Paper · 2019 · BIOTROPIA

ECOLOGICAL STUDY IN TWO QUARRIED LIMESTONE KARST HILLS IN BOGOR WEST JAVA: VEGETATION STRUCTURE AND FLORISTIC COMPOSITION

ANNISA SATYANTI; YAYAN WAHYU CANDRA KUSUMA

18
claims
26
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Many species extinctions have probably gone unnoticed on limestone that was destroyed before they could be sampled. Unless biodiversity surveys are intensified, the true magnitude of extinctions will never be ascertained. The objectives of this study were to determine tree species composition of limestone hills in Nyungcung and Ciampea; to determine quantitatively the dominant and less dominant species and to quantify floristic structure of the two limestone hills. Value of richness (Menhinick) and evenness in Nyungcung were 3.28 and 0.826 whilst in Ciampea were 3.29 and 0.823, respectively. In term of diversity (Shannon Wiener), Nyungcung seems to be more diverse than Ciampea as indicated by the higher value of diversity index. Nyungcung has 3.225 of diversity (Shannon Wiener) index while Ciampea has 2.859. The floristic composition of two sites was significantly different and mostly comprised Moraceae, Rubiaceae, and Euphorbiaceae. However, the highest presence of species were Antidesma montanum (Euphorbiaceae) and Chrysophyllum lanceolatum (Sapotaceae), and Pandanus sp. (Pandanaceae) in Nyungcung, whereas in Ciampea, Harpullia arborea (Sapindaceae), Ophiorhhiza canescens (Rubiaceae), and Allophyllus cobbe (Sapindaceae). Macaranga rhizinoides, O. canescens, A. montanum, and Turpinia montana , respectively , gained the highest importance values. Key words: limestone, flora, composition, quarries

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nyungcung richness (Menhinick) was 3.28.

Taxon
tree speciese1
Outcome
richness (Menhinick)e0
Value
3.28e0
Setting
Nyungcunge0

Verbatim

e0

“Value of richness (Menhinick) and evenness in Nyungcung were 3.28 and 0.826 whilst in Ciampea were 3.29 and 0.823, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–598 · show in text ↑
e1

“tree species composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–293 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nyungcung evenness was 0.826.

Taxon
tree speciese1
Outcome
evennesse0
Value
0.826e0
Setting
Nyungcunge0

Verbatim

e0

“Value of richness (Menhinick) and evenness in Nyungcung were 3.28 and 0.826 whilst in Ciampea were 3.29 and 0.823, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–598 · show in text ↑
e1

“tree species composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–293 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ciampea richness (Menhinick) was 3.29.

Taxon
tree speciese1
Outcome
richness (Menhinick)e0
Value
3.29e0
Setting
Ciampeae0

Verbatim

e0

“Value of richness (Menhinick) and evenness in Nyungcung were 3.28 and 0.826 whilst in Ciampea were 3.29 and 0.823, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–598 · show in text ↑
e1

“tree species composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–293 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ciampea evenness was 0.823.

Taxon
tree speciese1
Outcome
evennesse0
Value
0.823e0
Setting
Ciampeae0

Verbatim

e0

“Value of richness (Menhinick) and evenness in Nyungcung were 3.28 and 0.826 whilst in Ciampea were 3.29 and 0.823, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–598 · show in text ↑
e1

“tree species composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–293 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nyungcung Shannon Wiener diversity was 3.225.

Taxon
tree speciese1
Outcome
diversity (Shannon Wiener) indexe0
Value
3.225e0
Setting
Nyungcunge0

Verbatim

e0

“Nyungcung has 3.225 of diversity (Shannon Wiener) index while Ciampea has 2.859.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–819 · show in text ↑
e1

“tree species composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–293 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ciampea Shannon Wiener diversity was 2.859.

Taxon
tree speciese1
Outcome
diversity (Shannon Wiener) indexe0
Value
2.859e0
Setting
Ciampeae0

Verbatim

e0

“Nyungcung has 3.225 of diversity (Shannon Wiener) index while Ciampea has 2.859.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–819 · show in text ↑
e1

“tree species composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–293 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Floristic composition differed significantly between sites.

Taxon
tree speciese1
Outcome
floristic composition of two sitese0

Verbatim

e0

“The floristic composition of two sites was significantly different”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–886 · show in text ↑
e1

“tree species composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–293 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sites mainly comprised Moraceae, Rubiaceae and Euphorbiaceae.

Taxon
tree speciese1
Outcome
mostly comprised Moraceae, Rubiaceae, and Euphorbiaceaee0

Verbatim

e0

“mostly comprised Moraceae, Rubiaceae, and Euphorbiaceae.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–948 · show in text ↑
e1

“tree species composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 269–293 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antidesma montanum had one of the highest presences in Nyungcung.

