Paper · 2012 · International Journal of Phytopathology

Influence of Cultural Practices on the Development of Gray Leaf Spot (GLS) on Maize at Bako, Western Ethiopia

Aschalew Sisay; Fekede Abebe; Kedir Wako

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The experiment was conducted at Bako Agricultural Research Center from 2008 to 2009 cropping seasons in order to evaluate the effect of sowing dates and ploughing frequency on the development of Grey Leaf Spot (GLS) on maize. The susceptible variety Phb 3253, with three sowing dates (early, optimum and late at 10 days interval) and three ploughing treatments: Minimum tillage (once), farmer’s practice (three times ploughing) and four times ploughing were used. All plots were uniformly treated with GLS infected crop residue before first ploughing. Trial was laid out in factorial arrangement in Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. Among the planting dates, the highest disease severity of 7.60, 7.44 & 7.00, (1-9 scale) and Area Under Disease Progress Curve (AUDPC) 305.83, 280.1 and 280.33 were recorded in early sown minimum (conservation) tillage practices, while the lowest was with AUDPC 161.50, 196.50 and 222.67 in four times ploughed plots in 2007, 2008 and 2009 years respectively. The highest thousand seed weight and grain yield was observed in four times ploughed and in early sown plots, while the lowest thousand seed weights and grain yield were recorded in the conservation tillage practice. Four times ploughed and early sown fields had a mean yield advantage of 474.73kg (6.66%) and a total yield advantage 2020.77kg (36.23.6%) over three times ploughed and minimum tillage practices for the three seasons 2008-2009. In general higher disease severity, low thousand seed weight and grain yield were recorded for the conservation tillage compared to other practices. The overall results showed that four times ploughing result in superior maize grain yield performance compared to others as it has resulted in reducing the disease development.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing with minimum tillage had the highest disease severity.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
early sown minimum (conservation) tillage practicese0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
7.60, 7.44 & 7.00, (1-9 scale)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest disease severity of 7.60, 7.44 & 7.00, (1-9 scale) and Area Under Disease Progress Curve (AUDPC) 305.83, 280.1 and 280.33 were recorded in early sown minimum (conservation) tillage practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–892 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing with minimum tillage had the highest AUDPC.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
early sown minimum (conservation) tillage practicese0
Outcome
Area Under Disease Progress Curve (AUDPC)e0
Value
305.83, 280.1 and 280.33e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Area Under Disease Progress Curve (AUDPC) 305.83, 280.1 and 280.33 were recorded in early sown minimum (conservation) tillage practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–892 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four ploughings had the lowest AUDPC across the three listed years.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
four times ploughed plotse0
Outcome
AUDPCe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
161.50, 196.50 and 222.67e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest was with AUDPC 161.50, 196.50 and 222.67 in four times ploughed plots in 2007, 2008 and 2009 years respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1022 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four ploughings and early sowing had the highest thousand-seed weight and grain yield.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
four times ploughed and in early sown plotse0
Outcome
thousand seed weight and grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest thousand seed weight and grain yield was observed in four times ploughed and in early sown plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1132 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation tillage had the lowest thousand-seed weight and grain yield.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
conservation tillage practicee0
Outcome
thousand seed weights and grain yielde0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest thousand seed weights and grain yield were recorded in the conservation tillage practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1239 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four ploughings and early sowing gave a mean yield advantage of 474.73kg (6.66%).

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Four times ploughed and early sown fieldse0
Outcome
mean yield advantagee0
Direction
advantagee0
Value
474.73kg (6.66%)e0
Comparator
three times ploughed and minimum tillage practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four times ploughed and early sown fields had a mean yield advantage of 474.73kg (6.66%) and a total yield advantage 2020.77kg (36.23.6%) over three times ploughed and minimum tillage practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1434 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four ploughings and early sowing gave a total yield advantage of 2020.77kg (36.23.6%).

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Four times ploughed and early sown fieldse0
Outcome
total yield advantagee0
Direction
advantagee0
Value
2020.77kg (36.23.6%)e0
Comparator
three times ploughed and minimum tillage practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four times ploughed and early sown fields had a mean yield advantage of 474.73kg (6.66%) and a total yield advantage 2020.77kg (36.23.6%) over three times ploughed and minimum tillage practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1434 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation tillage had higher disease severity than other practices.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
conservation tillagee0
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher disease severity, low thousand seed weight and grain yield were recorded for the conservation tillage compared to other practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1615 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four ploughings produced superior grain yield and reduced disease development.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
four times ploughinge0
Outcome
maize grain yield performancee0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
otherse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“four times ploughing result in superior maize grain yield performance compared to others as it has resulted in reducing the disease development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1649–1792 · show in text ↑

sowing time · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

269 papers: 178 positive, 91 negative or no effect

177 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

265 papers more in this group

See all 269 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.