Paper · 2015 · Mycologia

Diversity of Diaporthe species associated with wood cankers of fruit and nut crops in northern California

Daniel P. Lawrence; Renaud Travadon; Kendra Baumgartner

11
claims
11
verbatim quotes
81
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Diaporthe ampelina, causal agent of Phomopsis cane and leaf spot of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) is isolated frequently from grapevine wood cankers, causing Phomopsis dieback. The latter disease is associated with four other Diaporthe species, three of which also are reported from hosts other than grape. To better understand the role of this Diaporthe community in Phomopsis dieback of grapevine and the potential for infection routes among alternate hosts, 76 Diaporthe isolates were recovered from wood cankers of cultivated grape, pear, apricot, almond and the wild host willow in four California counties. Isolates were characterized morphologically and assigned to species based on multigene sequence analyses. This study identified eight Diaporthe species from grapevine and one novel taxon from willow, D. benedicti. We report the first findings of D. australafricana and D. novem in North America. Our findings also expand the host ranges of D. ambigua to apricot and willow, D. australafricana to almond and willow, D. chamaeropis to grapevine and willow, D. foeniculina to willow and D. novem to almond. The generalists D. ambigua and D. eres were the most genetically diverse species, based on high nucleotide and haplotypic diversity, followed by the grapevine specialist D. ampelina. Analyses based on multilocus linkage disequilibrium could not reject the hypothesis of random mating for D. ambigua, which is further supported by relatively high haplotypic diversity, reports of both mating types and reports of successful matings in vitro. Pathogenicity assays revealed that D. ampelina was the most pathogenic species to grapevine wood.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eight Diaporthe species were identified from grapevine wood cankers.

Taxon
grapevineVitise1
Interactor
DiaportheDiaporthee1pathogen
Outcome
eight Diaporthe speciese1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Diaporthe
Diaporthe · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Clemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“This study identified eight Diaporthe species from grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–779 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One novel Diaporthe taxon, D. benedicti, was identified from willow.

Taxon
willowSalixe1
Interactor
D. benedictiDiaporthe benedictie1pathogen
Outcome
one novel taxone1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Salix
Salix · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Bruce Marlin · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“one novel taxon from willow, D. benedicti”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–825 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

D. australafricana and D. novem were reported for the first time in North America.

Taxon
D. australafricana and D. novemDiaporthe australafricanaDiaporthe noveme1
Outcome
first findingse1
Setting
North Americae1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e1

“We report the first findings of D. australafricana and D. novem in North America”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–907 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The host range of D. ambigua was expanded to apricot and willow.

Taxon
D. ambiguaDiaporthe ambiguae1
Outcome
to apricot and willowe1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e1

“expand the host ranges of D. ambigua to apricot and willow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–985 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The host range of D. australafricana was expanded to almond and willow.

Taxon
D. australafricanaDiaporthe australafricanae1
Outcome
to almond and willowe1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e1

“D. australafricana to almond and willow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1026 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The host range of D. chamaeropis was expanded to grapevine and willow.

Taxon
D. chamaeropisDiaporthe chamaeropise1
Outcome
to grapevine and willowe1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e1

“D. chamaeropis to grapevine and willow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1066 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The generalists D. ambigua and D. eres were the most genetically diverse Diaporthe species, based on high nucleotide and haplotypic diversity, followed by the grapevine specialist D. ampelina.

Taxon
D. ambigua and D. eresDiaporthe ambiguaDiaporthe erese1
Outcome
most genetically diverse speciese1
Qualifier
followed by the grapevine specialist D. ampelinae1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diaporthe eres
Diaporthe eres · TaxonJerry Cooper · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The generalists D. ambigua and D. eres were the most genetically diverse species, based on high nucleotide and haplotypic diversity, followed by the grapevine specialist D. ampelina”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1298 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Multilocus linkage disequilibrium analyses could not reject random mating for D. ambigua.

Taxon
D. ambiguaDiaporthe ambiguae1
Outcome
random matinge1
Qualifier
could not reject the hypothesise1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e1

“Analyses based on multilocus linkage disequilibrium could not reject the hypothesis of random mating for D. ambigua”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1415 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In pathogenicity assays D. ampelina was the most pathogenic Diaporthe species to grapevine wood.

Taxon
grapevineVitise1
Interactor
D. ampelinaDiaporthe ampelinae1pathogen
Outcome
most pathogenic speciese1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Pathogenicity assays revealed that D. ampelina was the most pathogenic species to grapevine wood”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1558–1654 · show in text ↑