Paper · 2000 · Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture)

Crop production during the first course of an organic crop rotation trial in Denmark

Jørgen E. Olesen; Margrethe Askegaard; Ilse Ankær Rasmussen

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Three factors are included in a factorial field experiment: 1) fraction of grass-clover and pulses in the rotation (crop rotation), 2) catch crop (with or without catch crop), and 3) manure (with or without animal manure). Manure is applied as slurry in rates corresponding to 40 % of the nitrogen demand. Grain yields for three sites and three years of the experiment are presented for two four-course rotations. One rotation has a green-manure crop, which is replaced by winter wheat in the other rotation. The use of manure significantly increased grain yield of the cereal crops in most cases. The positive effects of the catch crops were mainly observed in the spring cereals. The largest rotation yields were obtained in the crop rotation without a green manure crop. The positive effect of a green manure crop could not substitute for the yield decrease from leaving 25% of the area out of produc-tion

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manure significantly increased grain yield of the cereal crops in most cases.

Taxon
cereal cropse1
Treatment
manuree1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The use of manure significantly increased grain yield of the cereal crops in most cases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–596 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The positive effects of catch crops were mainly observed in spring cereals.

Taxon
spring cerealse1
Treatment
catch cropse1
Outcome
positive effectse1
Direction
positivee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The positive effects of the catch crops were mainly observed in the spring cereals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–680 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The largest rotation yields were obtained in the crop rotation without a green manure crop.

Treatment
crop rotation without a green manure crope1
Outcome
rotation yieldse1
Direction
largeste1

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The largest rotation yields were obtained in the crop rotation without a green manure crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The positive effect of a green manure crop could not substitute for the yield decrease from leaving 25% of the area out of production.

Treatment
green manure crope1
Outcome
yield decreasee1
Direction
could not substitutee1

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The positive effect of a green manure crop could not substitute for the yield decrease from leaving 25% of the area out of produc-tion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–908 · show in text ↑