Paper · 1971 · Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie

Vergleichende Studien über das Auftreten nadelfressender Kiefernraupen in Süddeutschland seit 18101

D. Klimetzek

14
claims
23
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Comparative studies on the occurrence of phytophageous pine caterpillars in South Germany since 1810. I. Areas of infestation in the Rheinpfalz . The occurrence of phytophageous pine caterpillars in two different regions of the Rheinpfalz since 1810 was examined by means of a thorough study of documents. The following species were taken into account: Bupalus piniarius L., Panolis flammea Schiff., Lymantria monacha L., Dendrolimus pint L. and Diprion pini L. In order to evaluate the frequency of outbreaks, an index rate was calculated for each year, using data on the excessive occurrence of the single species and the extent of economical damage. The results for the Rheinpfalz were compared with those of the forestry district Schwetzingen in the north of Baden. There were considerable differences between the individual species: In the Rheinpfalz, B. piniarius as well as L. monacha and P. flammea predominated. In the forestry district Schwetzingen however, these species were less frequent due to the more continentally influenced climate. Instead, Dendrolimus pini and Diprion pini , whose characteristics are the need of warmth and dryness, caused most of the outbreaks. In all three regions, a more frequent appearence of single species occurred during certain periods, the cause obviously being of a climatic nature. In spite of favourable conditions, the last period of observations (1931–1970) showed a distinct decline in the frequency of outbreaks. Zusammenfassung Mittels eingehender Aktenstudien wurde das Auftreten nadelfressender Kiefernraupen seit 1810 in zwei Schadgebieten der Rheinpfalz untersucht. Folgende Arten wurden berücksichtigt: Bupalus piniarius L., Panolis flammea Schiff., Lymantria monacha L., Dendrolimus pini L. und Diprion pini L. Zur Bewertung des Schädlingsauftretens wurde aus der Zahl der in Übervermehrung aufgetretenen Arten und dem Ausmaß des wirtschaftlichen Schadens für jedes Jahr ein Indexwert berechnet. Zum Vergleich wurde den rheinpfälzischen Befunden die Schädlingsgeschichte des nordbadischen Forstamtes Schwetzingen gegenübergestellt. Die Summe der Indexwerte für den gesamten Untersuchungszeitraum als Kennwert der Befallshäufigkeit beträgt 248 für Untersuchungsgebiet I, 67 für Untersuchungsgebiet II und 183 für das Forstamt Schwetzingen. Der Anteil der Arten am Gesamtbefall zeigt deutliche Unterschiede: In der Rheinpfalz überwiegen Kiefernspanner sowie Nonne und Forleule, im klimatisch stärker kontinental beeinflußten Forstamt Schwetzingen dagegen treten diese Arten zurück gegenüber Kiefernspinner und Buschhornblattwespe, für die besonders hohe Wärme‐ und Trockenheitsansprüche charakteristisch sind. In bestimmten Zeitabschnitten zeigen einzelne Arten in allen Gebieten verstärktes Auftreten, es handelt sich hierbei offenbar um die Wirkung klimatischer Einflüsse. Im letzten Beobachtungszeitraum 1931–1970 ist trotz günstiger klimatischer Bedingungen in der Rheinpfalz und im Forstamt Schwetzingen ein deutlicher Rückgang der Schädlingshäufigkeit zu verzeichnen. Ein Zusammenhang mit dem seit 1925 großflächig durchgeführten Laubholzunterbau und der Neubegründung von Mischbeständen wird vermutet; in einer Fortsetzung dieser Studie wird er näher untersucht.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. piniarius predominated in the Rheinpfalz.

Taxon
B. piniariusBupalus piniariae0
Outcome
predominatede0
Setting
Rheinpfalze0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bupalus piniaria
Bupalus piniaria · Taxonpicture taken by Olaf Leillinger · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the Rheinpfalz, B. piniarius as well as L. monacha and P. flammea predominated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–929 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L. monacha predominated in the Rheinpfalz.

Taxon
L. monachaLymantria monachae0
Outcome
predominatede0
Setting
Rheinpfalze0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lymantria monacha
Lymantria monacha · TaxonPlease report references to kulac gmx.at . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the Rheinpfalz, B. piniarius as well as L. monacha and P. flammea predominated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–929 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. flammea predominated in the Rheinpfalz.

Taxon
P. flammeaPanolis flammeae0
Outcome
predominatede0
Setting
Rheinpfalze0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Panolis flammea
Panolis flammea · TaxonOlei · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the Rheinpfalz, B. piniarius as well as L. monacha and P. flammea predominated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–929 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. piniarius was less frequent in Schwetzingen, attributed to its more continental climate.

Taxon
B. piniariusBupalus piniariae0
Outcome
less frequente0
Direction
less frequente0
Qualifier
more continentally influenced climatee0
Setting
Schwetzingene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bupalus piniaria
Bupalus piniaria · Taxonpicture taken by Olaf Leillinger · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the Rheinpfalz, B. piniarius as well as L. monacha and P. flammea predominated. In the forestry district Schwetzingen however, these species were less frequent due to the more continentally influenced climate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–1059 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L. monacha was less frequent in Schwetzingen, attributed to its more continental climate.

