabidopsis transformants unable to accumulate SA.”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobacteria-induced resistance is not associated with accumulation of pathogenesis-related proteins.
- Taxon
- ArabidopsisArabidopsise0
- Interactor
- rhizobacterial strainse0symbiont
- Outcome
- accumulation of pathogenesis-related proteinse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Although SA induces phenotypically similar systemic acquired resistance, it is not necessary for the systemic resistance induced by most rhizobacterial strains, because this induced resistance is not associated with the accumulation of pathogenesis-related proteins and is fully expressed in Arabidopsis transformants unable to accumulate SA.”
Claim · model-written summary
Arabidopsis transformants unable to accumulate SA fully expressed rhizobacteria-induced resistance.
- Taxon
- ArabidopsisArabidopsise0
- Material
- Arabidopsis transformantse0
- Outcome
- induced resistancee0
- Direction
- fully expressede0
- Qualifier
- unable to accumulate SAe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Although SA induces phenotypically similar systemic acquired resistance, it is not necessary for the systemic resistance induced by most rhizobacterial strains, because this induced resistance is not associated with the accumulation of pathogenesis-related proteins and is fully expressed in Arabidopsis transformants unable to accumulate SA.”
Claim · model-written summary
Some bacterial strains are equally effective at inducing resistance in different plant species.
Verbatim
e0“Although some bacterial strains are equally effective in inducing resistance in different plant species, others show specificity, indicating specific recognition between bacteria and plants at the root surface.”
Claim · model-written summary
Other bacterial strains show plant-specific resistance induction, suggesting root-surface recognition.
- Taxon
- plantsViridiplantaee0
- Interactor
- bacterial strainse0symbiont
- Outcome
- specificitye0
- Qualifier
- specific recognition between bacteria and plants at the root surfacee0
Verbatim
e0“Although some bacterial strains are equally effective in inducing resistance in different plant species, others show specificity, indicating specific recognition between bacteria and plants at the root surface.”