Paper · 2015 · Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy

Environmental impacts of mechanization in Brazil's sugar and ethanol industry: The cutting, loading, and transportation process case

Herbert A. Scheidl; Alexandre Tadeu Simon; Antônio Carlos Pacagnella Junior; et al.

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
14
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

This work aims to analyze environmental impacts caused by mechanization in the sugar and ethanol sector in Brazil. To achieve this goal, a case study was performed in a production unit of the country's largest producer. It was found that mechanization of cutting, loading, and transportation processes for sugarcane brings immediate benefits in terms of productivity and the elimination of activities, which are potentially dangerous to workers (manual cutting). More importantly, although the mechanization elevates diesel consumption, it eliminates burning crops of sugarcane, which overall significantly reduces the emission of greenhouse gases. © 2015 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 34: 1748–1755, 2015

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanized sugarcane cutting, loading and transport increased productivity compared with manual cutting.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
mechanization of cutting, loading, and transportation processese1
Outcome
productivitye1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Comparator
manual cuttinge1

Verbatim

e1

“It was found that mechanization of cutting, loading, and transportation processes for sugarcane brings immediate benefits in terms of productivity and the elimination of activities, which are potentially dangerous to workers (manual cutting)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–461 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanized sugarcane cutting, loading and transport eliminated activities potentially dangerous to workers, compared with manual cutting.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
mechanization of cutting, loading, and transportation processese1
Outcome
potentially dangerous to workerse1
Direction
eliminatione1
Comparator
manual cuttinge1

Verbatim

e1

“It was found that mechanization of cutting, loading, and transportation processes for sugarcane brings immediate benefits in terms of productivity and the elimination of activities, which are potentially dangerous to workers (manual cutting)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–461 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanization of sugarcane harvest elevated diesel consumption.

Taxon
sugarcanee2
Treatment
mechanizatione2
Outcome
diesel consumptione2
Direction
elevatese2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“although the mechanization elevates diesel consumption, it eliminates burning crops of sugarcane, which overall significantly reduces the emission of greenhouse gases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–647 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanization of sugarcane harvest significantly reduced greenhouse gas emission by eliminating crop burning.

Taxon
sugarcanee2
Treatment
mechanizatione2
Outcome
emission of greenhouse gasese2
Direction
reducese2
Comparator
burning crops of sugarcanee2

Verbatim

e2

“although the mechanization elevates diesel consumption, it eliminates burning crops of sugarcane, which overall significantly reduces the emission of greenhouse gases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–647 · show in text ↑

pruning · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.