Paper · 2009 · Zhíwù bìnglǐxué huìkān

Formulation of essential oils and yeast for controlling postharvest decay of tomato fruits.

Abdalla Abdalla; Nehal; S. A. El-Mougy; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Candida tenuis and the commercial backing yeast of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mixture (CBY) and/or peppermint, melon and rose essential oi1s were evaluated for their in vitro activity against the fungal growth of Botrytis cinerea, Rhizopus stolonifer and Alternaria alternate the causal agents of tomato fruit decay. S. cerevisiae mixture (CBY) proved it self to have the highest inhibitory effect on the growth of the pathogenic tested fungi fol1owed by the two other yeast isolates S. cerevisiae and C. tennis. All the tested concentrations of peppermint oil had not negative effect against the viability of tested yeasts, while significant reduction in the populations of all yeast isolates was observed at melon and rose oils treatments even at the lowest concentration tested. Peppermint oil showed superior inhibitory effect against the growth of tested pathogenic fungifol1owed by rose and melon oils, respectively. Mixtures of peppermint oil with any of yeast isolate showed high inhibitor effect against the pathogenic fungal growth compared with rose and melon oils mixtures. Under storage conditions, application of carnauba wax formula containing either S. cerevisiae or S. cerevisiae (CBY) combined with peppermint oil (1%) had more superior effect for reducing gray mould, soft rot and black rot incidence as well as disease development of tomato fruit,reaching up to 100% under artificial inoculation of decay pathogenic fungi. On the light of the obtained results in the present study, it could be concluded that the application of carnauba wax containing 1% peppermint oi1 combined with S. cerevisiae or S. cerevisiae (CBY), could control several post-harvest diseases of tomato fruit without affecting tomato fruit quality under storage conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Commercial baking yeast had the highest in vitro inhibition of the tested fungi.

Taxon
tomato fruitsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
S. cerevisiae mixture (CBY)e0
Interactor
pathogenic tested fungie0pathogen
Second interactor
S. cerevisiae mixture (CBY)Saccharomyces cerevisiaee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth of the pathogenic tested fungie0
Direction
highest inhibitory effecte0
Comparator
two other yeast isolates S. cerevisiae and C. tennise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Saccharomyces cerevisiae · Second interactorMasur · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“S. cerevisiae mixture (CBY) proved it self to have the highest inhibitory effect on the growth of the pathogenic tested fungi fol1owed by the two other yeast isolates S. cerevisiae and C. tennis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–547 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peppermint oil concentrations did not reduce tested yeast viability.

Taxon
tomato fruitsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
peppermint oile0
Interactor
tested yeastse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
viability of tested yeastse0
Direction
not negative effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“All the tested concentrations of peppermint oil had not negative effect against the viability of tested yeasts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–658 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Melon oil significantly reduced yeast populations.

Taxon
tomato fruitsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
melone0
Interactor
yeast isolatese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
populations of all yeast isolatese0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“significant reduction in the populations of all yeast isolates was observed at melon and rose oils treatments even at the lowest concentration tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rose oil significantly reduced yeast populations.

Taxon
tomato fruitsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
rose oilse0
Interactor
yeast isolatese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
populations of all yeast isolatese0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“significant reduction in the populations of all yeast isolates was observed at melon and rose oils treatments even at the lowest concentration tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peppermint oil inhibited tested fungal growth more than rose and melon oils.

Taxon
tomato fruitsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
Peppermint oile0
Interactor
tested pathogenic fungie0pathogen
Outcome
growth of tested pathogenic fungie0
Direction
superior inhibitory effecte0
Comparator
rose and melon oilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“Peppermint oil showed superior inhibitory effect against the growth of tested pathogenic fungifol1owed by rose and melon oils, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–957 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peppermint oil and yeast mixtures inhibited fungal growth more than rose and melon oil mixtures.

Taxon
tomato fruitsSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment
Mixtures of peppermint oil with any of yeast isolatee0
Interactor
pathogenic fungale0pathogen
Second interactor
yeast isolatee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
pathogenic fungal growthe0
Direction
high inhibitor effecte0
Comparator
rose and melon oils mixturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“Mixtures of peppermint oil with any of yeast isolate showed high inhibitor effect against the pathogenic fungal growth compared with rose and melon oils mixtures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carnauba wax with S. cerevisiae and peppermint oil reduced tomato gray mould, soft rot and black rot incidence under storage.

Treatment
carnauba wax formula containing either S. cerevisiae or S. cerevisiae (CBY) combined with peppermint oil (1%)e0
Interactor
decay pathogenic fungie0pathogen
Second interactor
S. cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiaee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
gray mould, soft rot and black rot incidencee0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
up to 100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Saccharomyces cerevisiae · Second interactorMasur · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of carnauba wax formula containing either S. cerevisiae or S. cerevisiae (CBY) combined with peppermint oil (1%) had more superior effect for reducing gray mould, soft rot and black rot incidence as well as disease development of tomato fruit,reaching up to 100% under artificial inoculation of decay pathogenic fungi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1477 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same wax formulations reduced development of tomato fruit disease under storage.

Treatment
carnauba wax formula containing either S. cerevisiae or S. cerevisiae (CBY) combined with peppermint oil (1%)e0
Interactor
decay pathogenic fungie0pathogen
Second interactor
S. cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiaee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
disease development of tomato fruite0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Saccharomyces cerevisiae · Second interactorMasur · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of carnauba wax formula containing either S. cerevisiae or S. cerevisiae (CBY) combined with peppermint oil (1%) had more superior effect for reducing gray mould, soft rot and black rot incidence as well as disease development of tomato fruit,reaching up to 100% under artificial inoculation of decay pathogenic fungi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1147–1477 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that carnauba wax with peppermint oil and either yeast can control postharvest diseases without affecting fruit quality.

Taxon
tomato fruitSolanum lycopersicume0
Interactor
S. cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiaee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
control several post-harvest diseases of tomato fruit without affecting tomato fruit qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Saccharomyces cerevisiae · InteractorMasur · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of carnauba wax containing 1% peppermint oi1 combined with S. cerevisiae or S. cerevisiae (CBY), could control several post-harvest diseases of tomato fruit without affecting tomato fruit quality under storage conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1801 · show in text ↑

Mentha x piperita · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Mentha x piperita · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.