Paper · 2015 · Oikos

Trait‐based partner selection drives mycorrhizal network assembly

Pierre‐Luc Chagnon; Robert L. Bradley; John N. Klironomos

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
65
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Plants and their microbial symbionts are often found to interact non‐randomly in nature, but we have yet to understand the mechanisms responsible for such preferential species associations. Theory predicts that host plants should select symbiotic partners bearing traits complementary to their own, as this should favor cooperation and evolutionary stability of mutualisms. Here, we present the first field‐based empirical test for this hypothesis using arbuscular mycorrhizas (AM), the oldest and most widespread plant symbiosis. Preferential associations occurring within a local plant–AM fungal community could not be predicted by the spatial distributions of interacting partners, nor by gradients in soil properties. Rather, plants with similar traits preferentially hosted similar AM fungi and, likewise, phylogenetically related AM fungi (assumed to have similar functional traits) interacted with similar plants. Our results suggest that trait‐based partner selection may have been a strong force in maintaining plant–AM fungal symbioses since the evolution of land plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Partner spatial distributions did not predict preferential plant–AM fungal associations.

Taxon
plante0
Interactor
AM fungale0symbiont
Outcome
Preferential associationse0
Direction
could not be predictede0
Setting
spatial distributions of interacting partnerse0

Verbatim

e0

“Preferential associations occurring within a local plant–AM fungal community could not be predicted by the spatial distributions of interacting partners, nor by gradients in soil properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–720 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil property gradients did not predict preferential plant–AM fungal associations.

Taxon
plante0
Interactor
AM fungale0symbiont
Outcome
Preferential associationse0
Direction
could not be predictede0
Setting
gradients in soil propertiese0

Verbatim

e0

“Preferential associations occurring within a local plant–AM fungal community could not be predicted by the spatial distributions of interacting partners, nor by gradients in soil properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–720 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants with similar traits preferentially hosted similar AM fungi.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Material
similar traitse0
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Outcome
hosted similar AM fungie0
Direction
preferentiallye0

Verbatim

e0

“plants with similar traits preferentially hosted similar AM fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–795 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phylogenetically related AM fungi interacted with similar plants.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Outcome
interacted with similar plantse0
Direction
similare0

Verbatim

e0

“phylogenetically related AM fungi (assumed to have similar functional traits) interacted with similar plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–919 · show in text ↑