Paper · 2002 · Weed Technology

Effect of Steam Application on Cropland Weeds1

ROBERT L. KOLBERG; LORI J. WILES

7
claims
8
verbatim quotes
42
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Plot-scale field studies were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of steam for the control of cropland weeds in comparison with common herbicides. Weed densities, biomass, or emergence after treatment were measured. Steam (3,200 kg/ha, energy dosage equivalent to 890 kJ/m2, speed of 0.8 m/s) and glyphosate (560 g ai/ha) gave similar control (> 90%) of seedling common lambsquarters and seedling redroot pigweed. Applied at heading, steam was comparable to glyphosate in reducing green foxtail biomass at heading 2 wk after application. Steam applied at a rate of 3,200 kg/ha significantly reduced weed biomass (mixed stand, treated at seedling stage) 9 wk after application compared with the control, whereas steam applied at a rate of 1,600 kg/ha (1.6 m/s) did not. Biomass of downy brome treated with steam was reduced more at anthesis than at the seedling growth stage. Emergence of common lambsquarters, redroot pigweed, and black nightshade was not affected by steam application. Amount of steam applied, weed species, and growth stage are key factors in determining control effectiveness.Nomenclature: Glyphosate; black nightshade, Solanum nigrum L. #3 SOLNI; downy brome, Bromus tectorum L. # BROTE; common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. # CHEAL; green foxtail, Setaria viridis L. # SETVI; redroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. # AMARE.Additional index words: Kochia scoparia L. Schrad., KOCSC, paraquat, pelargonic acid, SALIB, Salsola iberica Sennen & Pau.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Steam and glyphosate gave similar control (>90%) of seedling common lambsquarters and seedling redroot pigweed.

Taxon
seedling common lambsquarters and seedling redroot pigweede0
Treatment
Steame0
Outcome
controle0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Value
> 90%e0
Comparator
glyphosatee0

Verbatim

e0

“Steam (3,200 kg/ha, energy dosage equivalent to 890 kJ/m2, speed of 0.8 m/s) and glyphosate (560 g ai/ha) gave similar control (> 90%) of seedling common lambsquarters and seedling redroot pigweed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–411 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied at heading, steam was comparable to glyphosate in reducing green foxtail biomass 2 weeks after application.

Taxon
green foxtaile1
Organ / stage
headinge1
Treatment
steame1
Outcome
biomasse1
Direction
reducinge1
Qualifier
2 wk after applicatione1
Comparator
glyphosatee1

Verbatim

e1

“Applied at heading, steam was comparable to glyphosate in reducing green foxtail biomass at heading 2 wk after application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–535 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Steam applied at 3,200 kg/ha significantly reduced weed biomass in a mixed stand treated at the seedling stage 9 weeks after application compared with the control.

Taxon
weede2
Organ / stage
seedling stagee2
Treatment
Steam applied at a rate of 3,200 kg/hae2
Outcome
weed biomasse2
Direction
reducede2
Qualifier
9 wk after applicatione2
Comparator
controle2
Setting
mixed stande2

Verbatim

e2

“Steam applied at a rate of 3,200 kg/ha significantly reduced weed biomass (mixed stand, treated at seedling stage) 9 wk after application compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–700 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Steam applied at 1,600 kg/ha (1.6 m/s) did not significantly reduce weed biomass 9 weeks after application compared with the control.

Taxon
weede2
Treatment
steam applied at a rate of 1,600 kg/hae3
Outcome
weed biomasse2
Direction
did note3
Qualifier
9 wk after applicatione2
Comparator
controle2

Verbatim

e2

“Steam applied at a rate of 3,200 kg/ha significantly reduced weed biomass (mixed stand, treated at seedling stage) 9 wk after application compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–700 · show in text ↑
e3

“whereas steam applied at a rate of 1,600 kg/ha (1.6 m/s) did not”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Steam reduced downy brome biomass more at anthesis than at the seedling growth stage.

Taxon
downy bromeBromus tectorume4
Organ / stage
anthesise4
Treatment
steame4
Outcome
Biomasse4
Direction
reduced moree4
Comparator
seedling growth stagee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Bromus tectorum
Bromus tectorum · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Biomass of downy brome treated with steam was reduced more at anthesis than at the seedling growth stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Emergence of common lambsquarters, redroot pigweed and black nightshade was not affected by steam application.

Taxon
common lambsquarters, redroot pigweed, and black nightshadee5
Treatment
steam applicatione5
Outcome
Emergencee5
Direction
not affectede5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e5

“Emergence of common lambsquarters, redroot pigweed, and black nightshade was not affected by steam application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–984 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amount of steam applied, weed species and growth stage are key factors determining steam control effectiveness.

Taxon
weede6
Treatment
Amount of steam appliede6
Outcome
control effectivenesse6

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e6

“Amount of steam applied, weed species, and growth stage are key factors in determining control effectiveness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1094 · show in text ↑