Paper · 1979 · Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding (The)

Combining Ability Analysis for Yield and some Yield Components in Maize

I. S. Singh; V. L. Asnani

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Combining ability for yield and five yield components was studied in a set of eight parent diallel crosses including reciprocals, of maize. The inbred lines included in this study were ‘CM 101’, ‘CM 110’, ‘GT 112’, ‘CM 201’, ‘Eto’, ‘Cuba 24’, ‘DA-1’ and ‘KT 41’. Both GCA and SCA mean squares were found to be significant. ‘Eto’, ‘Cuba 24’ and ‘DA-1’ were observed to be good general combiners for grain yield. Good combiners for grain yield were also generally good combiners for 100-grain weight. Variation due to reciprocal differences was significant for grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eto, Cuba 24 and DA-1 were good general combiners for grain yield in maize.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Material
‘Eto’, ‘Cuba 24’ and ‘DA-1’e0
Outcome
good general combiners for grain yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“‘Eto’, ‘Cuba 24’ and ‘DA-1’ were observed to be good general combiners for grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–409 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Good combiners for grain yield were also generally good combiners for 100-grain weight in maize.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
100-grain weighte1
Qualifier
generally good combinerse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“Good combiners for grain yield were also generally good combiners for 100-grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–497 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GCA and SCA mean squares were significant for yield and yield components in maize.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
GCA and SCA mean squarese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
e2

“Both GCA and SCA mean squares were found to be significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–321 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reciprocal differences contributed a significant variation for grain yield in maize.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
Variation due to reciprocal differencese3
Qualifier
grain yielde3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
e3

“Variation due to reciprocal differences was significant for grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–570 · show in text ↑