Taxon
Antidesma montanumAntidesma montanume0
Outcome
highest presencee0
Setting
Nyungcunge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Antidesma montanum
Antidesma montanum · TaxonVinayaraj · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest presence of species were Antidesma montanum (Euphorbiaceae) and Chrysophyllum lanceolatum (Sapotaceae), and Pandanus sp. (Pandanaceae) in Nyungcung, whereas in Ciampea, Harpullia arborea (Sapindaceae), Ophiorhhiza canescens (Rubiaceae), and Allophyllus cobbe (Sapindaceae).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1243 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chrysophyllum lanceolatum had one of the highest presences in Nyungcung.

Taxon
Chrysophyllum lanceolatumChrysophyllum flexuosume0
Outcome
highest presencee0
Setting
Nyungcunge0

Verbatim

e0

“the highest presence of species were Antidesma montanum (Euphorbiaceae) and Chrysophyllum lanceolatum (Sapotaceae), and Pandanus sp. (Pandanaceae) in Nyungcung, whereas in Ciampea, Harpullia arborea (Sapindaceae), Ophiorhhiza canescens (Rubiaceae), and Allophyllus cobbe (Sapindaceae).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1243 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pandanus sp. had one of the highest presences in Nyungcung.

Taxon
Pandanus sp.Pandanuse0
Outcome
highest presencee0
Setting
Nyungcunge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pandanus
Pandanus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)B.navez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest presence of species were Antidesma montanum (Euphorbiaceae) and Chrysophyllum lanceolatum (Sapotaceae), and Pandanus sp. (Pandanaceae) in Nyungcung, whereas in Ciampea, Harpullia arborea (Sapindaceae), Ophiorhhiza canescens (Rubiaceae), and Allophyllus cobbe (Sapindaceae).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1243 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harpullia arborea had one of the highest presences in Ciampea.

Taxon
Harpullia arboreaHarpullia arboreae0
Outcome
highest presencee0
Setting
Ciampeae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Harpullia arborea
Harpullia arborea · TaxonVinayaraj · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest presence of species were Antidesma montanum (Euphorbiaceae) and Chrysophyllum lanceolatum (Sapotaceae), and Pandanus sp. (Pandanaceae) in Nyungcung, whereas in Ciampea, Harpullia arborea (Sapindaceae), Ophiorhhiza canescens (Rubiaceae), and Allophyllus cobbe (Sapindaceae).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1243 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ophiorhhiza canescens had one of the highest presences in Ciampea.

Taxon
Ophiorhhiza canescense0
Outcome
highest presencee0
Setting
Ciampeae0

Verbatim

e0

“the highest presence of species were Antidesma montanum (Euphorbiaceae) and Chrysophyllum lanceolatum (Sapotaceae), and Pandanus sp. (Pandanaceae) in Nyungcung, whereas in Ciampea, Harpullia arborea (Sapindaceae), Ophiorhhiza canescens (Rubiaceae), and Allophyllus cobbe (Sapindaceae).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1243 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Allophyllus cobbe had one of the highest presences in Ciampea.

Taxon
Allophyllus cobbee0
Outcome
highest presencee0
Setting
Ciampeae0

Verbatim

e0

“the highest presence of species were Antidesma montanum (Euphorbiaceae) and Chrysophyllum lanceolatum (Sapotaceae), and Pandanus sp. (Pandanaceae) in Nyungcung, whereas in Ciampea, Harpullia arborea (Sapindaceae), Ophiorhhiza canescens (Rubiaceae), and Allophyllus cobbe (Sapindaceae).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1243 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Macaranga rhizinoides had one of the highest importance values.

Taxon
Macaranga rhizinoidesMacaranga rhizinoidese0
Outcome
highest importance valuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Macaranga rhizinoides
Macaranga rhizinoides · TaxonWibowo Djatmiko ( Wie146 ) · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Macaranga rhizinoides, O. canescens, A. montanum, and Turpinia montana , respectively , gained the highest importance values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1369 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

O. canescens had one of the highest importance values.

Taxon
O. canescense0
Outcome
highest importance valuese0

Verbatim

e0

“Macaranga rhizinoides, O. canescens, A. montanum, and Turpinia montana , respectively , gained the highest importance values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1369 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A. montanum had one of the highest importance values.

Taxon
A. montanumAntidesma montanume0
Outcome
highest importance valuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Antidesma montanum
Antidesma montanum · TaxonVinayaraj · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Macaranga rhizinoides, O. canescens, A. montanum, and Turpinia montana , respectively , gained the highest importance values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1369 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Turpinia montana had one of the highest importance values.

Taxon
Turpinia montanaTurpinia montanae0
Outcome
highest importance valuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Turpinia montana
Turpinia montana · TaxonYj · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Macaranga rhizinoides, O. canescens, A. montanum, and Turpinia montana , respectively , gained the highest importance values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1369 · show in text ↑