Paper · 2011 · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)

NITROGEN MANAGEMENT IN SUGARCANE AND ITS INFLUENCE ON YIELD, PROFITABILITY AND LEACHING LOSSES

Juan Carlos Moreno-Seceña; Cesáreo Landeros-Sánchez; Arturo Pérez‐Vázquez; et al.

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The excessive use of nitrogen (N) in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) is a source of contamination for aquifers. The objective was to evaluate sugarcane yield, as well as profitability and amount of N leached resulting from the application of different split N doses. Three N doses (250, 200 and 150 kg ha-1) and three different application numbers (2, 3 and 4) were evaluated using a factorial design in randomized blocks. When the N dose was divided in three and four applications yields higher than 125 ton ha-1 were obtained. The greatest benefit-cost-ratio (1.8) resulted from using 150 kg ha-1 of N divided in three applications. The lowest N losses due to leaching were obtained using 150 kg ha-1 of N divided in three (16.8 kg ha-1) and four (15.4 kg ha-1) applications. Low N doses divided in three or four applications did not reduce sugarcane production; furthermore, it was more profitable and had a lower environmental impact by reducing N leaching.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three or four nitrogen applications gave sugarcane yields above 125 ton ha-1.

Treatment
N dose was divided in three and four applicationse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
125 ton ha-1e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“When the N dose was divided in three and four applications yields higher than 125 ton ha-1 were obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–532 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 150 kg ha-1 nitrogen dose split into three applications gave the highest benefit to cost ratio of 1.8.

Treatment
150 kg ha-1 of N divided in three applicationse0
Outcome
benefit-cost-ratioe0
Direction
greateste0
Value
1.8e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest benefit-cost-ratio (1.8) resulted from using 150 kg ha-1 of N divided in three applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–638 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 150 kg ha-1 nitrogen dose split into three applications gave a low leaching loss of 16.8 kg ha-1.

Treatment
150 kg ha-1 of N divided in threee0
Outcome
N losses due to leachinge0
Direction
loweste0
Value
16.8 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest N losses due to leaching were obtained using 150 kg ha-1 of N divided in three (16.8 kg ha-1) and four (15.4 kg ha-1) applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–781 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 150 kg ha-1 nitrogen dose split into four applications gave a low leaching loss of 15.4 kg ha-1.

Treatment
foure0
Outcome
N losses due to leachinge0
Direction
loweste0
Value
15.4 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest N losses due to leaching were obtained using 150 kg ha-1 of N divided in three (16.8 kg ha-1) and four (15.4 kg ha-1) applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–781 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low nitrogen doses in three or four applications did not reduce sugarcane production.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
Low N doses divided in three or four applicationse0
Outcome
sugarcane productione0
Direction
did not reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Low N doses divided in three or four applications did not reduce sugarcane production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–868 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that lower nitrogen doses split three or four ways improve profitability and reduce leaching impact.

Outcome
more profitable and had a lower environmental impacte0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“it was more profitable and had a lower environmental impact by reducing N leaching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–965 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

137 papers: 118 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 118 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

133 papers more in this group

See all 137 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.