Paper · 1991 · Crop Science

Modeling Light and Temperature Effects on Leaf Emergence in Wheat and Barley

Tyler Volk; Bruce Bugbee

6
claims
7
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Phenological development affects canopy structure, radiation interception, and dry matter production; most crop simulation models therefore incorporate leaf emergence rate as a basic parameter. A recent study examined leaf emergence rate as a function of temperature and daylength among wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars. Leaf emergence rate and phyllochron were modeled as functions of temperature alone, daylength alone, and the interaction between temperature and daylength. The resulting equations contained an unwieldy number of constants. Here we simplify by reducing the constants by > 70%, and show leaf emergence rate as a single response surface with temperature and daylength. In addition, we incorporate the effect of photosynthetic photon flux into the model. Generic fits for wheat and barley show cultivar differences less than +/- 5% for wheat and less than +/- 10% for barley. Barley is more sensitive to daylength changes than wheat for common environmental values of daylength, which may be related to the difference in sensitivity to daylength between spring and winter cultivars. Differences in leaf emergence rate between cultivars can be incorporated into the model by means of a single, nondimensional factor for each cultivar.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The simplified leaf emergence model reduced the number of constants by more than 70%.

Outcome
constantse0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
> 70%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Here we simplify by reducing the constants by > 70%, and show leaf emergence rate as a single response surface with temperature and daylength.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–724 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The model incorporates photosynthetic photon flux effects.

Outcome
effect of photosynthetic photon fluxe0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“In addition, we incorporate the effect of photosynthetic photon flux into the model.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–809 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Generic wheat fits show cultivar differences below +/- 5%.

Outcome
cultivar differencese0
Value
less than +/- 5%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Generic fits for wheat and barley show cultivar differences less than +/- 5% for wheat and less than +/- 10% for barley.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–930 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Generic barley fits show cultivar differences below +/- 10%.

Outcome
cultivar differencese0
Value
less than +/- 10%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Generic fits for wheat and barley show cultivar differences less than +/- 5% for wheat and less than +/- 10% for barley.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–930 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley is more sensitive to daylength changes than wheat at common daylength values.

Outcome
sensitive to daylength changese0
Direction
more sensitivee0
Qualifier
common environmental values of daylengthe0
Comparator
wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Barley is more sensitive to daylength changes than wheat for common environmental values of daylength”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1032 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A single nondimensional factor for each cultivar can incorporate cultivar differences in leaf emergence rate.

Outcome
Differences in leaf emergence rate between cultivarse0
Value
a single, nondimensional factore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Differences in leaf emergence rate between cultivars can be incorporated into the model by means of a single, nondimensional factor for each cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1288 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat and Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–76 · show in text ↑