Abstract
Our studywas performed totesttheeffectsofmycorrhizafungiand plantgrowthpromoting bacteriaonStrigacontrolinsorghum.AM funginegatively impactedonStrigagermination. It reducedthe number ofStrigaseedlings attaching and emerging,and delayedtheemergencetimeofStrigainpot experiment.The performance oftheAMF aloneorincombinations withbacterialstrainswas significantly betterthanthatofthebacteriaaloneintermsofreductionofStrigainfestation, plant heightanddrymatter. AM fungienhancedtheperformanceofthesorghumhost,allowingittowithstandStrigadamage better.The percentreduction(82%)ofStrigaemergenceafterAM inoculationresultedinabouta28% increaseintotal drymatter ofsorghumoverthecontrol.Theplantheightanddrymatter ofsorghum weresignificant lyhigher inthecombinationsbetween AM + bacteriastrains.Moreover,resultsof thisexperimentsuggestthat mycorrhizalmanagementmightbeanimportant factorinanintegratedmanagement withbacteriaforStriga control.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
AM fungi negatively affected Striga germination.
- Treatment
- AM fungie0
- Interactor
- AM fungiGlomeromycotae0other
- Outcome
- Strigagerminatione0
- Direction
- negatively impactede0
StrigaNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“AM funginegatively impactedonStrigagermination.”
Claim · model-written summary
AM fungi reduced attaching and emerging Striga seedlings.
- Treatment
- AM fungie1
- Outcome
- number ofStrigaseedlings attaching and emerginge0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Setting
- pot experimente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It reducedthe number ofStrigaseedlings attaching and emerging,and delayedtheemergencetimeofStrigainpot experiment.”
e1“AM funginegatively impactedonStrigagermination.”
Claim · model-written summary
AM fungi delayed Striga emergence in the pot experiment.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It reducedthe number ofStrigaseedlings attaching and emerging,and delayedtheemergencetimeofStrigainpot experiment.”
e1“AM funginegatively impactedonStrigagermination.”
Claim · model-written summary
AMF alone performed significantly better than bacteria alone in reducing Striga infestation and improving plant height and dry matter.
- Treatment
- AMF alonee0
- Second interactor
- AMFe0symbiont
- Outcome
- reductionofStrigainfestation, plant heightanddrymattere0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- bacteriaalonee0
SorghumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The performance oftheAMF aloneorincombinations withbacterialstrainswas significantly betterthanthatofthebacteriaaloneintermsofreductionofStrigainfestation, plant heightanddrymatter.”
t0“sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
AMF combined with bacterial strains performed significantly better than bacteria alone in reducing Striga infestation and improving plant height and dry matter.
- Treatment
- combinations withbacterialstrainse0
- Second interactor
- AMFe0symbiont
- Outcome
- reductionofStrigainfestation, plant heightanddrymattere0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- bacteriaalonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The performance oftheAMF aloneorincombinations withbacterialstrainswas significantly betterthanthatofthebacteriaaloneintermsofreductionofStrigainfestation, plant heightanddrymatter.”
t0“sorghum”
Claim · model-written summary
AM fungi enhanced sorghum host performance and its ability to withstand Striga damage.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“AM fungienhancedtheperformanceofthesorghumhost,allowingittowithstandStrigadamage better.”
Claim · model-written summary
AM inoculation reduced Striga emergence by 82%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The percentreduction(82%)ofStrigaemergenceafterAM inoculationresultedinabouta28% increaseintotal drymatter ofsorghumoverthecontrol.”
Claim · model-written summary
AM inoculation increased sorghum total dry matter by about 28% over the control.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The percentreduction(82%)ofStrigaemergenceafterAM inoculationresultedinabouta28% increaseintotal drymatter ofsorghumoverthecontrol.”
Claim · model-written summary
AM plus bacterial strains produced significantly higher sorghum height and dry matter.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Theplantheightanddrymatter ofsorghum weresignificant lyhigher inthecombinationsbetween AM + bacteriastrains.”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest mycorrhizal management may be important in integrated bacterial management for Striga control.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“mycorrhizalmanagementmightbeanimportant factorinanintegratedmanagement withbacteriaforStriga control.”
t0“sorghum”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · Striga · SorghumPositive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →mycorrhiza · Striga · SorghumResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.