Paper · 1976 · Open Access Repository of ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics)

Some biological aspects of intercropping systems on crop-weed balance.

M. R. Rao; S. V. R. Shetty

16
claims
20
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Many physical, biological and cultural management factors determine the crop-weed balance which in turn influences the crop and weed reproductive yields. Inter-cropping of pigeonpea (Cajanus cyan L. Millsp.) with sorghum (Sorghum vulgare Pers.) reduced weed growth to an extent of 50 to 75%. The competitive ability of intercropping was enhanced by high plant population pressure provided by the component species together. Within an intercrop system row arrangement patterns did not significantly influence the weed infestation. With the increase in the population pressure there was considerable decrease in weed dry matter weight. Weed growth in compact pigeonpea genotype (HY3A) was 37% higher than that observed in spreading type (ST1). Pearlmillct (Pennisetum typhoides S. and H.) and maize (Lea mays L.) showed high initial weed smother-ing ability followed by cowpea (Vigna sinensis Savi.) and groundnut (Archis hypogaea L.). Sorghum progressively increased its competitive ability with time. Hardy and tall weeds like Celosia argentea h., Acanthospermum hispidum DC, and Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. were predominant in groundnut system. Pigeonpea and castor (Ricinus communis L.) were poor competitors with weeds, A quantitative description of the effects of some biological factors like crop species, crop variety, plant population, crop geometry, relative proportions of the crops in the mixture and cropping pattern on the crop-weed balance indicated that these factors should be taken into account while evolving integrated weed management systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea-sorghum intercropping reduced weed growth by 50 to 75%.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Treatment
Inter-cropping of pigeonpea (Cajanus cyan L. Millsp.) with sorghum (Sorghum vulgare Pers.)e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
50 to 75%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inter-cropping of pigeonpea (Cajanus cyan L. Millsp.) with sorghum (Sorghum vulgare Pers.) reduced weed growth to an extent of 50 to 75%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–291 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High combined plant population enhanced intercropping competitive ability.

Taxon
cropt0
Treatment
high plant population pressuree0
Outcome
competitive ability of intercroppinge0
Direction
enhancede0

Verbatim

e0

“The competitive ability of intercropping was enhanced by high plant population pressure provided by the component species together.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–423 · show in text ↑
t0

“crop-weed balance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Row arrangement did not significantly influence weed infestation.

Taxon
cropt0
Treatment
row arrangement patternse0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed infestatione0
Direction
did not significantly influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Within an intercrop system row arrangement patterns did not significantly influence the weed infestation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–529 · show in text ↑
t0

“crop-weed balance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–69 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing plant population pressure decreased weed dry matter weight.

Taxon
cropt0
Treatment
population pressuree0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed dry matter weighte0
Direction
decreasee0

Verbatim

e0

“With the increase in the population pressure there was considerable decrease in weed dry matter weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–633 · show in text ↑
t0

“crop-weed balance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–69 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed growth was 37% higher in compact pigeonpea HY3A than spreading ST1.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Material
HY3Ae0
Interactor
Weede0weed
Outcome
Weed growthe0
Direction
highere0
Value
37%e0
Comparator
ST1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed growth in compact pigeonpea genotype (HY3A) was 37% higher than that observed in spreading type (ST1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–741 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pearlmillet showed high initial weed smothering ability.

Taxon
Pearlmillcte0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed smother-ing abilitye0
Direction
highe0

Verbatim

e0

“Pearlmillct (Pennisetum typhoides S. and H.) and maize (Lea mays L.) showed high initial weed smother-ing ability followed by cowpea (Vigna sinensis Savi.) and groundnut (Archis hypogaea L.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–933 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize showed high initial weed smothering ability.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed smother-ing abilitye0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pearlmillct (Pennisetum typhoides S. and H.) and maize (Lea mays L.) showed high initial weed smother-ing ability followed by cowpea (Vigna sinensis Savi.) and groundnut (Archis hypogaea L.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–933 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea ranked after pearlmillet and maize for initial weed smothering.

Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed smother-ing abilitye0
Direction
followed bye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pearlmillct (Pennisetum typhoides S. and H.) and maize (Lea mays L.) showed high initial weed smother-ing ability followed by cowpea (Vigna sinensis Savi.) and groundnut (Archis hypogaea L.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–933 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Groundnut ranked after pearlmillet and maize for initial weed smothering.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed smother-ing abilitye0
Direction
followed bye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pearlmillct (Pennisetum typhoides S. and H.) and maize (Lea mays L.) showed high initial weed smother-ing ability followed by cowpea (Vigna sinensis Savi.) and groundnut (Archis hypogaea L.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–933 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum competitive ability increased over time.

Taxon
SorghumSorghume0
Outcome
competitive abilitye0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
with timee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum progressively increased its competitive ability with time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1000 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Celosia argentea was predominant in the groundnut system.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Interactor
Celosia argentea h.Celosia argenteae0weed
Outcome
predominante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Celosia argentea
Celosia argentea · InteractorJ.M.Garg · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hardy and tall weeds like Celosia argentea h., Acanthospermum hispidum DC, and Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. were predominant in groundnut system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1150 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acanthospermum hispidum was predominant in the groundnut system.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Interactor
Acanthospermum hispidum DCAcanthospermum hispidume0weed
Outcome
predominante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Acanthospermum hispidum
Acanthospermum hispidum · InteractorTon Rulkens from Mozambique · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hardy and tall weeds like Celosia argentea h., Acanthospermum hispidum DC, and Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. were predominant in groundnut system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1150 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Digitaria sanguinalis was predominant in the groundnut system.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Interactor
Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.Digitaria sanguinalise0weed
Outcome
predominante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Digitaria sanguinalis
Digitaria sanguinalis · InteractorMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hardy and tall weeds like Celosia argentea h., Acanthospermum hispidum DC, and Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. were predominant in groundnut system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1150 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeonpea competed poorly with weeds.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
poor competitorse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pigeonpea and castor (Ricinus communis L.) were poor competitors with weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1226 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Castor competed poorly with weeds.

Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
poor competitorse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pigeonpea and castor (Ricinus communis L.) were poor competitors with weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1226 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend considering biological cropping factors in integrated weed management.

Taxon
cropt0
Outcome
these factors should be taken into account while evolving integrated weed management systemse0

Verbatim

e0

“these factors should be taken into account while evolving integrated weed management systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1473–1566 · show in text ↑
t0

“crop-weed balance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–69 · show in text ↑

intercropping · weed · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.