Abstract
Mungbean or green gram (Vigna radiata L.) is an important component of rice-based cropping systems in Myanmar, where grain yields of around 800 kg ha -1 are much below its yield potential of 3000 kg ha -1 .The reasons for this shortfall are as under-investigated as is the genotype-specific response of this crop to phosphorus (P) application, which is critically low in many Myanmar soils, and the genetic variation in grain quality.For green gram quality, the concentration of lysine, an essential amino acid is particularly important given its scarcity in many cereal-based diets of Southeast Asia.The purpose of this study therefore was to investigate the effects of P application on the root and shoot growth, yield and its components for a range of green gram varieties, and to analyse the protein concentration and amino acid composition in green gram seed of different origins.To this end from 2001 to 2003, field experiments were conducted under rain-fed conditions in Yezin and Nyaung Oo.Fifteen landraces and five introduced green gram cultivars were grown at two levels of P (0 and 15 kg ha -1 ).There were large genotypic differences in P effects and a significant interaction between green gram genotypes and P for shoot and root growth.An unexpected benefit of P application was a reduction of pest and plant virus infestation in the field.Significant genotypic differences in the amino acid profile of seeds were also observed.The results indicate the potential for breeding efforts to increase seed yield and protein quality in green gram.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Genotypes differed in phosphorus effects on shoot and root growth.
- Taxon
- green gram
Vigna radiata var. radiatae0 - Material
- green gram genotypese0
- Treatment
- Pe0
- Outcome
- shoot and root growthe0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“There were large genotypic differences in P effects and a significant interaction between green gram genotypes and P for shoot and root growth”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus application reduced pest infestation.
- Taxon
- Green Gram
Vigna radiata var. radiatat0 - Treatment
- P applicatione0
- Outcome
- pest and plant virus infestatione0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Setting
- fielde0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“An unexpected benefit of P application was a reduction of pest and plant virus infestation in the field”
t0“Green Gram”
Claim · model-written summary
Phosphorus application reduced plant virus infestation.
- Taxon
- Green Gram
Vigna radiata var. radiatat0 - Treatment
- P applicatione0
- Interactor
- plant viruse0pathogen
- Outcome
- plant virus infestatione0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Setting
- fielde0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“An unexpected benefit of P application was a reduction of pest and plant virus infestation in the field”
t0“Green Gram”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed amino acid profiles differed significantly among genotypes.
- Taxon
- Green Gram
Vigna radiata var. radiatat0 - Material
- genotypice0
- Outcome
- amino acid profile of seedse0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Significant genotypic differences in the amino acid profile of seeds were also observed”
t0“Green Gram”
The same questions in other papers
phosphorus · pest · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.