Taxon
L. monachaLymantria monachae0
Outcome
less frequente0
Direction
less frequente0
Qualifier
more continentally influenced climatee0
Setting
Schwetzingene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lymantria monacha
Lymantria monacha · TaxonPlease report references to kulac gmx.at . · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the Rheinpfalz, B. piniarius as well as L. monacha and P. flammea predominated. In the forestry district Schwetzingen however, these species were less frequent due to the more continentally influenced climate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–1059 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. flammea was less frequent in Schwetzingen, attributed to its more continental climate.

Taxon
P. flammeaPanolis flammeae0
Outcome
less frequente0
Direction
less frequente0
Qualifier
more continentally influenced climatee0
Setting
Schwetzingene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Panolis flammea
Panolis flammea · TaxonOlei · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the Rheinpfalz, B. piniarius as well as L. monacha and P. flammea predominated. In the forestry district Schwetzingen however, these species were less frequent due to the more continentally influenced climate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–1059 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dendrolimus pini caused most outbreaks in Schwetzingen together with Diprion pini.

Taxon
Dendrolimus piniDendrolimus pinie0
Outcome
outbreakse0
Direction
moste0
Setting
Schwetzingene1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dendrolimus pini
Dendrolimus pini · TaxonKulac · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Instead, Dendrolimus pini and Diprion pini , whose characteristics are the need of warmth and dryness, caused most of the outbreaks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1192 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the forestry district Schwetzingen however”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–975 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diprion pini caused most outbreaks in Schwetzingen together with Dendrolimus pini.

Taxon
Diprion piniDiprion pinie0
Outcome
outbreakse0
Direction
moste0
Setting
Schwetzingene1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diprion pini
Diprion pini · TaxonSorneguer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Instead, Dendrolimus pini and Diprion pini , whose characteristics are the need of warmth and dryness, caused most of the outbreaks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1192 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the forestry district Schwetzingen however”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–975 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Periodic increases in individual species across all three regions were attributed to climatic causes.

Taxon
pinePinuse1
Outcome
appearence of single speciese0
Direction
more frequente0
Qualifier
climatic naturee0
Setting
all three regionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus
Pinus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest Service Northern Region from Missoula, MT, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In all three regions, a more frequent appearence of single species occurred during certain periods, the cause obviously being of a climatic nature.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1340 · show in text ↑
e1

“phytophageous pine caterpillars in South Germany since 1810”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Outbreak frequency declined distinctly during 1931–1970 despite favourable conditions.

Taxon
pinePinuse1
Outcome
frequency of outbreakse0
Direction
declinee0
Qualifier
1931–1970e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus
Pinus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest Service Northern Region from Missoula, MT, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In spite of favourable conditions, the last period of observations (1931–1970) showed a distinct decline in the frequency of outbreaks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1476 · show in text ↑
e1

“phytophageous pine caterpillars in South Germany since 1810”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The summed infestation index was 248 in study area I.

Taxon
pinePinuse1
Outcome
Summe der Indexwertee0
Value
248e0
Setting
Untersuchungsgebiet Ie0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus
Pinus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest Service Northern Region from Missoula, MT, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Die Summe der Indexwerte für den gesamten Untersuchungszeitraum als Kennwert der Befallshäufigkeit beträgt 248 für Untersuchungsgebiet I, 67 für Untersuchungsgebiet II und 183 für das Forstamt Schwetzingen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2103–2309 · show in text ↑
e1

“phytophageous pine caterpillars in South Germany since 1810”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The summed infestation index was 67 in study area II.

Taxon
pinePinuse1
Outcome
Summe der Indexwertee0
Value
67e0
Setting
Untersuchungsgebiet IIe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus
Pinus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest Service Northern Region from Missoula, MT, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Die Summe der Indexwerte für den gesamten Untersuchungszeitraum als Kennwert der Befallshäufigkeit beträgt 248 für Untersuchungsgebiet I, 67 für Untersuchungsgebiet II und 183 für das Forstamt Schwetzingen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2103–2309 · show in text ↑
e1

“phytophageous pine caterpillars in South Germany since 1810”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The summed infestation index was 183 in Schwetzingen.

Taxon
pinePinuse1
Outcome
Summe der Indexwertee0
Value
183e0
Setting
Forstamt Schwetzingene0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus
Pinus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest Service Northern Region from Missoula, MT, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Die Summe der Indexwerte für den gesamten Untersuchungszeitraum als Kennwert der Befallshäufigkeit beträgt 248 für Untersuchungsgebiet I, 67 für Untersuchungsgebiet II und 183 für das Forstamt Schwetzingen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2103–2309 · show in text ↑
e1

“phytophageous pine caterpillars in South Germany since 1810”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–109 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The outbreak decline was hypothesized to be associated with broadleaf underplanting and new mixed stands since 1925.

Taxon
pinePinuse2
Outcome
Rückgang der Schädlingshäufigkeite1
Qualifier
seit 1925 großflächig durchgeführten Laubholzunterbau und der Neubegründung von Mischbeständene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus
Pinus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest Service Northern Region from Missoula, MT, USA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ein Zusammenhang mit dem seit 1925 großflächig durchgeführten Laubholzunterbau und der Neubegründung von Mischbeständen wird vermutet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3043–3176 · show in text ↑
e1

“ein deutlicher Rückgang der Schädlingshäufigkeit zu verzeichnen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2978–3041 · show in text ↑
e2

“phytophageous pine caterpillars in South Germany since 1810”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 50–109 · show in text ↑