Paper · 2013 · Asian Journal of Biological Sciences

Effect of microbial inoculants on the yield of beet-root (Beta vulgaris).

J. Ajay Kumar; K. R. Sreeramulu; G Kushala

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Comparative performance of Azotobacter chroococcum, Glucanobacter diazotrophicus tested both at 50 per cent and 75 per cent recommended N showed that Glucanobacter diazotrophicus was more effective than Azotobacter chroococcum in improving the tuber yield. The total tuber yield per plot and per hectare in plants was maximum in combined inoculation of microbial inoculants viz., Azotobacter chroococcum, Glucanobacter diazotrophicus, Bacillus megaterium and Trichoderma harzianum, with 75 per cent N, P with full dose of K compared to control plants (FYM alone T 14 ).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glucanobacter diazotrophicus improved tuber yield more than Azotobacter chroococcum at tested nitrogen rates.

Taxon
beet-rootBeta vulgarist0
Treatment
Glucanobacter diazotrophicuse0
Interactor
Glucanobacter diazotrophicuse0symbiont
Outcome
tuber yielde0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
Azotobacter chroococcume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glucanobacter diazotrophicus was more effective than Azotobacter chroococcum in improving the tuber yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–256 · show in text ↑
t0

“beet-root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inoculation with four microbes and 75 percent N and P plus full K maximized total tuber yield versus FYM alone.

Taxon
beet-rootBeta vulgarist0
Treatment
combined inoculation of microbial inoculantse0
Interactor
Azotobacter chroococcumAzotobacter chroococcume0symbiont
Second interactor
Glucanobacter diazotrophicuse0symbiont
Outcome
total tuber yield per plot and per hectaree0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
with 75 per cent N, P with full dose of Ke0
Comparator
control plants (FYM alone T 14 )e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total tuber yield per plot and per hectare in plants was maximum in combined inoculation of microbial inoculants viz., Azotobacter chroococcum, Glucanobacter diazotrophicus, Bacillus megaterium and Trichoderma harzianum, with 75 per cent N, P with full dose of K compared to control plants (FYM alone T 14 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–569 · show in text ↑
t0

“beet-root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–56 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Azotobacter chroococcum · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.