Paper · 2004 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Effect of Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl on Transplanted Rice and Associated Weeds

Vinay Singh; Govindra Singh; Mahendra Singh

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
30
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Echinochloa colona, Echinochloa crusgalli and Ischaemum rugosum were effectively controlled by fenoxaprop at 56.25 g ha−1. Application of fenoxaprop 10 days after transplanting was relatively better than application 20 days after transplanting in reducing weed density and weed dry matter production. Fenoxaprop at 56.25 g ha−1 applied 10 days after rice transplanting produced significantly more grain yield than application done at 20 days after transplanting.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenoxaprop effectively controlled Echinochloa colona.

Treatment
fenoxaprop at 56.25 g ha−1e0
Interactor
Echinochloa colonaEchinochloa colonae0weed
Outcome
effectively controllede0
Direction
effectively controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Echinochloa colona
Echinochloa colona · InteractorTauʻolunga · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Echinochloa colona, Echinochloa crusgalli and Ischaemum rugosum were effectively controlled by fenoxaprop at 56.25 g ha−1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenoxaprop effectively controlled Echinochloa crusgalli.

Treatment
fenoxaprop at 56.25 g ha−1e0
Interactor
Echinochloa crusgalliEchinochloa crus-gallie0weed
Outcome
effectively controllede0
Direction
effectively controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Echinochloa crus-galli
Echinochloa crus-galli · InteractorMichael Becker · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Echinochloa colona, Echinochloa crusgalli and Ischaemum rugosum were effectively controlled by fenoxaprop at 56.25 g ha−1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenoxaprop effectively controlled Ischaemum rugosum.

Treatment
fenoxaprop at 56.25 g ha−1e0
Interactor
Ischaemum rugosumIschaemum rugosume0weed
Outcome
effectively controllede0
Direction
effectively controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ischaemum rugosum
Ischaemum rugosum · Interactorprossington · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Echinochloa colona, Echinochloa crusgalli and Ischaemum rugosum were effectively controlled by fenoxaprop at 56.25 g ha−1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–122 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenoxaprop at 10 days after transplanting reduced weed density more than application at 20 days.

Treatment
Application of fenoxaprop 10 days after transplantinge0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
application 20 days after transplantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of fenoxaprop 10 days after transplanting was relatively better than application 20 days after transplanting in reducing weed density and weed dry matter production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–300 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenoxaprop at 10 days after transplanting reduced weed dry matter production more than application at 20 days.

Treatment
Application of fenoxaprop 10 days after transplantinge0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed dry matter productione0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
application 20 days after transplantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of fenoxaprop 10 days after transplanting was relatively better than application 20 days after transplanting in reducing weed density and weed dry matter production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–300 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenoxaprop at 10 days after transplanting gave significantly more rice grain yield than application at 20 days.

Treatment
Fenoxaprop at 56.25 g ha−1 applied 10 days after rice transplantinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
application done at 20 days after transplantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fenoxaprop at 56.25 g ha−1 applied 10 days after rice transplanting produced significantly more grain yield than application done at 20 days after transplanting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 301–462 · show in text ↑

transplanting · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

146 papers: 129 positive, 17 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

142 papers more in this group

See all 146 papers →

transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,078 papers: 922 positive, 156 negative or no effect

921 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,074 papers more in this group

See all 1,078 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.